Comforcare Good Samaritan Ctr in Austin, MN

Pros

• The entire staff provided excellent care, being professional, caring, attentive, empathetic, and patient-focused.
• The therapy team is top-notch and truly cares about recovery.
• The patient received outstanding physical and occupational therapy.
• Anne’s team is the very best.
• The nurses are the best ever and truly care about residents and their families.
• The caregivers are great friends.
• Comforcare in Austin, Minnesota is highly recommended.

Cons

• Chickens roaming freely around the outdoor area and leaving droppings, which get dragged back inside on canes, walkers, and wheelchair wheels, are seen as a health code violation.
• The front desk is unmanned and staff are seen giggling and wasting time, which is not cool.
• The name "Comforcare" is confusing with "Comfort Care," a terrible name that may confuse health care providers.
• The front door is not staffed, with poor communication and no follow-through on questions.
• There is no staff available to assist visitors, and the front entry should be adequately staffed at all times, as waiting times occur.
• A reviewer described a staff member who posted a terrible statement as "poisonous" and said they do not represent the nursing home’s values and should not be in HR.

Review

This community is best suited for seniors who need focused post-acute rehabilitation and attentive nursing care, with the Healing Grace wing underscoring a clear rehab emphasis. The standout strength is the therapy program, physical and occupational therapy delivered by a team described as top-notch, with the therapists genuinely dedicated to recovery. Reviews repeatedly praise the staff’s professionalism and patient-centered approach, especially highlighting the therapy team led by Anne as exceptional. For families prioritizing a facility that can drive a solid recovery after surgery or a serious illness, Comforcare Good Samaritan Ctr offers a compelling rehabilitation corridor and a nursing team that keeps residents at the center of care.

That clarity, however, comes with important caveats. A subset of reviews flag operational gaps that can complicate the resident and family experience beyond rehab needs: front-door staffing gaps, inconsistent communication, and questions about accountability or follow-through on inquiries. One recurring concern is a front desk that can feel unmanned or slow to respond, which can leave visitors unsure about rooms or visiting logistics. There is also mention of confusion caused by the facility’s name, which can momentarily muddy expectations for families who may be seeking a different type of care. Additionally, at least one review raises a health-environment concern about outside conditions and cleanliness, points that matter when evaluating ongoing quality and day-to-day safety. Given these signals, those who prize a consistently smooth front-end experience and clear, proactive communication should explore alternatives or verify current operations during a visit.

The strongest positives, exceptional rehabilitation outcomes and deeply caring nursing staff, often offset the main drawbacks for families focused on recovery metrics. Residents who enter for post-acute rehab can expect highly engaged therapists, rapid progress, and careful monitoring by nurses who are described as genuinely caring. Anne’s therapy team is singled out as a standout, delivering tangible gains and a collaborative, goal-oriented rehab plan. When therapy is the priority, the facility’s strengths eclipse the friction described in visitor-facing areas. In practice, the credible evidence is that the Healing Grace wing really does support recovery milestones, and the nursing care tends to stay professional and patient-focused during the crucial recovery window.

For families evaluating options, a practical path is essential. During a tour or a trial stay, demand a full view of the rehab schedule, meet the therapists who would be assigned to the loved one, and benchmark the daily nurse presence and responsiveness. Confirm who handles admissions questions after hours, and insist on a clear, timely process for updates to families. Ask about front-desk coverage patterns, visitor guidance, and how care transitions are communicated between staff, residents, and families. If outdoor areas are part of daily life, request current information on environmental practices, cleanliness, and any policy changes that address prior concerns. These checks help separate enduring rehab strength from the operational friction that has appeared in some reviews.

The decision hinges on the resident’s care priorities. If the goal is robust, evidence-based rehab with a responsive nursing team, Comforcare Good Samaritan Ctr should be seriously considered. The Healing Grace wing, combined with a cohort of skilled therapists and attentive nurses, creates a recovery-focused ecosystem that can produce meaningful functional gains. On the flip side, if daily life in a facility requires consistently seamless front-desk operation, transparent communication, and friction-free visitation, then it is prudent to compare with alternatives that emphasize administrative reliability and streamlined family interaction. The name ambiguity and the handful of visitor-facing concerns are not fatal, but they are enough to steer families toward a back-up option if administrative consistency is non-negotiable.

In the end, the facility’s rehab DNA is its decisive advantage. For seniors recovering from orthopedic surgery or needing intensive rehabilitation with a team that truly prioritizes patient progress, Comforcare Good Samaritan Ctr is a credible, often excellent choice in Austin. The care plan and therapy outcomes can justify choosing this community, provided the family is prepared to navigate occasional front-desk gaps and to confirm that current practices align with expectations for visitor support, communication, and environmental safety. If rehabilitation weight is the priority, pursue a direct conversation with the administrator about staffing coverage, response times, and current initiatives aimed at tightening communication, the most reliable way to convert strong clinical care into a consistently smooth overall experience.

Physicians

• Family Eye Care Center Of Austin (0.1 miles)
• Austin Eye Clinic (0.9 miles)
• Quick Care (0.9 miles)
• Austin Medical Center-Mayo Health (0.9 miles)
• Austin Medical Center Behavioral (0.9 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (0.1 miles)
• Sterling Main Street (0.2 miles)
• Sterling Stores (0.2 miles)
• Good Neighbor Pharmacy (0.3 miles)
• Medicap Pharmacy (0.3 miles)
• St Olaf Pharmacy (0.9 miles)
• Smart-Fill Management Group (1 miles)

Places of Worship

• Our Savior's Lutheran Church (0.1 miles)
• Cornerstone Church (0.2 miles)
• First Congregational United Church of Christ (0.3 miles)
• St Edwards Church (0.4 miles)
• Iglesia Pentecostals Del Remanente De Dios (0.5 miles)
• St Augustine Church (0.7 miles)
• Cedar River Church of Christ (0.7 miles)

Hospitals

• Crime Victims Resource Center (0.1 miles)
• Stress Unit (0.9 miles)
• Blooming Prairie Clinic (14 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.4 miles)
• Grinder's Deli (0.6 miles)
• Maya Taqueria (0.7 miles)
• McDonald's (0.7 miles)
• Kenny's Oak Grill (0.8 miles)
• 1910 Fresh Mexican Kitchen (0.9 miles)
• Domino's Pizza (0.9 miles)

Cafes

• Coffee House On Main (0.9 miles)
• Caribou Coffee (1.2 miles)
• Bubble's Cafe (15.4 miles)

Parks

• Bandshell Community Park (1 miles)
• Bustad Park (1.1 miles)
• Mill Pond (1.1 miles)
• Austin Dog Park (1.1 miles)
• North Driesner Park (1.4 miles)
• City Park (14.1 miles)
• Myre Big Island State Park (15.9 miles)

Transportation

• Austin Shuttle (1.7 miles)
• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (7.9 miles)