N4635 Co Road Y, Jefferson, WI 53549
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of St Coletta Of Wi St Clare
Pros
The organization cared for Rosemary Kennedy. - The organization provided long-term care for a relative for over 50 years, earning praise for dedication and love.
- They have amazing staff and programs to meet individual needs.
- Georgi Ann lived at St Coletta's on two occasions and later returned to live there for the remainder of her years.
- St Coletta's is a one-of-a-kind institution, staffed by exceptional professionals who serve very special people.
- The reviewer expresses indebtedness to St Coletta's beyond measure.
- The school is described as very good.
Cons
Horrible driver(s) that endanger the lives of their passengers and others on the road.- The photo posted is of a st coletta employee driving while using their cell phone.
Review
St Coletta Of Wi St Clare in Jefferson is best suited for families seeking a long-term, highly individualized care environment for loved ones with special needs or lifelong care requirements, where a mission-driven culture and deep staff familiarity dominate the experience. The facility is portrayed as a one-of-a-kind institution, backed by decades of dedicated service and a history of personal connections with residentsâ families. Testimonials emphasize a culture of care, with mentions of long residency by relatives and acknowledgment of the organizationâs impact on generations. This is not a generic assisted-living option; it is a specialized setting where staff relationships and continuity matter more than glossy amenities.
Pros are most compelling for families that value personalized programs and sustained, hands-on engagement. Reviewers consistently describe âamazing staff and programs to meet individual needs,â and stories about relatives who thrived there across years and even generations reinforce the sense of trusted continuity. The words of gratitude from families, one noting lifelong devotion and another recounting a relativeâs two separate stays with the mother eventually joining the community, underline a core strength: staff who know residents deeply, adapt to changing needs, and sustain a stable caregiving environment. In short, the operation leverages a compassionate, experienced team to deliver tailored, person-centered care that can be hard to find elsewhere.
Yet, the community faces notable safety and reliability concerns that potential entrants must weigh carefully. A subset of reviews flags transportation and driver safety as a significant risk, describing incidents where drivers allegedly used cell phones or otherwise behaved in ways that could endanger passengers and nearby motorists. Even if isolated in perception or reporting, these comments create a red flag about the transportation component of care and the oversight around staff operating vehicles. For families with strong needs or strict expectations about transport safety and dependability, these reports merit serious consideration and direct inquiry before committing.
Those same safety concerns intersect with the broader reality of the ratings. The community presents a mixed picture: a majority of five-star endorsements alongside several one-star accounts. That volatility signals that experiences can be highly varied, likely depending on location, shift, or specific staff assignments. This inconsistency matters because it directly affects daily reliability, especially for families relying on supervised transport, regular routines, and predictable communication. The imbalance between glowing tributes and sharp safety critiques should guide families to probe concrete policies, incidents, and corrective steps with administrators before forming a judgment.
When evaluating offset between pros and cons, the balance tilts in favor of families who prioritize a deeply anchored caregiving culture over the absence of other typical amenities. For residents whose needs align with long-term, relationship-rich care and for whom staff consistency and familial acknowledgment are decisive factors, the positives can substantially outweigh the transportation caveats. However, for those who cannot tolerate even a perceived risk in transit or who require highly dependable transport as a non-negotiable, this facility may feel risky or insufficient without clear assurances and documented safety improvements.
The prudent path forward centers on due diligence and a frank conversation with leadership. Families should request detailed explanations of transportation policies, driver training, incident reporting, and ongoing corrective actions. Visiting the campus to observe interactions, meet direct care staff, and hear from multiple families about recurring outcomes is essential. If the aim is to secure a residence that feels like a living extension of the family, with historically strong staff devotion and individualized programs, St Coletta Of Wi St Clare delivers that promise, provided transportation safety questions are satisfactorily addressed and a consistent, positive staff experience can be confirmed for the specific resident. If those conditions cannot be met, exploring alternatives with stronger transport reliability and demonstrable safety records is the prudent course.
4 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes