Orchard Lane Retirement Apts

Pros

• He is described as the most dedicated man to his residents that they have ever had.
• He cares about his residents and the condition of the apartments.
• He promptly handles repairs when they are needed.
• He adheres to the rules set forth by his supervisor and HUD Housing Authorities.

Cons

• The landlord/manager is abusive to the elderly.
• He likes to threaten them.
• He is the most egotistical landlord the reviewer has ever met.
• He has no compassion for residents.
• He is short-tempered and hot-headed.
• He makes residents fear for their safety.
• He does not belong working in this environment with these types of individuals.

Review

In examining the mixed feedback surrounding the current property management, the most striking feature is how two sharply different experiences can coexist under the same roof. One reader, who identifies themselves as a longtime resident and references a remark-by remark engagement with the property's leadership, portrays the manager as a steadfast and caring figure. This view, attributed to Jean J., emphasizes dedication to residents and to the living conditions of the complex. According to this account, the manager has been the most devoted administrator the writer has encountered since moving in, with a clear focus on both the upkeep of the apartments and the well-being of the people who live there.

The positive portrayal centers on practical, observable actions. The reviewer says the manager truly cares about "what the apartments look like" and about repairs, noting that maintenance requests are addressed in a timely manner. There is an explicit sense that the manager does not shy away from responsibility and that he is willing to go the extra mile to ensure that units are habitable and presentable. The description also underscores that the manager operates within the framework of the rules established by his supervisor and the HUD housing authorities, suggesting a conscientious effort to balance resident needs with regulatory requirements. In this telling, the manager's adherence to policy is not a punitive stance but a structured approach that guides how he serves the community.

Yet, the same account acknowledges that the manager has faced strain from certain quarters. It notes that he has "taken abuse from people here," which adds a layer of resilience to the positive assessment. The implication is that the manager remains accountable to obligations and standards while navigating a sometimes challenging environment. The praise, then, is not blind admiration; it is framed as appreciation for a person who is trying to uphold responsibilities under pressure, with HUD guidelines acting as a compass for his actions.

Balancing this favorable portrait, another voice within the same review or within the broader feedback raises a starkly contrasting claim about the landlord and manager's treatment of elderly residents. This segment presents a stark accusation: the landlord and manager are abusive toward the elderly, prone to threats, and characterized by egotism. The language is blunt and pointed, describing the manager as "the most egotistical landlord" who operates without compassion toward the residents. The concern is not about occasional missteps or policy misalignment but about ongoing behavior that, in the writer's view, undermines safety and dignity.

According to these assertions, the manager's temperament is a core issue. The reviewer describes a short temper and a hot-headed demeanor, suggesting that such behavior makes residents fear for their safety and feel unable to enjoy living in what should be a personal, secure home. The negative portrayal emphasizes how fear and intimidation can erode the sense of well-being and community that a housing complex should foster, especially for elderly residents who may be more vulnerable. The language points to a fundamental problem: when leadership is perceived as threatening, it compounds the stress of aging in place and can transform a once-okay environment into an atmosphere of unease.

What emerges from juxtaposing these two strands is a complex, high-stakes dynamic in which the same manager can be seen as a diligent custodian by some and as a source of fear by others. On one hand, there is recognition of diligent repairs, consistent upkeep, and a commitment to rules shaped by higher authorities. On the other hand, there are serious allegations of intimidation, lack of compassion, and behavior that residents interpret as unsafe and dehumanizing. The tension between these viewpoints invites scrutiny of how management communicates with residents, how decisions are explained and enforced, and how the needs of elderly residents are weighed against policy and enforcement practices.

Taken together, the narrative hints at deeper questions about the management of elderly housing communities. If a manager can be praised for responsiveness and regard for resident welfare while simultaneously being accused of abusive behavior toward the same demographic, the real issue appears to be not merely about individual actions but about the culture and mechanisms of accountability within the building. Residents may feel that good maintenance and rule compliance coexist with a climate that can feel punitive or intimidating to those who are most vulnerable. The situation underscores the importance of transparent communication, independent oversight where concerns about safety are raised, and a careful balance between enforcing policies and preserving residents' dignity and sense of security. In the end, these divergent experiences remind us that a housing community's health rests as much on how people feel in their homes as on the tangible work that keeps those homes functional.

Restaurants

• Fernando's Mexican Food (0.2 miles)
• Walkabout Creek Saloon (3 miles)
• Sticky Fingers Bakery & Cafe (3 miles)
• Cowiche Creek (4.6 miles)
• The Tasting Room (8.2 miles)
• Tacos El Rey- West Valley (10.7 miles)
• McDonald's (10.7 miles)

Transportation

• All That's Wild Taxidermy (0.9 miles)
• U-Haul (10.8 miles)

Cafes

• Camo Coffee (3 miles)
• Peet's Coffee and Tea (10.7 miles)
• Starbucks (10.8 miles)
• 40th Avenue Espresso (10.9 miles)
• White House Cafe (11.4 miles)
• Caffe Capri (11.5 miles)
• Tom Tom Espresso On 40th (11.9 miles)

Physicians

• Naches Medical Clinic (3.1 miles)
• Pacific Crest Family Medicine (10.5 miles)
• Summitview Family Medicine (10.5 miles)
• Yakima Valley Dermatology Associates (11.1 miles)
• Pacific Cataract and Laser Institute (11.2 miles)
• North Star Lodge (11.2 miles)
• Thompson Audiology (11.3 miles)

Places of Worship

• Peace of Christ Church of Naches (3.1 miles)
• Selah Covenant Church (10.5 miles)
• Yakima Evangelical Church (10.6 miles)
• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (11.1 miles)
• Englewood Christian Church (11.2 miles)
• Messy Church at Wesley (11.4 miles)
• St Timothy's Episcopal Church (11.4 miles)

Pharmacies

• Rosauers Supermarkets (10.4 miles)
• Fred Meyer Pharmacy (10.7 miles)
• Walgreens (11.2 miles)
• Howard's Drug (11.3 miles)
• River Village Pharmacy (11.6 miles)
• Walgreens (11.6 miles)
• Hi-School Pharmacy (11.7 miles)

Parks

• Volunteer Park (10.8 miles)
• Chesterley Park (11.1 miles)
• Selah Parks & Recreation Department (11.2 miles)
• Harlan landing (12.1 miles)