2135 North 39 Th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53208
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Living Made Easy Homes Site 2
Cons
The group home neglected the son.- He deteriorated from using a walker to unable to get out of bed after a few months.
- He became so weak he couldn't sit up in bed.
- An ambulance was called and he was transported to freodert hospital.
- He was discharged to a nursing home.
- He was diagnosed with malnutrition and vitamin B deficiency.
- His weight dropped from 160 to 116 pounds at discharge.
- The reviewer warns others not to trust the facility with a loved one.
Review
Living Made Easy Homes Site 2 in Milwaukee is best suited for families seeking a compact, home‑like setting where an adult resident can receive daily living assistance without moving into a larger, institutional-style facility. The environment may appeal to those who value intimate staff interactions and a small footprint that feels more like a private home than a hospital ward. This community can work for seniors or adults with moderate needs who do not require constant medical intervention, and for families prioritizing close, day‑to‑day oversight of routines such as bathing, dressing, and meal preparation.
However, prospective residents should weigh mixed signals from the review pool carefully. The site carries two five‑star ratings alongside two one‑star ratings, suggesting experiences vary widely. In practice, this dispersion often points to inconsistent care quality, staffing challenges, or differences in individual expectations and needs. The strongest red flag among the reported experiences is a neglect allegation that had lasting health consequences, underscoring the risk that a small‑scale setting can falter when supervision or accountability is insufficient.
From the most troubling account, the core concern centers on care oversight. The resident’s decline, loss of mobility, inability to sit up or leave bed, severe malnutrition and vitamin deficiency, led to hospitalization and a transfer to a nursing facility. This narrative triggers essential questions about staff‑to‑resident ratios, training in nutrition and daily mobility support, and the facility’s capacity to recognize warning signs before health deterioration occurs. It highlights the danger of a boutique model when external accountability and routine monitoring are not reliably in place.
In practice, the upside of a small, home‑like environment is the potential for familiar routines and more personalized attention. When staffing is steady and attentive, this model can deliver dependable supervision and timely assistance with mobility, meals, and medication reminders. Yet the weight of the documented case shows that this model’s strengths cannot fully offset serious cons without robust, consistent oversight. A single lapse can have outsized consequences for a highly vulnerable resident, and that risk materialized in a way that cannot be ignored.
For families weighing options, prioritize facilities with transparent staffing metrics, dietary supervision, and medical oversight. Key questions should include: what are current staff‑to‑resident ratios by shift; what credentials do front‑line caregivers hold; is there an on‑site nurse or regular medical professional; how is nutrition monitored (weight checks, dietitian oversight, meal plans); what are emergency response times; and can state inspection reports and incident logs be reviewed. Request sample menus and a written care plan that shows how nutrition, hydration, mobility, and daily activities are managed. If selecting a small home, insist on regular external oversight, clear incident reporting, and demonstrated accountability.
Bottom line: Living Made Easy Homes Site 2 presents the appeal of a warm, intimate setting alongside the risk of inadequate care if supervision slips. For families prioritizing a warm, home‑like atmosphere with strong oversight and verifiable quality controls, the community could meet those needs if compelling assurances are in place. For those where any risk of neglect or nutritional decline is unacceptable, it is prudent to explore alternatives, larger, well‑staffed assisted living communities with proven quality metrics and robust medical oversight. The decision should hinge on verified staffing stability, nutrition management, and immediate access to medical support, with thorough tours, conversations with current residents or families, and careful review of records before making a commitment.
3 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
General Mitchell International (8 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Hospice waiver
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Comprehensive memory care with 24/7 supervision, dementia programming, ADL support, meals, housekeeping, and transportation.
Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences
Are Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease Lethal? A Comprehensive Exploration
Exploring the Power of Reminiscence Therapy for Individuals With Dementia