Paramount Senior Living At Cabell Midland Costs & Pricing
At Paramount Senior Living At Cabell Midland, the pricing for various room types is notably competitive when compared to both Cabell County and the broader state of West Virginia. For instance, residents can expect to pay $3,000 per month for a semi-private room, aligning perfectly with the average cost in Cabell County while representing a significant savings compared to the West Virginia state average of $3,683. Similarly, the two-bedroom option is priced at $3,020 - matching local rates yet significantly lower than the state average of $4,784. Studio accommodations are available for $3,360 at Paramount, consistent with county pricing but still offering a more affordable choice against the state average of $4,207. Finally, residents seeking one-bedroom apartments will pay $3,930 locally - once again matching Cabell County prices while remaining below the state's typical charge of $4,017. Overall, Paramount Senior Living At Cabell Midland provides a compelling value proposition for prospective residents looking for quality care without overstretching their budgets.
| Floor plans | Paramount Senior Living At Cabell Midland | Cabell County | West Virginia |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,683 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,020 | $3,020 | $4,784 |
| Studio | $3,360 | $3,360 | $4,207 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,930 | $3,930 | $4,017 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
The Wyngate Senior Living Community
$3,025 to $5,335 / month
6.2 miles away
-
from +$273 / mo
Celebration Villa of Teays Valley
$3,273 to $3,938 / month
14.9 miles away
-
from -$294 / mo
Rolling Meadows Place
$2,706 to $4,408 / month
16.1 miles away
-
About the same
Bellaire At Devonshire
$3,000 to $6,700 / month
16.6 miles away
Overall Review of Paramount Senior Living At Cabell Midland
common
18 reviews mention this
Clean rooms and no bad odors
Residents and families repeatedly describe the facility and rooms as clean and well kept.
Many reviewers say the building and residentsā rooms stay clean, with details like spotless rooms, clean bathrooms, and no nursing-home smell. A few also mention fast housekeeping responses when something comes up. Even some less-positive reviews still acknowledge cleanliness, separating the upkeep from other concerns. A recurring negative theme is the oppositeāsome families report problems like items missing or rooms kept locked in ways that created access issues during visits.
common
24 reviews mention this
Caring staff shows up daily
Across reviews, families describe staff as caring, attentive, and responsive to residents.
A large share of reviewers emphasize staff kindness and genuine concern for residents, including nurses and aides who treat people with dignity. Several describe frequent check-ins or communication with family, such as weekly updates or making them feel comfortable leaving a loved one. Some reviewers also praise specific individuals and day-to-day help with meals and daily living tasks. The main caveat is that a subset of reviews complain about staffing being short, delays with bathroom/shower help, and inconsistent attentiveness, especially with aides and call response.
common
12 reviews mention this
Food is a frequent bright spot
Food and dining support are a consistent theme, with many families calling it very good.
Several reviewers say the meals are good, often highlighting quality and that residents can get substitutions if needed. Others describe help with eating when assistance is required. The dining experience shows up alongside praise for a dining room people enjoy being in. On the downside, a few reviewers complain about food quality or limited options, and at least one says meals provided when residents cannot attend the dining room arrive later and are cold.
common
12 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Reviews often mention daily activities like games, bingo, and outings that help residents stay engaged.
Many reviewers describe a steady schedule of activities, including trivia, bingo, movie nights, parties, and planned outings. A few also mention special programming such as church services, devotional activities, and resident-centered gatherings. Some families say their loved ones stayed happy and social, and others mention an activities calendar. The caveat is that multiple reviews say activity quality or availability can slip, especially for residents who are less mobile or during periods affected by staffing or other disruptions.
caveat
10 reviews mention this
Care staffing and timing concerns
Some reviews raise concerns about staffing levels and delays in care responses.
While many families praise nursing and aides, several reviews describe periods of understaffing and slow responses when help is needed. Complaints include long waits for bathroom assistance, delays with showers, and call/response buttons not working reliably. A few reviews also express serious dissatisfaction with clinical outcomes, including injuries and issues noticed by families after transfers or hospitalizations. These concerns appear alongside reports of frequent staff changes in some periods.
caveat
4 reviews mention this
Pricing varies, with some praise for value
Pricing comes up inconsistently, with some calling it better value while others question costs or billing clarity.
A few reviewers frame the pricing as favorable compared with other communities, including one saying it was about half the price. Others still question value, describing the facility as overpriced for the level of care they felt they received. There are also mentions of billing being confusing or refunds taking a long time. In contrast to those negative experiences, some families describe clear comfort with the decision after touring and moving in.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.