2525 Eldersville Road, Fallansbee, WV 26037
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Mary Ann Manor
Pros
The new owners are very caring and awesome people.- They care about the residents as well as the staff.
- The staff are warm and pleasant people who take care of the residents as if they were family.
- This is one of the best places in the Ohio Valley.
- The new owners are outstanding people who will not disappoint.
- Mary Ann Manor will soon be an A++ facility.
Cons
The reviewer advises that this place should be avoided.
Review
Mary Ann Manor in Fallansbee, WV is best suited for families that prize a warm, home‑like atmosphere and hands‑on, resident‑centric care delivered by staff who feel more like extended family. The community reads as intimate and people‑driven, with caregivers who know residents’ routines, preferences, and histories. It appeals to families that want direct access to caregivers and a culture of consistently kind, respectful interactions. This is not a glossy, large‑campus operation; it feels like a small, tightly knit place where daily reassurance and personal attention carry real weight. For seniors who want a sense of belonging, supported by people who treat them with genuine warmth, Mary Ann Manor offers a compelling fit.
Those weighing alternatives should note that the very strength here, a caregiver‑led, personal culture, also invites scrutiny from families seeking a longer, more established track record. The picture is complicated by the small sample size of reviews and by a divergent sentiment that edges toward caution: one reviewer explicitly recommends taking a loved one elsewhere and points to Golden Oaks as a preferred option. If stability, a proven, multi‑year reputation, or a broader service mix are non‑negotiable, it makes sense to widen the search. For families prioritizing immediacy of results in programming or memory‑care capabilities, alternatives with more transparent histories may be warranted.
The strongest pros revolve around the new ownership and the staff’s warmth. The owners are described as caring and outstanding, with care staff who treat residents as if they were family. Such a culture translates into practical benefits: quicker responses to needs, respectful communication, and a daily sense that residents are more than tasks to be completed. In a market where care quality can hinge on leadership stability, this personal, resident‑focused approach provides a meaningful counterweight to concerns about a transition period. Families can reasonably expect daily life to feel supportive, with staff who remain attentive to both resident comfort and morale.
Another clear pro is the optimistic trajectory communicated by the ownership, talk of building toward an A++ facility signals an active commitment to improvement. For families patient enough to allow for a maturation period, this suggests tangible gains in staffing stability, programming, and overall resident satisfaction over the next several months to a year. Such momentum matters when current outcomes appear uneven across reviews. The caution lies in the absence of a long‑standing, verifiable record; the promised upgrades require ongoing verification. Prospective residents should press for concrete timelines, measurable targets, and independent indicators of progress to ensure the optimism translates into consistent day‑to‑day quality.
Yet the risk profile cannot be ignored. The mix of reviews, two glowing, one middling, one very negative, illustrates that experiences may vary more than hoped. The explicit negative comparison to Golden Oaks is a reminder that some families will find stronger alignment elsewhere. Prospective residents must scrutinize staffing levels, turnover, and whether the facility offers the specific services needed, such as memory care or rehabilitation supports, before committing. The new leadership is a promising signal, but it does not eliminate the possibility of growing pains. A disciplined due‑diligence process, tours, direct conversations with caregivers, and a review of care plans, remains essential.
In practical terms, Mary Ann Manor offers a practical fit for families who want a small, personable environment backed by engaged new owners and a warm caregiving team. It suits those willing to engage in a careful, observation‑driven decision process and to invest time in verifying that promised improvements deliver consistent, everyday quality of life. If the priority is an established track record or a facility with a broad, immediately available service menu, exploring Golden Oaks or similar options may be prudent. Otherwise, schedule thorough visits, meet residents and staff, and compare concrete care metrics, Mary Ann Manor shows real promise, with the best chance of delivering a genuinely home‑like, caring experience when the new leadership’s plans fully take root.
14 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Pittsburgh International (20 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide