1401 15th Avenue Northwest, Austin, MN 55912
To contact a resident: (507) 396-0085
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Our House Senior Living Memory Care - Austin Costs & Pricing
At Our House Senior Living Memory Care in Austin, the monthly cost for a studio is $4,680, which is significantly higher than the averages observed in Mower County and across Minnesota. In Mower County, similar facilities typically charge around $2,968 per month for comparable accommodations, while the state average stands at approximately $3,617. This pricing reflects not only the specialized care offered but also indicates a higher level of personalized services and amenities that cater specifically to the needs of residents with memory-related challenges. Prospective clients should consider these factors alongside their budget when evaluating options for memory care living.
| Floor plans | Our House Senior Living Memory Care - Austin | Mower County | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $4,680 | $2,968 | $3,617 |
Overall Review of Our House Senior Living Memory Care - Austin
Pros
She seems to enjoy her meals, which look healthy and tasteful.- Her room is clean and well kept.
- The openness of the space lets visitors see the kitchen staff at work.
- The place has a warm, inviting feeling.
Cons
Her grandmother always wore someone else's clothes.- Her room was messy.
- She was always left at a table and not attended to.
- There was always new staff.
- Management was never there.
- Staff wore skin-tight clothing and leggings and barely spoke English.
- Staff swore while talking to each other.
- Her sister-in-law seemed to be a little confused about the transitioning process.
Review
This community is best suited for families that prize a clean, visually welcoming memory care setting with clearly visible daytime operations and meals that look appetizing. It works for residents who respond well to an open, kitchen-forward atmosphere where staff activity is easy to observe and where daily meals are a positive, tangible part of the day. In short, it suits families seeking transparency in operations and a tidy, home-like environment, provided there is tolerance for variability in staffing and leadership presence.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families prioritizing consistent, highly professional care with steady leadership. The reviews raise red flags for anyone who cannot accept frequent turnover, frequent new staff, and uneven supervision. Language barriers and unprofessional conduct by staff (swearing, limited English, questionable attire) point to communication gaps that can undermine safety and trust. If a resident requires highly structured routines, dependable caregiving, and proactive management oversight, a different option with stable leadership and stronger care coordination is worth exploring.
The strongest positives here are tangible and meaningful in day-to-day life. Clean, well-kept rooms and kitchen-visible operations contribute to a sense of pride in the facility and can reassure families about housekeeping standards and the quality of meals. The meals themselves are described as healthy and tasteful, and the open layout fosters a feeling of transparency, the kind of environment where family members can see staff at work and leaders engaging with residents. A warm, inviting ambience can make the transition into memory care less jarring, which matters when residents are navigating change.
However, those strengths do not fully offset the principal concerns. The most salient risk is the lack of consistent leadership presence and a high rate of staff turnover. With new staff members appearing frequently and management reportedly hard to pin down, continuity of care and reliable communication suffer. Language barriers and limited English among caregivers can complicate important tasks such as understanding a resident’s changing needs, medication details, and transition plans. The behavior noted in one review, staff speaking sharply, clothing considerations, and a sense that residents are not always attended to promptly, undercuts the core trust families seek in memory care.
From a practical decision-making standpoint, these findings translate into concrete steps. Prospective families should request a tour timed during regular shifts to observe caregiver interactions, ask for detailed staffing patterns (rn-to-resident ratios, float coverage, and supervisor presence), and review leadership structure, who runs the building, how decisions are made, and how many hours the administrator spends on the floor. Inquire about the transition process for new residents, care-plan development, and how memory-specific programming is delivered on a daily basis. If possible, request recent incident or safety logs and speak with frontline staff about training and support they receive.
The verdict is clear: this community can work for those who prioritize cleanliness, visible kitchen hours, and meals that read as nutritious and appealing, and who can tolerate or monitor staffing variability. For families seeking rock-solid consistency, predictable routines, and unwavering leadership, alternatives with proven stable staffing and stronger supervision are advisable. Scheduling a focused visit with specific questions about management presence, staff retention, and multilingual caregiving will illuminate whether the current model can meet the resident’s long-term needs or if it’s wiser to look elsewhere.
Assisted Living
Memory Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities off-site
Beautician on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Respite or short term stays offered
Wheelchair accessible showers
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Meals provided
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Safeguarding Your Memory Through the Golden Years: Eight Ways to Preserve Cognitive Health
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment