Colonial Apartments

Pros

• The building is described as great with friendly neighbors.
• The reviewer loves the apartment.

Cons

• The place is not a good place to live.
• The maintenance guy screamed at the reviewer.
• The maintenance guy refused to let the reviewer into a paraplegic client's home who is locked inside and needs care.
• The maintenance guy claimed to have made many keys for his aides, which the reviewer doubts.
• The staff are disrespectful and think they can talk to residents any way they want.

Review

The place attracts mixed reactions from its residents, with one account painting a troubling, high-stress picture and another offering a bright, hopeful view. Taken together, the two reviews reveal a property where experiences can diverge dramatically from one resident to the next, depending on who you interact with and what situation you find yourself in.

In the negative account, the writer describes a living situation that feels unsafe and unwelcoming, especially for someone who is caregiving for a paraplegic client. The core grievance centers on an encounter with the maintenance person, who allegedly screamed at the reviewer and refused to grant entry to the paraplegic client's home, even though the client is described as being locked inside and in need of care. The reviewer emphasizes a lack of respect and professionalism, suggesting that the maintenance worker spoke to them in a belittling or dismissive manner. A particularly troubling claim is that the maintenance worker asserted he had made "so many keys for his aides" and implied misappropriated or questionable access credentials. The reviewer identifies themselves as the client's aide and notes that the maintenance person had recently been in the hospital for 12 days, arguing that it would be impossible for him to have produced three new keys for aides in the prior two weeks. The overall tone is one of frustration and alarm: the staff are portrayed as disregarding the needs and dignity of someone who requires caregiving, and the reviewer portrays the building's handling of access and respect as chaotic and unsafe.

Beyond the immediate incident, the negative review implies systemic issues with how staff interact with residents, particularly those who rely on assistance. The author emphasizes a perception of disrespect and a failure to treat residents - and their caregivers - with appropriate courtesy. The insistence that the maintenance worker could talk to people "any way they want" underscores a broader concern about boundaries, authority, and safety within the building's daily routines. The caregiver's fear and sense of being dismissed amplify the impression that this is not a good place for people who need reliable support and compassionate handling when they or their clients are at their most vulnerable.

The contrast comes in the second review, which presents a completely different lived experience. Here, the emphasis is on positive feelings about the place: it is described as a great building with friendly neighbors, and the reviewer expresses clear affection for the apartment itself. The succinct praise suggests residents who feel supported by a welcoming community and who are satisfied with their living space. The positive notes about neighbors and the apartment imply a comfortable, personable environment where social and domestic life can unfold without the same tensions highlighted in the negative account.

Taken together, these reviews illustrate a spectrum of experiences within the same property. The negative narrative highlights critical failings in staff behavior, access control, and respect for clients with special caregiving needs. It paints a picture of a building where fear, frustration, and mistrust can dominate daily interactions, especially at moments when a resident most needs support. The positive review, in contrast, underscores a sense of community and satisfaction with the physical space, suggesting that for some residents, the day-to-day experience is pleasant and unproblematic.

This juxtaposition also hints at underlying dynamics that could explain why experiences vary so widely. It may be that interactions with maintenance staff differ by shift, by individual, or by specific situations involving sensitive access to a disabled resident's home. It could reflect inconsistent procedures for granting entry to caregivers or gaps in communication and training around accessibility and respectful conduct. It might also suggest that the building's environment can feel very different depending on which area one visits, which unit one occupies, or whom one encounters in common spaces.

For someone evaluating this place, the two accounts together underscore the importance of gathering multiple perspectives. A resident who values a warm, neighborly atmosphere and a well-kept apartment might be very happy here, while a caregiver or family member focused on consistent, respectful handling of accessibility and care needs could encounter serious concerns. The overall message is one of contrast: a property that can offer both a supportive, pleasant living environment and a troubling, stressful experience, depending on who you interact with and what situation arises.

This area of Rome, New York, offers a variety of amenities and services that may be appealing to seniors looking for a convenient and vibrant community. With a selection of restaurants such as Arby's, Subway, and La Roma Pizzeria nearby, there are plenty of dining options easily accessible. Additionally, pharmacies like Walgreens and Rite Aid are within close proximity for any medical needs. The presence of parks like Lee Town Park and Franklin Field provide opportunities for outdoor recreation and relaxation. For healthcare services, Rome Memorial Hospital is conveniently located in the vicinity. Transportation options are available through Hillside Taxidermy if needed. Overall, this area offers a mix of conveniences and resources that could make it a favorable choice for senior living in Rome.

Restaurants

• Arby's (0.1 miles)
• Subway (0.1 miles)
• La Roma Pizzeria (0.2 miles)
• The Vigneto Restaurant (0.3 miles)
• Coalyard Charlie's (0.5 miles)
• Franklin Hotel (0.6 miles)
• KFC (0.6 miles)

Parks

• Lee Town Park (0.4 miles)
• Franklin Field (0.8 miles)
• Vogel Park (1.1 miles)
• Guyer Field (1.2 miles)
• Marcy Town Park (9.7 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (0.5 miles)
• Rite Aid (0.8 miles)
• Walgreens (1.3 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (3.1 miles)
• Rite Aid (10.1 miles)
• Langdon's Apothecary (10.2 miles)
• Kinney Drugs (10.4 miles)

Cafes

• Copperccino's (0.5 miles)
• Panera Bread (10.9 miles)
• Starbucks (10.9 miles)
• Raspberries Cafe (11 miles)

Hospitals

• Rome Memorial Hospital (0.5 miles)
• Rome Memorial Hospital (1.2 miles)
• Central New York Psychiatric Center (8.2 miles)
• Faxton-St Luke's Healthcare (10.5 miles)

Physicians

• Sleep Disorders Center At Rome (1.2 miles)
• Mohawk Valley Women's Health Associates (1.4 miles)
• Robert Mitchell Rubinovich (1.4 miles)
• Mohawk Glen Radiology (1.4 miles)
• Mohawk Glen Urgent Care (1.4 miles)
• Cotronea Anthony M MD (1.4 miles)
• Mohawk Glen Center For Community Health (1.4 miles)

Places of Worship

• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (4.8 miles)
• Delta Lake Bible Conference Center (5.6 miles)
• Faith Alliance Church (5.9 miles)
• Beacon Light Baptist Church (9.1 miles)

Transportation

• Hillside Taxidermy (9.7 miles)

Theaters

• Marquee Cinemas - Orchard 14 (10.8 miles)