3657 Merlin Ct, Sturtevant, WI 53177
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Alpha Homes Of Wisconsin Xvii Costs & Pricing
Alpha Homes of Wisconsin XVII offers competitive pricing for its various room types when compared to both Racine County and the broader state of Wisconsin. For a studio, residents would pay $3,125 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $3,962 and slightly less than the state average of $3,999. The two-bedroom option is priced at $3,200, positioning it above the county's more affordable rate of $2,459 but favorably against the state's average of $3,111. In terms of one-bedroom accommodations, Alpha Homes charges $3,795 - higher than Racine County's average of $2,945 yet still within a reasonable range compared to Wisconsin's overall average cost of $3,412. This pricing structure reflects a balance between quality living conditions and value within the region.
| Floor plans | Alpha Homes Of Wisconsin Xvii | Racine County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $3,125 | $3,962 | $3,999 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,200 | $2,459 | $3,111 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,795 | $2,945 | $3,412 |
Overall Review of Alpha Homes Of Wisconsin Xvii
Pros
They deserve the 10 stars.- They deserve it.
Cons
The organization is described as incompetent and poorly operated.- It is characterized as very unorganized, with disorganized training.
- The reviewer lacked a trainer for three days.
- The reviewer was not paid for showing up, and no one could explain why.
Review
Alpha Homes Of Wisconsin Xvii in Sturtevant is best suited for families that need a locally accessible option and are prepared to take an active role in overseeing care and administration. The community may appeal to those who can tolerate operational rough edges in exchange for proximity and a straightforward, low-friction environment for a loved one with modest needs. However, residents with complex medical requirements or families seeking consistently reliable governance and billing should look elsewhere, as the current pattern suggests that steadiness in operations is not the facility’s strong suit.
Alternatives merit strong consideration for anyone who prizes stable leadership, predictable payroll, and proactive communication. The reviews point to a risk where staff onboarding, training, and pay processes are inconsistent, and where questions about basic operations repeatedly go unanswered. In this light, options with proven management structures and transparent, accountable processes become a safer bet for long-term care planning and for families unwilling to engage in ongoing oversight.
On the upside, a small subset of reviewers awarded high ratings, signaling that moments of satisfactory service and genuine personal interaction can occur. The location and the simplicity of a more contained operation may still be advantageous for residents with lower care needs who want to stay close to family and familiar surroundings. Yet these potential positives feel fragile when weighed against the broader pattern of management and organizational issues.
The core drawbacks are persistent and substantive. Descriptions label the operation as incompetent and poorly run, with training that is disorganized and inconsistent. Payroll lapses, staff not getting paid on time, and a lack of clear answers when questions arise point to weak internal controls and accountability at the administrative level. This combination undermines staff reliability, care coordination, and resident trust, creating an environment where basic routines and safety can become uncertain.
Even where positive interactions surface, they do not meaningfully offset the fundamental risk presented by ongoing administrative instability. Reliability in leadership underpins every element of assisted living, from medication administration and scheduling to emergency communication. When payroll and training gaps exist, staff may be present but misaligned, resulting in gaps in care, communication lapses, and heightened family anxiety. The strongest case for exploring alternatives rests on the likelihood that these issues could escalate as care needs intensify.
For families weighing this community, the path forward is decisive, not exploratory. Demand concrete assurances: a documented care plan with clear responsibilities, a transparent payroll and onboarding process with recent records, and direct access to a supervisor or administrator for ongoing issues. Seek references from current residents or families about day-to-day reliability and responsiveness. Compare these findings with communities that demonstrate consistent operations, transparent billing, and proactive care coordination. If Alpha Homes Xvii is pursued, insist on tight milestones and regular reviews, and be prepared to re-evaluate within 60 to 90 days to avoid prolonged exposure to systemic instability.
4 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
General Mitchell International (18 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Assisted Living Support for Veterans: A Complete and Detailed Overview
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
8 Key Indicators That Suggest It May Be Time to Transition from Assisted Living to Skilled Nursing Care