Adult Living At Rosebrook

Pros

• The staff are friendly and helpful.
• The food is delicious.
• There are fun and exciting activities every day.
• The facility is top-notch.
• It has a bus for resident outings.
• The staff were wonderful, helpful, and friendly.
• The experience was kind and caring.
• The staff accommodate calls and check-ins.
• The facility is neat and clean, with residents dressed and groomed well.
• Residents seem content and cared for.

Cons

• The facility was decorated in a cluttered, chaotic country crafts theme.
• The apartment shown for the reviewer's parents reeked of urine and had dubious stains on the carpet.
• There was inadequate staffing, with too many residents needing more care than could be safely provided, and the administration was described as solely focused on making a profit.
• The staff were described as very incompetent.
• The staff were described as awful, unprofessional, lazy and rude.
• The reviewer stated that their mother became ill for about two weeks, required an ambulance, was hospitalized for two weeks, did not recover, and died on April 25, 2019.

Review

The collection of experiences shared about Rosebrook paints a complex picture: a place that many families find warm, engaging, and genuinely caring, yet one that can also raise serious questions about upkeep, staffing, and the consistency of care. Across the different voices, there is a strong sense that this facility often feels like a welcoming home for residents, with attentive staff, enjoyable activities, and thoughtful touches that help both residents and visiting family members feel connected and supported.

Several reviewers describe Rosebrook as fantastic and highly recommend it. They speak of delicious food, friendly and helpful staff, and a schedule filled with everyday activities that keep residents engaged and entertained. One person notes the presence of a bus for outings, which adds an important dimension of independence and opportunity for residents to enjoy excursions beyond the building. The sentiment is that, for many, the environment is top-notch - something that families appreciate deeply when they are considering a long-term living arrangement for a loved one. In a personal account, someone who was in the facility for almost three months recalls the staff as wonderful, consistently helpful and friendly, to the extent that they still miss many of the team members after more than two years away from the facility. The appreciation is rooted not just in basic care, but in a sense of being valued and cared for during a difficult transition.

Another thread in the reviews highlights the emotional and logistical support families receive from Rosebrook. For relatives navigating the challenging transition from independence to assisted living, the facility appears to deliver on the promise of attentive care. Reviewers describe a consistently neat and clean environment during visits, with residents who are dressed and groomed well in common spaces. They also note that the staff they encounter - whether answering the phone or assisting with daily needs - are friendly and kind. Beyond routine care, Rosebrook seems to facilitate a broad array of connections: coordinating appointments with visiting physicians and nurses, arranging social work support, and managing deliveries. In these narratives, the care for the loved one is portrayed as comprehensive and organized, reducing the burden on anxious family members and giving them confidence that their relative's medical and social needs are being addressed.

However, the picture is not uniformly glowing. A tour account describes a different side of the experience, painting Rosebrook as cluttered and chaotic in decor, with a specific showing that included an apartment reeking of urine and stained carpet. This negative impression contrasts with the more positive, homey tone of other reviews and serves as a reminder that impressions can vary dramatically depending on timing, specific unit, or personal expectations of aesthetics and cleanliness. Another note from the same thread indicates that the resident in question was there for improvement of walking, with physical therapy twice a week and support from Concordia Visiting Nurses PT. This acknowledgment of ongoing therapy underscores that even within positive care experiences, there are genuine service elements - like therapy - that patients rely on, and their quality may be a key factor in perceived overall satisfaction.

Concerns about staffing and management surface in some of the critiques, suggesting a potential tension between the size of the resident community and the level of care that can be safely provided. One reviewer explicitly describes inadequate staffing and a perception that the administration prioritizes profit over patient needs. This kind of feedback highlights an important issue for families evaluating any facility: the ability to maintain appropriate ratios and deliver consistent, high-quality care, even as resident needs fluctuate. The same voice references a broader worry that the system's priorities may not always align with individual resident welfare, which can leave families feeling unsettled or uncertain about long-term outcomes.

There are also deeply troubling firsthand accounts of care failures. One reviewer recounts a distressing experience in which their mother became sick for about two weeks, and they had to suggest that an ambulance be called. The family member explains that the hospital stay lasted two weeks, and their mother did not recover, ultimately passing away in their home in a specific date in 2019. This narrative conveys a grave lapse in perceived care quality and responsiveness, prompting serious questions about how emergencies are handled, how quickly help is summoned, and how communications with families are managed during critical health events. Another reviewer uses stark language to describe the staff as awful - unprofessional, lazy, and rude - and expresses a sentiment that such behavior would make one reluctant to leave a parent there. Taken together, these accounts remind readers that experiences at Rosebrook can be highly variable and that some families have endured significant distress alongside their loved ones' care.

