Andrew Care Home

Pros

• The care provided here is excellent.
• Staff really care about the residents and it consistently shows.
• It is a great place to live.
• There is great health and mental health housing.
• There is a wide array of programs and amenities.
• There is a fitness room and a personal trainer.
• There are music rooms and personal lessons.
• Bus passes are available.
• Personal scheduling is offered.
• There is tobacco cessation.
• There are social and mental health programs.
• The facility is IRTS licensed.
• The artwork on the walls is nice.
• Dieticians are available and there is cafeteria-style dining for all three meals.
• There is AA and chemical dependency programming.

Cons

• Rabin was not a good supervisor.
• The reviewer wasn't really happy living there.
• There was mold and cold sandwiches.
• The staff had taken half of every paycheck earned by residents.
• The rooms were jail cell size.
• Bedrooms were separated by hanging sheets, compromising privacy.
• The building was in need of new carpet.
• The reviewer would give it one star.

Review

Roughly a mosaic of impressions emerges from the notes about this facility, presenting both warm praise for how care is delivered and a sharp critique of the conditions, governance, and day-to-day realities that can accompany long-term residence. On one hand, several lines highlight that the care provided is excellent and that staff genuinely care about the residents. The sentiment runs through different voices: one person emphasizes that the care here is consistently evident, with staff who truly seem to care about the people living there. Even a resident who stayed for a substantial stretch - eight and a half years - acknowledges that the place wasn't perfect and that happiness was never fully achieved, but they also concede they were "better off" for being there in at least some respects. The overall tone suggests that, when it works, this is a setting where compassionate staff and a broad, supportive environment can make a meaningful difference for residents.

There is a contrasting but similarly strong sense of endorsement from another perspective, notably through the experience of the resident's Aunt Louella. They describe the facility as a "great place," with only one notable limitation: bedroom privacy. In this view, the core strength lies in the overall quality of life and the caregiving environment, and the belief that privacy could be improved without undermining the broader strengths of the community. The impression is that the base framework - care, routines, and community life - functions well enough to be considered a good place to live, even if some structural adjustments remain desirable.

Beyond the general sense of good care, the descriptions paint a comprehensive picture of the services and opportunities on offer. There is broad confidence in the health and mental health support, described as a "great health and mental health housing" setup that comes with a wide array of programs and amenities. People mention a fitness room with a personal trainer, which signals an emphasis on physical well-being alongside medical and psychological support. The programming is described as diverse, including Alcoholics Anonymous and other chemical-dependency programs, music rooms and opportunities for personal lessons, and practical supports like bus passes and personal scheduling. Additional elements include tobacco cessation programs and a robust menu of social and mental health programming. The facility is noted as IRTS licensed, and there are dieticians and a cafeteria offering a line-style dining experience across three meals each day. Taken together, these notes sketch a vibrant, service-rich environment that aims to address a wide range of resident needs, from healthcare to personal development and daily logistics.

Yet, the narrative quickly pivots toward more troubling notes, signaling serious concerns that would sit uncomfortably in any description of a care facility. A terse line - "Mold and cold sandwiches" - jarringly juxtaposes the positive descriptions with a stark accusation of substandard conditions or quality. This brief line stands in as a reminder that, for some residents, basic safety and nourishment can feel compromised even amid otherwise strong programming and staff engagement. The overall message here is that the facility's potential examples of care and community are shadowed by tangible, everyday problems that affect the lived experience of residents.

The harsher, more personal critiques center on governance, finances, privacy, and autonomy. One resident writes that the place "is in need of real public service," but also acknowledges that the people who work there "care for the most part." The complaint about finances is pointed and painful: "They have taken half of every paycheck I have earned." The living accommodations are described as cramped and regulated in ways that feel punitive: the facility has "2 and 3 bed room" layouts that are "separated by hanging sheets," with rooms described as "jail cell size." Cleanliness is framed as a matter of personal effort - "It is as clean as you make it" - implying a lack of consistent housekeeping standards that place responsibility on residents rather than on staff. The communication environment is likewise questioned, with the sentiment that mail is not personal and is opened with permission, an intrusion that reinforces a sense of monitored, managed resident life.

