Rosehaven Retirement Inn

Pros

• The initial staff member who interacted with the reviewer was nice and friendly.
• There are good staff members at Rosehaven who genuinely care about the residents.
• The manager of the unit shows concern for the residents’ well-being.
• Some residents demonstrate a sense of community by helping recover stolen items.

Cons

• The staff were not very friendly and seemed unhelpful.
• The building is old and in poor condition.
• There was a lack of organization and professionalism among the staff.
• Residents experienced theft of personal belongings with little to no action taken by staff.
• There are concerns about the safety and security of residents' property.
• The overall environment felt uncomfortable and unwelcoming.
• The management appeared disinterested in resolving issues affecting residents.
• Understaffing led to inadequate support for residents' needs.

Review

The reviews of Rosehaven present a troubling picture of a facility that claims to offer supportive living but, in practice, appears to fall short on multiple fronts. The financial demands alone raise eyebrows, with a monthly fee of $1,000 coupled with an additional deposit of $250. For many individuals and families, these costs could prove prohibitive. However, the core issues seem to extend far beyond mere finances; they spiral into concerns about the overall atmosphere and management within the building.

Upon arrival at Rosehaven, one reviewer found the environment both uninviting and disheartening. The staff's demeanor left much to be desired—the initial interaction seemed polite enough; however, the transition to dealing with management revealed inefficiencies that were hard to overlook. The manager struggled to access necessary hospital records for admission, leading to visible frustration and suggesting a lack of organization and professionalism within the facility. This was compounded by her apparent distraction while eating and conversing on her cellphone rather than focusing on her responsibilities. Such behavior fosters doubt regarding the care standards at Rosehaven.

Further compounding these worries is the unsettling community dynamic within Rosehaven itself. The reviewer noted that many individuals residing there exhibited signs of severe mental distress or instability, contributing to a chaotic atmosphere that felt uncomfortable and unsafe. With comments detailing feelings of unease among residents and visitors alike, it becomes evident that some may find it difficult to feel secure in their surroundings. When confronted with such an environment, it’s understandable why someone would immediately decide against making this place their home.

However alarming these individual experiences may be, deeper concerns arise when examining security issues reported about thefts occurring within Rosehaven’s walls. One specific case stands out—a high school class ring belonging to a resident was stolen along with various personal items like clothes and electronics—including an expensive radio cassette player—without adequate response from staff or management. When residents are subjected to repeated losses without resolution or acknowledgment from those responsible for overseeing their safety, trust in the establishment undoubtedly wanes.

There seems to be broad recognition that while certain staff members genuinely care about resident welfare—demonstrating dedication amidst what is described as chronic understaffing—the overall response from administration leaves much room for improvement. Instances where stolen goods were returned only through efforts made by other residents highlight systemic deficiencies in maintaining both security measures and effective communication protocols between staff members and those relying on them for assistance.

In conclusion, despite having elements showcasing potential—such as caring personnel—the overarching impression gathered from these reviews paints Rosehaven as poorly managed with significant concerns regarding safety and community well-being persistently unaddressed. It stands as a cautionary tale for prospective residents who must weigh not only financial considerations but also evaluate whether they will find solace in such an environment—or if it might instead heighten their sense of vulnerability amid ongoing turmoil surrounding them.

Places of Worship

• Greater McIntyre Chapel (0.5 miles)
• Warren Chapel United Methodist Church (0.7 miles)
• Kindgdom Hall Of Jehovah's Witnesses (0.9 miles)
• Mt Hebron Baptist Church (1.1 miles)
• First United Methodist Church (1.2 miles)
• Pleasant Hill Baptist Church (1.2 miles)
• Centro De Amistad Tristiana (1.5 miles)

Restaurants

• Sonic Drive-In (1 miles)
• Taco Bell (1 miles)
• Hot Rodz Diner (1 miles)
• El Nogalito Restaurant (1 miles)
• Rio Lerma (1.1 miles)
• Braum's (1.1 miles)
• Whataburger (1.2 miles)

Cafes

• Shipley DO-Nut Shop (1 miles)
• Starbucks (2 miles)
• Daylight Donuts (9.3 miles)
• Starbucks (9.4 miles)

Physicians

• Chaim Banjo MD (1 miles)
• Terrell Urgent Care (1.1 miles)
• Regional Health Clinic (1.1 miles)
• Heartplace (1.3 miles)
• Family Medical Center (1.3 miles)
• ABA Medical Clinic (1.3 miles)
• Regional Orthopedic Center (1.6 miles)

Hospitals

• Renaissance Hospital Terrell (1.1 miles)
• Terrell State Hospital (1.9 miles)
• Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Kaufman (9.2 miles)

Transportation

• Enterprise Rent-A-Car (1.1 miles)
• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (8.3 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (1.3 miles)
• Medication Station (9.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (9.4 miles)
• Walgreens (9.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (9.5 miles)
• Kroger Pharmacy (9.5 miles)

Parks

• Kaufman City Park (8.6 miles)

Theaters

• AMC CLASSIC Forney 12 (9.3 miles)