5729 North 96 Th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53225
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Coming Of Age Healthcare House II
Pros
The place is very nice and clean.- There is a nice worker there.
- They would place their mother or father there for good care.
Cons
Some staff are disrespectful.- A bum brat steals from the elderly.
Review
Coming Of Age Healthcare House II in Milwaukee is best suited for families seeking a compact, personable setting where an elderly parent or relative can settle into a clean, orderly environment and receive straightforward daily support. The facility’s appeal rests on a calm atmosphere and staff who can deliver basic caregiving tasks without drama. For residents who prioritize a welcoming vibe and predictable routines over a wide range of medical amenities, this community can offer a reassuring home base. Potential residents should be prepared for a setting that feels more intimate than a larger campus, with the attendant strengths and limits that accompany small operations.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are seniors who require highly reliable staffing, robust supervision, and a track record of zero tolerance for misconduct. If consistent, respectful interactions with every staff member and transparent incident reporting are non-negotiable, this community may fall short. Families seeking specialized care, advanced medical management, or a facility with a larger care team and more structured programs should explore other options. Additionally, if financial integrity and safeguards against theft are paramount, the red flags raised by the available feedback warrant caution and a closer look at governance and internal controls before committing.
On the upside, the property reads as very neat and clean, and the reviews highlight a positive, approachable staff member who would encourage a family to place trust in the care. A clean, orderly environment reduces daily stress and can ease transitions for residents and family members alike. A genuinely helpful caregiver or two can make a meaningful difference in day-to-day experience, particularly for residents who respond to personal attention and a friendly, patient demeanor. Taken together, these positives establish a baseline where basic needs are met with warmth, and that can be enough to offset some doubts about a smaller operation.
However, the darker notes cannot be dismissed. One reviewer points to disrespectful behavior among some staff, which can erode confidence and daily safety. Worse, there is a serious allegation of a staff member stealing from an elderly resident. Even if this is an isolated claim or not fully substantiated in public records, it signals a potential governance weakness and a risk that families must weigh heavily. In a setting where elders rely on routine oversight, such concerns should prompt thorough questions about supervision, anti-fraud measures, and how incidents are detected and resolved.
The clean environment and occasional positive staff interactions do offer some offset, but only if accompanied by strong, verifiable safeguards. Prospective buyers should demand explicit policies on staff background checks, daily supervision, incident reporting, and resident protections. Watching a tour and asking about caregiver assignments, shift coverage, and who oversees care plans can reveal whether the positives can realistically shield against the cons. In short, there is a trade-off: comfort and charm versus governance risk. If the facility can demonstrate credible oversight and transparent handling of any misconduct, the balance tilts toward a practical choice; if not, alternatives with firmer reputations will win out.
Bottom line: Coming Of Age Healthcare House II may be a practical fit for families prioritizing a clean, welcoming environment and personable caregiving, provided comfort with the potential governance concerns. It is less suitable for those who demand ironclad assurances about staffing reliability and elder financial protection, or for families needing robust oversight and a proven track record. For decision-makers, the step is to compare this community with higher-rated options that offer steadier staffing, stronger fraud protections, and clearer accountability. If choosing this house, insist on concrete safeguards, visible management engagement, and a clear plan for ongoing resident monitoring.
4 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
General Mitchell International (14 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Hospice waiver
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Dementia-Related Hallucinations: Causes, Experiences, and Practical Approaches
Illuminating Insights About Alzheimer's Disease: Ten Crucial Realities
A Thorough Discussion of Medications Potentially Linked to Dementia Risk