Independent Order of Foresters

Cons

• The representatives, supervisors, and managers are deceitful and dishonest, saying whatever they think the customer wants to hear.
• The company enrolled customers in life insurance without their consent, despite a quote they did not want.
• The company debited customers' accounts for almost a year without authorization.
• The company refused to refund the unauthorized debits after disputes.
• The reviewers feel defrauded and claim the company is fraudulent.
• The company is described as crooks who take money without consent.

Review

A troubling complaint unfolds around a company whose representatives, supervisors, and managers allegedly operate with a persuading rhetoric designed to win approval rather than to disclose facts. The narrator asserts that those in leadership positions will say whatever they think the customer wants to hear, framing their behavior as deceitful and dishonest. This opening description casts a shadow over the entire engagement, suggesting a pattern where claims are crafted to satisfy a customer's immediate desires rather than to reflect accurate terms or transparent processes. In this account, the sentiment is not merely frustration but a conviction that misrepresentation is embedded in how the company conducts its outreach and sells products.

The reviewer goes on to describe an unwanted enrollment in life insurance. They make a clear distinction: they did not want the policy, and yet the company proceeded to enroll them anyway. The implications go beyond a simple oversight; they frame the action as unauthorized and coercive. The resulting financial activity is described as a debit from their account that stretched across nearly a year. The core accusation is that consent was never given for this coverage or the associated charges, positioning the company's actions as a breach of trust and a fundamental violation of the customer's control over their own financial decisions.

In detailing the financial impact, the reviewer emphasizes the persistence of unauthorized debits over a long period. Despite repeated disputes, the money continued to be taken, which intensifies the sense of injustice. The narrative highlights a turning point when the company finally stopped debiting the account, but the relief is tempered by the unresolved issue of refunds. The crux of the grievance is not just the initial enrollment but the ongoing, unduly long disruption to the customer's finances and the feeling that the company neither acknowledged nor corrected the harm in a timely manner.

After the debits ceased, the customer sought restitution for funds that were never consented to be withdrawn. The account of events portrays a firm refusal from the company to refund the disputed amounts. The reviewer frames this denial as part of a broader pattern of fraud, insisting that the company misled them and profited from actions taken without authorization. The language used - referring to fraudulent behavior and to the company as crooks - signals a strong emotional reaction to what is perceived as deliberate wrongdoing, rather than a mere administrative error.

The concluding portion of the account leaves no ambiguity about the reviewer's stance: the company is not trustworthy and should not be engaged under any circumstances. The warning is stark and emphatic: do not hire this company for anything. The reviewer's caution comes from a culmination of misrepresentation, unauthorized enrollment, persistent financial impact, disputed refunds, and a sense of being treated as a nuisance rather than a valued customer. The underlying message is a call for vigilance and accountability, urging others to scrutinize consent, billing practices, and the responsiveness of the company when problems are raised.

Taken together, the narrative paints a comprehensive picture of a negative customer experience built on claims of deceit, unauthorized product enrollment, and unresolved financial loss. While these assertions reflect the reviewer's perspective, they underscore a broader concern about how consent is obtained, how charges are authorized and disputed, and how a company responds when a customer pushes back. For potential customers, the account serves as a cautionary tale emphasizing the importance of clear written consent, transparent pricing, and responsive customer service that addresses disputes promptly and fairly. It invites readers to examine not only what is offered, but how it is offered, and what recourse exists if agreements are not honored.

Parks

• Trimble Park (0.7 miles)
• Donnelly Park (2.9 miles)
• Lake Idamere Park (5 miles)
• Eustis Lake Walk (6.7 miles)
• Trout Lake Nature (7.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• St Patrick Catholic Church of Mt Dora (2.6 miles)
• First Baptist Church of Mount Dora (2.9 miles)
• First United Methodist Church (3 miles)
• First Church Kidz (6.1 miles)

Restaurants

• WAVE Asian Bistro & Sushi (2.8 miles)
• The Bavarian Haus (2.8 miles)
• The Frog And Monkey (2.8 miles)
• Jeremiah's (3.1 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (3.9 miles)
• Taco Bell (3.9 miles)
• Jersey Mike's (3.9 miles)

Physicians

• Jack - Jack Cassell Cassell MD (3 miles)
• Adult Medicine of Lake County (3.6 miles)
• Akumin (3.6 miles)
• Keith C Charles (4 miles)
• Mid Florida Eye Center (4 miles)
• Gregory J Panzo (4 miles)
• Dermatology Group PA (4 miles)

Theaters

• Epic Theatres (3.7 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (4.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.5 miles)
• Walgreens (4.7 miles)
• Winn-Dixie (5.1 miles)
• Walgreens (5.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (5.2 miles)
• Lake Pharmacy (6.7 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (4.5 miles)
• Starbucks (4.6 miles)
• Starbucks (8 miles)

Hospitals

• AdventHealth Waterman (5 miles)
• Florida Hospital Waterman (5 miles)
• Lrmc Riverside Urgent Care Center (7.1 miles)

Transportation

• Orlando Country Airport (X04) (6.6 miles)