522 W Bergen Dr, Fox Point, WI 53217
To contact a resident: (414) 745-3053
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Bergen Manor Costs & Pricing
At Bergen Manor, the monthly cost for a private room is $5,000, which positions it above both Ozaukee County and the broader Wisconsin state averages. Ozaukee County reports an average of $4,571 for similar accommodations, while Wisconsin's state average is even lower at $4,339. This pricing reflects Bergen Manor's commitment to providing exceptional care and amenities that may contribute to the higher cost compared to its local and state counterparts. Families considering this option will want to weigh these costs against the quality of services and support that Bergen Manor offers in order to make an informed decision about their loved one's care.
| Floor plans | Bergen Manor | Ozaukee County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $5,000 | $4,571 | $4,339 |
Overall Review of Bergen Manor
Cons
The place is basically a halfway house for addicts.- There is little chance of recovery here.
- The staff is exceptionally grouchy and eye-rolling is strongly looked down upon.
- The place allegedly invites fighting with residents and staff.
- There is no helpful therapy here.
- The managers are described as taking money and selling lip service to extract payments for this crazy insane asylum.
- This place is a first-rate joke.
- The residents are mostly elderly and in their last days, with nothing to do but chase flies away.
Review
Bergen Manor in Fox Point is best suited for no one who expects a respectful, service-oriented assisted-living experience. The reviews paint a picture of a setting where safety, dignity, and purposeful daily living are severely compromised. Families evaluating options should dismiss this community if the goal is reliable care, social engagement, and professional staff. If Bergen Manor remains under consideration, it should be treated as a last resort for residents who can tolerate a tense, restrictive atmosphere, minimal programming, and a culture that seems indifferent to comfort. In short, this is not a viable fit for typical seniors seeking help with routine living and a stable, caring environment.
For decision-making, explicit alternatives deserve emphasis. Families should compare facilities with transparent staffing, consistent oversight, and robust activity calendars that foster social interaction and mental stimulation. Look for communities that offer verifiable physical therapy, rehabilitation services, and a culture of responsive problem-solving. If medical supervision, safety, and meaningful engagement are priorities, Bergen Manor should be crossed off the short list in favor of options with demonstrable track records in resident welfare, clear policies, and a welcoming atmosphere.
From the limited positives that surface in the reviews, the only potential advantage is a stated openness to external therapists. However, this barely softens the overall picture, because there is no substantive commitment to ongoing therapy, rehabilitation, or structured activity. The mere possibility of bringing in a therapist cannot compensate for a day-to-day experience described as moodily managed, unhelpful, and lacking in genuine care. In practical terms, the one faint pro is vastly outweighed by the absence of meaningful programming and the prevailing impression of neglect or indifference.
The main cons dominate the narrative and should drive a decisive reconsideration. Residents are portrayed as elderly individuals with little to contribute beyond existing in a confined setting, which hints at inadequate programming and a lack of purpose-built activity. Reported conditions include a presence of flies and a sense of neglect, which raises concerns about cleanliness and comfort. Movement is described as restricted, with a culture that feels more like wardenship than supportive living. Staff are characterized as grouchy and unhelpful, and there is a palpable gap in actual therapy or rehabilitative care. Taken together, these factors create a risk profile that contrasts starkly with the expectations of safe, respectful, and empowering senior living.
If Bergen Manor must be explored further, pursue a rigorous due diligence process. Request a candid tour with the administrator, obtain the latest state inspection findings, and review a current weekly activity calendar along with schedules for any physical therapy, occupational therapy, or other rehabilitation services. Speak directly with current residents about day-to-day life, safety, and staff responsiveness. Verify staffing ratios, turnover, training, and the availability of on-site medical oversight. Insist on a trial period or clearly defined exit terms, and compare promises with outcomes at comparable facilities. Only if the answers are concrete and reassuring should consideration continue; otherwise move on to alternatives with proven care standards.
Bottom line: Bergen Manor does not align with the core expectations of safe, engaging, resident-centered senior living. It is a setting to avoid for families prioritizing reliable care, dignity, and meaningful daily structure. For most, the recommended approach is to pursue facilities with strong caregiving teams, transparent operations, and accessible rehabilitation services. If a resident’s circumstances force consideration of a highly restrictive, low-engagement environment, Bergen Manor may be contemplated as a last resort, only after confirming a credible plan to address basic needs, safety, and basic human dignity.
Board and Care Home
Private
General Mitchell International (14 miles away)
Strong access to nearby healthcare, dining, parks, and transportation enhances convenience and well-being.
Navigating the Tax Landscape of Caregiving: Credits, Deductions, and Beyond
Highly Beneficial Low-Impact Exercises for Senior Living Residents
Is In-Home Healthcare Tax Deductible? Your Comprehensive Guide