Despite these serious concerns, there is also a sense of cautious balance in the final observations. In multiple visits during a recent period, at least one reviewer notes that residents appear content and well cared for, with the facility clean and orderly and ample spaces for visiting with family and friends. This more positive snapshot suggests that, depending on when and where you are in the facility, the quality of care and the surrounding environment can differ. It implies that Rosebrook has the capacity to provide a supportive, socially engaging setting that many families value, while also indicating that maintenance, staffing levels, and the consistency of positive interactions can vary in meaningful ways.

Taken as a whole, the reviews convey a nuanced portrait of Rosebrook. For many families, the facility represents a beacon of warmth, community, and attentive care, where staff contributions matter deeply and everyday life can feel comfortable and connected for residents. Yet there are equally important concerns raised by others: cluttered or aging aesthetics in some spaces, odors or cleanliness issues in specific units, questions about staffing adequacy, and experiences where families felt let down by perceived delays, insufficient responsiveness, or miscommunication during health emergencies. The breadth of these perspectives underscores the importance of a careful, thorough evaluation when considering Rosebrook for a loved one. Prospective residents and their families should plan comprehensive site visits at various times, engage in frank conversations about staffing levels and emergency protocols, review current resident feedback and state inspections, and seek out multiple current residents' experiences to balance the positive warmth with the critical concerns expressed by others. In doing so, they can arrive at a well-informed judgment about whether Rosebrook aligns with their expectations for safety, comfort, and care.

Restaurants

• Burger King (0.1 miles)
• Rock-A-Fellas Sports Grille (0.2 miles)
• Evolution Grille (0.2 miles)
• Cellar Works Brewing (2.3 miles)
• Peter B's Bar & Grill (3.3 miles)
• Pizza Hut (3.9 miles)
• Saxon Inn (4.2 miles)

Physicians

• Children's Community Pediatrics - Armstrong, Sarver Office (0.3 miles)
• Sarver Family Practice (0.3 miles)
• Eye Care Center (2.3 miles)
• Allegheny Ophthalmology Associates (4.3 miles)
• Allegheny Associates In Psychiatry (4.6 miles)
• Kamenova, Boriana Dr - Upmc Cancer Center Natrona Heights (4.7 miles)
• UPMC Natrona Heights (4.7 miles)

Theaters

• South Pike Cinemas (0.3 miles)
• Cinemark (9.5 miles)

Hospitals

• Childrens Hospital (0.3 miles)
• Alle-Kiski Medical Center (5.7 miles)
• Schwalm Hall (6.2 miles)
• American Renal Associates (10.5 miles)

Parks

• Freeport Riverside Park (2.2 miles)
• Harrison Hills County Park (3.6 miles)
• Riverview Memorial Park (7 miles)
• Deer Lakes Park (7.8 miles)
• Kennedy Park (10.4 miles)
• Crooked Creek Lake Recreation Area (10.7 miles)
• Middlesex Twp Community Park (11 miles)

Places of Worship

• Pittsburgh Buddhist Center (2.3 miles)
• Cabot United Methodist Church (5.6 miles)
• Slate Lick United Presbyterian Church (6 miles)
• St Lawrence Parish Map (8.1 miles)
• St Lawrence Roman Catholic Church (8.1 miles)
• Mount Saint Peter Roman Catholic Church (9.6 miles)
• Christ Prince of Peace Church (10.8 miles)

Pharmacies

• Colonial Pharmacy (3.3 miles)
• Rite Aid (5.4 miles)
• Providence Pharmacy Services (6.1 miles)
• Health Mart Pharmacy (7.5 miles)
• Burrell Pharmacy (7.6 miles)
• Klingensmith's Drug Store (7.7 miles)
• Walgreens (7.8 miles)

Cafes

• Happy Day Cafe (7.6 miles)
• Starbucks (9.9 miles)
• Myrt's Route 66 Cafe (10.1 miles)

Transportation

• Scherder's Taxidermy (9 miles)
• Wolf's Wildlife Reflections (9.6 miles)