513 Brick Street SE, Bondurant, IA 50035
To contact a resident: (515) 967-7219
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Candleridge Apartments
Pros
The residents are described as great.- The property is promoted as quality housing at an affordable price.
- The community room and onsite laundry are available.
Cons
The management does not look after residents.- The accommodations are old, with outdated cupboards and appliances, and replacements are equally old.
- When appliances break, they are replaced with more old ones, including the washers.
- Residents have to walk through rain and unplowed snow to do laundry in a community center that has only two washers and dryers.
- The management removed gardens, the library, and kitchen equipment, making life harder and less enjoyable.
- It is not a happy place to live, and one would not recommend living there.
- Flowers and umbrellas on patios are being removed, with only a couple of chairs and limited shade.
Review
Candleridge Apartments in Bondurant, IA is best suited for budget-conscious adults who want basic, community-oriented living and can tolerate older interiors and uneven maintenance. This is a setting where affordability and social access matter most, not pristine apartments or proactive, hands-on management. It will primarily appeal to residents who value a lower rent floor, an on-site social hub, and the practicality of a shared laundry space, while living with the trade-off of dated finishes and irregular upkeep.
Those considering alternatives should focus on residents who require consistently well-maintained units, modern appliances, and reliable, responsive management. If modern kitchen equipment, updated cabinetry, steady groundskeeping, and tangible daily reliability are non-negotiable, this is not the right fit. Families or individuals who expect robust outdoor spaces, well-kept gardens, and quiet, well-ordered common areas may find better aligns elsewhere. Also, anyone who prizes extensive on-site services and prompt problem resolution should look at other options first.
The strongest practical positives here are tangible and lifecycle-friendly: the community room and on-site laundry provide a practical social and daily-use draw, and the overall cost structure tends to be affordable. Residents who mesh with a resident-driven, low-cost model can find a sense of belonging among neighbors, and the presence of a community room encourages connection without extra travel. The people living there are noted as a high point, generally described as great, which helps counterbalance some of the facility’s rough edges and can soften the impact of slower maintenance cycles.
Yet the catalog of cons is persistent and tangible. Management is frequently characterized as a major weakness, with complaints that the leadership does not look after residents or their evolving needs. The removal of familiar conveniences, gardens, a library, and kitchen equipment, strips away elements that once made daily life more comfortable and enjoyable. Interiors are described as old, with dated cupboards and appliances, and even when replacements occur, they tend to be older models. The laundry setup, while useful, is limited to two washers and dryers in a single center, awkwardly placed and not immune to weather, staff or residents must traipse through rain and unplowed snow to access it. Outdoor spaces and patios are increasingly restricted, with flowers, shade options, or even basic personal touches tamped down.
The key question becomes whether the practical benefits can offset these drawbacks. For a resident who prioritizes affordable housing and does not require a turnkey living environment, the combination of low rent, community amenities, and the chance to connect with neighbors may justify the gaps in maintenance and updates. The on-site laundry and the social room mitigate some daily frictions by reducing trips off-site and fostering informal support networks. However, the loss of personal outdoor space and the ongoing management issues undermine satisfaction for anyone who values a home that feels cared for and responsive.
In the end, the decision hinges on priorities and risk tolerance. If cost is the overriding priority and the resident can adapt to older finishes, limited facilities, and inconsistent upkeep, Candleridge offers concrete value and a welcoming community texture. If newer appliances, proactive property care, and stronger outdoor cultivation are essential, alternatives should be explored. Prospective renters should demand a candid tour, test the reliability of the laundry facilities during peak times, inquire about any planned improvements, and speak with current residents about how responsive management actually is on day-to-day concerns. The right choice aligns with a practical balance: appreciating affordable housing and social access while accepting that this community will not deliver a premium living environment.
Independent Living
Des Moines International (15 miles away)
Understanding the Nuances of Palliative Care and Hospice: A Comprehensive Exploration
Fecal Incontinence in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Guide
Recognizing the Journey: Understanding and Navigating Anticipatory Grief