1010 Rosehill Road, Terrell, TX 75160
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Rosehaven Retirement Inn Costs & Pricing
Rosehaven Retirement Inn offers a premium living experience for its residents, with a monthly cost of $8,246 for a private room. This rate reflects the enhanced services and amenities that the facility provides, creating a supportive and enriching environment tailored to the needs of seniors. In comparison, the average cost in Rockwall County stands at $3,387, while the state average for Texas is slightly higher at $4,096. The significant difference in pricing emphasizes Rosehaven's commitment to quality care and personalized attention, positioning it as a choice for those seeking an elevated standard of living in their retirement years.
| Floor plans | Rosehaven Retirement Inn | Rockwall County | Texas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $8,246 | $3,387 | $4,096 |
Overall Review of Rosehaven Retirement Inn
Pros
The manager cares about the residents.
There are good staff members at the facility.
The first staff member was nice.
Cons
The place was described as the worst place, with bed bugs and roaches.
The staff and management were unfriendly and unhelpful, not seeming to want to assist.
The building was old and poorly maintained.
There were frequent thefts among residents, with staff doing little to recover stolen items.
The rent and deposits were overpriced for what was offered.
Understaffing left residents without adequate care.
Overall, it was portrayed as a very unpleasant place that the reviewer would not consider living in.
Review
Rosehaven Retirement Inn in Terrell, TX is best suited for only a very narrow slice of seniors: those who can tolerate a high-risk environment, extremely limited oversight, and a price point that does not align with quality of care. The combination of an aging building, alleged staff missteps, and frequent behavioral and safety concerns makes it impractical for anyone who expects reliable safety, consistent service, or respectful treatment. For families evaluating options, this community is not a fit for residents who need close supervision, regular medication oversight, or a clean, well-maintained living space.
Alternatives should be considered by anyone whose priority is safety, integrity, and dependable staffing. Seniors who require help with daily activities but depend on a calm, well-managed setting should look elsewhere. Families seeking transparent operations, prompt handling of belongings, and clear lines of accountability will likely be disappointed here. Those with budget constraints may briefly wonder if the price is workable, but the documented issues, pest problems, theft, and inconsistent management, prove that cost savings come with unacceptable risk.
The few positives that emerge from the notes do not meaningfully offset the core downsides. A handful of staff members are described as caring, and one reviewer acknowledged that the manager appears to care about residents even if ownership may not. Still, these partial positives cannot compensate for pervasive problems: alleged criminal behavior by a manager leading to state scrutiny, recurring pest infestations, and a facility that feels understaffed and underprepared. The sense of safety and trust, pivotal for any care setting, is undermined by claims of theft, with family members reporting items disappearing and staff not taking action. In short, supportive hands on the floor do not translate into reliable, accountable care here.
The most troubling themes are concrete and actionable: a history of alleged administrative misconduct, an aging building that likely strains maintenance resources, and ongoing theft concerns that staff do not consistently curb. The admissions process appears disjointed, with records problems cited during initial contact. Guests report disorganization, uneven staff attention, and a climate where residentsā belongings are at risk. Bed bugs and roaches crop up in the feedback, painting a picture of cleanliness issues that undermine daily comfort and dignity. When a community cannot demonstrate solid pest control, preventative maintenance, and transparent operations, the fundamental promise of assisted living, safe, stable daily living, dissolves.
Families evaluating Rosehaven should deploy a rigorous due-diligence phase. First, demand a formal tour and probe for specific metrics: staff-to-resident ratios by shift, incident reports, and how theft is prevented and resolved. Request copies of licensing records, recent inspections, and any active investigations, and contact state authorities to verify status. Ask for policies on medication administration, resident belongings, and emergency response. Check references with current and former residents or families, and observe how staff interact with residents during a tour. If this community is one option, pair it with several solid alternatives nearby that offer modern amenities, robust activity programming, clearly defined care levels, and transparent governance.
Ultimately, Rosehaven Retirement Inn should be deprioritized in decision-making. For most seniors, the risk-reward balance does not favor this address. Families should gravitate toward facilities with proven safety records, proactive management, clean environments, and clear accountability mechanisms. If a move is still contemplated, it should be accompanied by stringent protections, a guaranteed trial period, and a concrete exit plan. The goal is to protect a loved one from the very issues that reviews repeatedly flag here, ensuring a living situation that supports dignity, safety, and dependable caregiving.










Assisted Living Support for Veterans: A Complete and Detailed Overview
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
8 Key Indicators That Suggest It May Be Time to Transition from Assisted Living to Skilled Nursing Care