There are also concrete critiques about finances and daily life: the resident notes a limit of "$97 a month after any SSI," and mentions various administrative controls tied to the financial aspects of living there, including reservations about itemized bills and being part of a resident council. The sense of empowerment is undercut by a perception that the administration operates in a way that makes residents feel they are merely going through motions. The description of the building itself reinforces the sense of aging infrastructure: a call for new carpet and a sense that "the art work on the walls are nice," but are "owned by the owner," hints at a privatized governance structure where tangible assets are controlled by the owner rather than the residents or a transparent governing body.

Toward the end of the set of notes, there is a stark, personal conclusion about governance and the lived experience: the writer identifies as 34 and living among mentally disabled people who "are being used," a claim that signals a profound ethical concern about exploitation and the dignity of residents. The closing sentiment is framed in hopeful, if cautious, language: "Good luck," underscoring that potential residents should be mindful of both the strengths and the significant concerns that accompany life here. The final word across these notes is not one of simple praise or simple condemnation, but a nuanced, uneasy mix of gratitude for the care and community that can exist within the facility, and frustration or alarm about privacy, autonomy, and systemic issues that seem to blunt or threaten that care.

Taken together, these reflections present a complex portrait. On the positive side, the facility appears to deliver compassionate care and a broad, well-rounded program lineup designed to support health, mental health, education, and social life. The existence of a personal trainer, music rooms, diverse treatment programs, and a three-meal dining setup suggests a strong commitment to a holistic approach and to enabling residents to grow, learn, and stay engaged. On the negative side, the accounts of privacy limitations, cramped living spaces, inconsistent cleanliness, mail and financial controls, and a governing structure perceived as dominated by a single owner point to deep-rooted concerns about dignity, autonomy, and transparency. The blend of these elements - caring staff and meaningful programs alongside serious questions about living conditions and administrative processes - creates a nuanced legacy for the facility, one that is capable of offering real value to residents while simultaneously inviting scrutiny and calls for reform in ways that would matter deeply to those living there.

Located in the heart of Minneapolis, this neighborhood offers a variety of amenities and services that cater to seniors. With several hospitals nearby, including Hennepin County Medical Center and the University of Minnesota Medical Center, residents have easy access to quality healthcare. There are also numerous restaurants, cafes, and pharmacies within close proximity, providing convenience for daily needs. For leisure activities, there are several parks such as Mill Ruins Park and Loring Park where seniors can enjoy nature walks and outdoor recreation. Additionally, places of worship like Westminster Presbyterian Church offer spiritual support for those seeking community connections. Overall, this area provides a well-rounded environment for senior living with access to essential services and recreational opportunities.

Hospitals

• Csc Gi Lab (0.4 miles)
• Hennepin County Medical Center (0.4 miles)
• University of Minnesota Medical Center - East Bank Campus (1.3 miles)
• Regency Hospital (4.1 miles)
• VA Medical Center (5.2 miles)

Restaurants

• Maxwell's American Cafe (0.5 miles)
• Sawatdee Thai Restaurant - Minneapolis (0.7 miles)
• Hell's Kitchen (0.9 miles)
• Owamni (1 miles)
• 19 Bar (1.1 miles)
• Gluek's Restaurant & Bar (1.2 miles)
• Aster Cafe (1.2 miles)

Parks

• Gateway Dog Park - Off-Leash Play Area (0.6 miles)
• Mill Ruins Park (0.9 miles)
• Loring Park (1.3 miles)
• Franklin Terrace Off-Leash Dog Park (1.5 miles)
• North Loop Dog Park (1.8 miles)
• Boom Island Park (1.8 miles)
• Longfellow Park (2.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• Westminster Presbyterian Church (0.9 miles)
• WW Studio (5.5 miles)
• Elim Church Center (5.6 miles)
• St George Greek Orthodox Church (5.7 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.1 miles)
• Walgreens (1.4 miles)
• Target Pharmacy (1.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.2 miles)
• Walgreens (2.2 miles)
• Walgreens (3 miles)

Cafes

• Dunn Brothers Coffee (1.3 miles)
• Spyhouse Coffee (1.9 miles)
• Roundtable Cof (2.9 miles)
• Jinx Tea (4.7 miles)
• Groundswell (4.9 miles)
• Starbucks (5.2 miles)

Physicians

• Whittier Clinic (1.5 miles)
• HealthPartners Health Center for Women Clinic St Paul (2.5 miles)
• Dermatology Consultants P.A. (4.6 miles)
• Parkway Family Physicians (5.5 miles)

Transportation

• Minnesota State Fair Transit Hub (4.1 miles)

Theaters

• AMC Rosedale 14 (5.3 miles)