2133 North 39 Th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53208
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Living Made Easy Homes Site 1
Cons
The group home neglected the son. - After a few months, he couldn't even get out of bed on his own.
- He was so weak he couldn't sit up in his bed.
- An ambulance was called and he was transported to freodert hospital.
- He was discharged to a nursing home.
- He was diagnosed with malnutrition and vitamin B deficiency.
- His weight dropped from 160 pounds to 116 pounds at discharge.
Review
Living Made Easy Homes Site 1 in Milwaukee is best suited for families seeking a compact, home-like living arrangement where residents are known personally and visits are straightforward. The setting operates as a small group home, and when care is reliably staffed, it can offer predictable routines and closer day-to-day oversight than a larger campus. This option appealingly fits residents who do not require constant hospital-level monitoring but still benefit from direct caregiver attention and a less institutional atmosphere. In short, it can be a good match for households prioritizing intimacy, accessibility, and the potential for staff-resident relationships to form, so long as essential safety and quality controls are consistently in place.
However, the risk profile here is amplified by stark, troubling experiences reported by families. One account describes a resident who arrived able to walk with a walker and later deteriorated to the point of being unable to sit up or get out of bed, with rapid weight loss and a diagnosis of malnutrition and vitamin B deficiency. The individual required ambulance transport and discharge to a nursing facility, a trajectory that signals grave concerns about medical monitoring, nutrition, and responsive care. Such a single, severe incident cannot be dismissed, and it casts a long shadow over the community’s overall reliability. With two one-star reports among four reviews, the divide in experiences is not subtle: the facility is clearly capable of producing deeply troubling outcomes in at least some cases.
The principal con is unmistakable: care quality and safety appear uneven, with at least one trajectory of neglect that culminated in hospitalization and a substantial decline in health. This is not a minor lapse but a failure with consequences that jeopardize a resident’s immediate safety and long-term well-being. When serious neglect leads to malnutrition and loss of mobility, the entire premise of a small, home-like setting, personal attention and timely intervention, fails to deliver. The inconsistent performance implied by the reviews means families cannot rely on stable, predictable standards without rigorous, ongoing verification and oversight.
On the flip side, the limited, intimate format can offer advantages if properly managed. A smaller operation has the potential to enable quicker recognition of subtle changes in a resident’s condition, more frequent observation, and a level of responsiveness that larger facilities struggle to match. If staffing is steady, well-trained, and reinforced by strong care plans, the very elements omitted in the negative episode, close supervision, timely assistance, and consistent routines, could offset the drawbacks. The mixed rating implies that when a certain level of governance, accountability, and daily structure is in place, some residents and families experience a workable, even satisfying arrangement.
During decisions, several concrete steps distinguish prudent choices from risky ones. Prospective residents should request up-to-date licensing and inspection histories, ask for the exact staff-to-resident ratio across shifts, and review meal plans, nutritional oversight, and daily mobility assistance procedures. Insist on seeing current care plans, incident logs, and any corrective action plans following past concerns. Speak with current residents and families about responsiveness, timeliness, and the ability to adjust care as needs evolve. Tour the facility during different times of day to gauge consistency, attentiveness, and the practice of hands-on caregiving.
Bottom line: Living Made Easy Homes Site 1 is a high-stakes option that can work for the right resident, but only under a framework of rigorous oversight and verifiable quality controls. For residents with significant medical fragility, nutritional vulnerabilities, or a history of rapid functional decline, stronger clinical support and stricter safety assurances should steer families toward alternatives with demonstrated, consistent performance. If selecting this community, approach it with a disciplined plan: insist on transparent metrics, schedule regular care-plan reviews, and prepare for vigilant follow-ups to ensure care quality remains stable over time.
3 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
General Mitchell International (8 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Hospice waiver
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Assisted living with diabetic care and on-site activities.
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies