Ledgestone Senior Living Costs & Pricing
Ledgestone Senior Living offers competitive pricing for its various room types, standing out favorably compared to both Travis County and broader Texas averages. For a studio, residents can expect to pay $2,650 monthly, significantly lower than the county average of $3,999 and the state average of $3,758. Similarly, the one-bedroom units at Ledgestone are priced at $3,065, which is again more economical than the county's $3,919 and Texas's $3,761. The two-bedroom option is available for $3,580 - still a more attractive deal when juxtaposed with the Travis County rate of $4,448 and Texas's average of $4,215. Notably, even in the semi-private accommodations priced at $4,915 per month, Ledgestone remains competitive against Travis County's rate of $4,300 while still sitting above the state average of $3,680. Overall, Ledgestone Senior Living provides a valuable choice for seniors seeking quality living arrangements without the higher financial burden typically found in the area.
| Floor plans | Ledgestone Senior Living | Travis County | Texas |
|---|
| Studio | $2,650 | $3,999 | $3,758 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,065 | $3,919 | $3,761 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,580 | $4,448 | $4,215 |
| Semi-Private | $4,915 | $4,300 | $3,680 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$264 / mo
Maravilla at the Domain
$2,914 / month
20.3 miles away
-
from +$350 / mo
The Crossing at Oak Hill Assisted Living and Memory Care
$3,000 to $4,495 / month
6.4 miles away
-
from -$105 / mo
Parmer Woods at North Austin
$2,545 to $5,845 / month
22.7 miles away
-
from -$128 / mo
Longhorn Village
$2,522 to $4,750 / month
11.0 miles away
-
from -$495 / mo
The Enclave at Cedar Park Senior Living
$2,155 to $3,960 / month
19.9 miles away
Overall Review of Ledgestone Senior Living
common
34 reviews mention this
Caring staff and supportive care
Residents and families frequently describe attentive, caring staff and support.
Many reviews emphasize that the staff treats residents with kindness and pays attention to individual needs. Families also describe help with transitions across care levels when needs change, including getting support promptly once supervision was needed. Several reviewers say the community feels responsive when they raise concerns, and they mention specific team members by name in their experiences.
common
26 reviews mention this
Dining quality and restaurant-style meals
Food is a frequent highlight, with residents describing restaurant-style dining.
A large number of reviews describe the meals as delicious, well planned, and better than what they expected for senior living. Several people mention dining room meals and a restaurant-style approach, and some also bring up specific meal perks like breakfast inclusion at the time of their review. At the same time, a smaller set of reviews report problems such as cold meals or declining food quality after management changes.
differentiator
2 reviews mention this
Value and pricing below benchmarks
Pricing is described as reasonable, with the community positioned well below benchmarks.
A couple of reviews describe the move as a financially sensible choice compared with other options they toured. In the listing, monthly ranges are also shown as below county and state benchmarks across unit types, which aligns with the “value” comments in those reviews.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Elevator outages disrupt daily life
Elevator malfunctions are a major recurring problem for residents.
Two reviews describe weeks-long elevator outages that left residents unable to reach areas of the building safely, especially for people who use walkers or wheelchairs. One reviewer describes residents being forced to make long trips to the working elevator in order to access the dining room and their apartments. Both reviews frame this as an urgent safety and accessibility issue that the community had not resolved quickly enough.
caveat
11 reviews mention this
Turnover, communication, and understaffing concerns
Multiple reviews raise concerns about staffing levels, communication, and consistency of care.
Several reviews describe periods of chaos after leadership changes, including high staff turnover and missed or inconsistent care expectations. Families also mention not getting timely responses, with some saying requests were ignored or needed frequent follow-ups. A few reviews connect these operational gaps to practical problems like delayed assistance, unaddressed work orders, or residents needing outside support.
common
18 reviews mention this
Clean, well-kept building and amenities
Many reviewers comment on cleanliness, upkeep, and overall facility presentation.
A number of reviews describe the community as clean, well maintained, and welcoming during tours and visits. Several reviewers also mention liked amenities such as a pool area and a library, and they describe spaces that feel organized and comfortable. There is at least one contrasting review citing a serious cleanliness concern, but the majority of experiences focus on the facility being kept up.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.