Brentwood at Elkhart IL Costs & Pricing
Brentwood at Elkhart, IL offers competitive pricing for its accommodations when compared to both Elkhart County and the broader state of Indiana. For a one-bedroom unit, residents can expect to pay $2,770 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $3,660 and also more affordable than the state average of $3,300. Similarly, two-bedroom options at Brentwood are priced at $3,179, again offering a better value in comparison to the county's average of $3,785 and remaining close to the state's average of $3,208. These figures reflect Brentwood's commitment to providing high-quality living environments while maintaining affordability in the local market.
| Floor plans | Brentwood at Elkhart IL | Elkhart County | Indiana |
|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $2,770 | $3,660 | $3,300 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,179 | $3,785 | $3,208 |
Independent Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Cedarhurst of Edison Lakes
$2,700 to $3,800 / month
13.0 miles away
-
from -$417 / mo
St. Paul's
$2,353 to $3,308 / month
15.7 miles away
-
from -$470 / mo
Waterford Crossing
$2,300 to $3,200 / month
12.3 miles away
-
from -$270 / mo
Tanglewood Trace
$2,500 to $4,200 / month
13.8 miles away
-
About the same
Woodland Terrace of Longmeadow
$2,845 to $3,295 / month
21.7 miles away
Overall Review of Brentwood at Elkhart IL
differentiator
3 reviews mention this
Affordability stands out
Residents specifically mention affordability and value for the money.
Several residents and families say the cost was a big reason they chose Brentwood, and they also describe the overall value as good. This lines up with the community’s pricing appearing below county and state benchmarks for both 1- and 2-bedroom apartments. A family also described the move as working out well financially while their loved one stayed in independent living as long as possible.
common
17 reviews mention this
Staff feel welcoming and attentive
Residents consistently describe staff as friendly, caring, and helpful.
Across many reviews, residents and families describe the staff as welcoming and treating people with care. Cleanliness is also repeatedly tied to staff routines, with multiple comments calling the community spotless and well-kept. A few reviewers go further, saying staff are supportive and attentive to residents’ needs, including residents with more severe disabilities in specific situations.
common
10 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Residents and families say activities help people stay active.
Multiple reviews mention regular entertainment, outings, and a busy activity calendar that makes it easier to settle in. Families also describe residents as staying engaged and participating, including through organized events. The community’s activities offerings appear to match what residents look for in independent living.
caveat
11 reviews mention this
Dining quality is a mixed picture
Dining gets praise, but some residents report inconsistencies.
Dining is one of the most discussed topics: several residents say meals are very good, nutritious, and served in a way that feels organized for daily life. At the same time, some reviews describe food as hit-or-miss, with complaints that dinners are not as good as breakfasts or that the food is not the best overall. There are also comments that the team provides alternatives if a resident doesn’t like something, which can help when preferences vary.
caveat
3 reviews mention this
Communication is sometimes uneven
Some families say communication can be less clear than they want.
While a few reviews describe communication as good and include positive feedback on how well the team updates residents and families, others say it can be unclear. One family specifically notes they heard about changes from other residents rather than staff. Another review highlights communication with a resident and their family as a point of strength, suggesting experiences may depend on the situation.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Some care needs may be beyond reach
A couple of reviews suggest the community may not fit escalating needs.
Two reviews raise concerns that the level of care needed eventually outpaced what the community could safely provide. One family says they were comfortable overall but believed their loved one might need more care than the community was able to provide. Another describes staff support during a transition, but later felt the situation became unsafe as their loved one became too impaired.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.