Columbine Commons Care Center

Pros

• The reviewer is pleased with the care and rehab teams at Columbine Commons, having had positive experiences on multiple occasions.
• They appreciate that Columbine Commons is their first choice for post-surgery rehab, indicating a level of trust in the facility.
• Despite minor concerns about food portions, they recognize that the approach to serving sizes may promote healthier eating habits.
• The reviewer has a strong connection to Columbine Commons, as they have had family members receive care there as well.

Cons

• The reviewer feels that nobody responded when they pulled the call cord to test the staff's responsiveness.
• They believe that staff did not notice a patient's swelling and were not attentive during rounds.
• The reviewer is critical of the facility's slow response to UTIs, leading to septic issues.
• They express dissatisfaction with the overall management and operations of the company running the facility.

Review

In the realm of rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities, opinions can vary significantly from one individual to another. A prime example is Columbine Commons, which has elicited contrasting reviews from those who have experienced its services. One patron expresses profound satisfaction with the facility, emphasizing their repeated visits for rehab following surgeries. This individual's positive experiences span over several years, including care received by family members in various capacities—her husband recovering from joint replacement surgery and her father residing there until his passing.

This reviewer’s endorsement stems from consistent interactions with the care and rehab teams at Columbine Commons. Each stay has apparently met expectations for quality treatment and attentive service. The reviewer specifically highlights the professionalism and dedication of the staff, underscoring a sense of reliability during moments of physical recovery. Despite such glowing feedback, they did note an area where improvements could be made: the food served at the facility. They commented on portion sizes being somewhat small but rationalized this as a potential benefit, given societal issues surrounding overeating in America.

Transitioning to a starkly different perspective is another individual who shares a deeply troubling experience within the same facility. This reviewer vehemently asserts that they would not even entrust their pet to Columbine Commons based on their observations and experiences there. Testing staff responsiveness by pulling an emergency cord revealed alarming results; no one came to check on them despite pressing circumstances that required attention. With claims about unattended swelling issues and serious medical lapses regarding urinary tract infections (UTIs) that escalated to sepsis, it places doubts on whether proper rounds or monitoring protocols are adequately followed.

The critical review raises significant concerns about neglect and insufficient vigilance within the skilled nursing care framework at Columbine Commons. Repeated statements regarding the failure to act promptly with medical interventions call into question the overall management and operational effectiveness of not just this specific location but also other facilities under similar corporate ownership—implying systemic issues rather than isolated incidents.

The contrast between these two reviews presents a complex picture of patient care at Columbine Commons. On one hand, there’s an individual who finds solace in returning to familiar surroundings where they feel supported during rehabilitation; on the other hand, there exists grave dissatisfaction tied to reported neglectful practices that endangered health outcomes for vulnerable residents. Such divergent narratives reflect broader challenges faced within healthcare systems when ensuring consistent standards across various locations.

Ultimately, prospective patients or families seeking rehabilitation services must navigate through these conflicting testimonials while weighing their options carefully. Personal recommendations may hold weight for some; however, it's imperative to consider all feedback critically as both enthusiasm for excellent care and discontent regarding negligence coalesce around this facility's reputation. Each experience shed light on aspects vital for decision-making while traversing sensitive times in recovery or eldercare contexts—a reminder that healthcare quality can fluctuate drastically depending upon varying circumstances and caregiver efficacy.

Parks

• Windsor Main Park (0.2 miles)
• Eastman Park (0.7 miles)
• Poudre Heights Park (1.4 miles)
• Windsor Highlands Park (4.1 miles)
• Coyote Gulch Park (4.2 miles)
• Twin Silo Park (6.6 miles)
• Boyd Lake State Park (7.7 miles)

Cafes

• The Human Bean (0.5 miles)
• Windsor Lake Coffee (0.5 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (0.7 miles)
• Doug's Diner (0.8 miles)
• Starbucks (5.8 miles)
• Harbinger Coffee (6.7 miles)
• Starbucks (7.1 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.9 miles)
• Jimmy John's (1 miles)
• Wendy's (1.5 miles)
• Ted's Sweetwater Grill & Trout Pond (3 miles)
• Fuzzy's Taco Shop (4.9 miles)
• Nordy's BBQ & Grill (5 miles)
• Palomino Mexican Restaurant (5.1 miles)

Physicians

• Valstad Judson Dain DMD - Judson D Valstad, DMD (1.1 miles)
• UCHealth Radiology - Windsor (1.3 miles)
• Banner Medical Clinic-Highland Meadows (4 miles)
• Icon Lasik (5.6 miles)
• Restore Health Center (5.6 miles)
• Thompson River Pediatrics (6.2 miles)
• Dr. Kiefer & Associates (6.2 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.4 miles)
• Summit View Pharmacy (7.3 miles)
• Walgreens (7.8 miles)

Places of Worship

• Timberline Windsor (2.4 miles)
• Resurrection Fellowship (4.9 miles)

Transportation

• Northern Colorado Regional Airport (FNL) (5.8 miles)
• Harmony Transportation Center (6.1 miles)

Theaters

• Metro Lux 14 Theatres (6 miles)

Hospitals

• Clear View Behavioral Health (6.1 miles)
• University Of Colorado Health Northern Colorado (7.9 miles)