Logan Personal Care in Pittsburgh, PA

Pros

• The place is a spectacular place to further one's recovery.
• The managers are supportive and want to see residents do well and learn a new and better way to live.
• Residents appreciate Jared and Mike (the house managers) and Cheryl (the owner) for their guidance.
• The place is great and helps people.
• It is not run like a typical halfway house, offering a more balanced and supportive structure.

Cons

• The place is tiny and overpriced.
• Residents must attend 90 meetings in 90 days.
• The buses are really bad.
• They can't walk anywhere.
• The incline is always being serviced.
• This place is a nasty house.
• They have bed bugs for over six months.
• Rats are running around the back deck.
• There is no community room for the women who live downstairs.
• No cable, pathetic wifi, no house computer.
• It is filthy dirty.
• They care little about recovery as long as rent is paid.
• The women are constantly being threatened with eviction by Johnny.

Review

Logan Personal Care in Pittsburgh is best suited for residents who want a tightly regulated, recovery-oriented living environment where accountability and active staff support are central. The strongest fit appears to be individuals who welcome concrete structure: a homegroup, a sponsor, and the expectation to attend meetings regularly while maintaining sobriety. For those who value a clear path and hands-on guidance from managers, this community can feel like a clear, purposeful place to grow. It is not positioned as a luxury or as a loosely supervised living option; rather, it operates with a defined framework that emphasizes recovery progress over comfort.

That said, serious consideration should be given to alternatives for anyone who cannot tolerate risky conditions or a harsher environment. Reports raise significant red flags about cleanliness, safety, and quality of life: bed bugs for months, rats on the back deck, and no meaningful communal space for residents downstairs. Communication channels and amenities also appear limited, with references to unreliable wifi, no cable, and an absence of basic on-site resources. When paired with concerns about eviction pressure and a perceived lack of resident support beyond rent collection, the case for looking elsewhere becomes compelling. Add in transportation drawbacks - tiny, overpriced accommodations with buses that perform poorly and limited walkability - and the fit becomes even more restricted for those needing real accessibility and comfort.

The most persuasive positives center on the staff and the recovery framework. Positive testimonials highlight the house managers - who are described as supportive and genuinely invested in residents' success - and an owner who is involved in the program. Unlike some halfway houses, this setting is portrayed as structured rather than laissez-faire, with explicit expectations around homegroup participation, sponsorship, and ongoing meetings. For residents who thrive under accountable leadership and a clear, purpose-driven routine, these elements can translate into meaningful momentum toward independence and a new life. The non-curfew stance, paired with visible accountability, is cited by some as a practical balance between freedom and responsibility.

Conversely, the cons present a sustained, real-world challenge to day-to-day quality of life. Pest and sanitation problems undermine health and dignity; the absence of a welcoming communal area and reliable amenities can erode morale and social connection. The financial bar - described as tiny and overpriced - frames the decision as not only about recovery, but also about value and long-term affordability. Structural instability mentioned in at least one review - the facility reportedly being in a closing phase - adds risk that can interrupt progress or force a disruptive move at an unpredictable time. When these factors collide with the recovery-centered benefits, the result is a mixed picture that will ring differently depending on individual priorities.

Ultimately, the key question is whether the recovery discipline and active oversight justify the trade-offs in living standards and cost. For residents who place the highest premium on a firm, supportive recovery track and can endure (or overlook) pest issues and limited amenities, Logan may deliver tangible benefit. For those who prioritize safety, cleanliness, consistent facilities, accessible transportation, and predictable stability, alternatives should be pursued with urgency. The decision should hinge on current conditions and a candid visit: verify cleanliness and pest control status, assess the truth behind the "place is closing" note, confirm transportation options, and review the lease for eviction terms and dispute resolution. In short, Logan Personal Care can be a strong fit for a niche segment of recovery-driven residents - just not for everyone.

This part of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania offers a convenient and accessible location for senior living. With a variety of pharmacies, restaurants, cafes, places of worship, parks, physicians, hospitals, and transportation options nearby, residents have easy access to essential services and amenities. The area features well-known chain pharmacies like CVS and Rite Aid for medication needs, as well as popular dining options such as McDonald's and Panera Bread for meals. Places of worship are also close by for spiritual fulfillment. In addition, there are several parks for outdoor recreation and relaxation. For healthcare needs, reputable medical facilities such as St. Clair Hospital and UPMC Mercy are located within a few miles. Transportation is efficient with multiple bus stops and the Amtrak station nearby for easy travel around the city. Overall, this neighborhood provides convenience and accessibility for seniors looking to live in a bustling yet comfortable area of Pittsburgh.

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.9 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.7 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.8 miles)
• Shop 'n Save (1.8 miles)
• Rite Aid (2.5 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.4 miles)
• Scoops On Beverly (1.6 miles)
• Hitchhiker Brewing (1.6 miles)
• McDonald's (1.9 miles)
• McDonald's (2 miles)
• Wendy's (2.1 miles)
• Taco Bell (2.2 miles)

Cafes

• Mediterra Cafe (1.5 miles)
• Panera Bread (2.4 miles)
• Bistro Marketplace (2.5 miles)
• Panera Bread (3.1 miles)
• Creative Coffee and Supply (3.2 miles)
• Carnegie Coffee Company (3.5 miles)
• Big Dog Coffee (3.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• Kingdom Hall Of Jehovahs Witnesses (2.1 miles)
• St Simon & Jude Church (2.2 miles)
• St Margaret of Scotland Roman Catholic Church (2.3 miles)
• St Elizabeth Ann Seton Church (3.7 miles)
• St Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish (3.7 miles)
• St Philip Church (3.8 miles)

Parks

• Mt. Lebanon Park (2.2 miles)
• Mt Washington Observation Deck (2.7 miles)
• The Duquesne Incline (3.1 miles)
• Point State Park Fountain (3.3 miles)
• Point State Park (3.4 miles)
• Village Green Park (3.5 miles)

Physicians

• Chang Eye Group (2.5 miles)
• St. Clair Hospital (2.7 miles)
• Vujevich Dermatology Associates (2.8 miles)
• Upmc (3.3 miles)
• Allergy & Asthma Associates (3.4 miles)
• Allegheny Cancer Center (4.4 miles)
• Kaufmann Medical Building (4.5 miles)

Hospitals

• UPMC Mercy (3.4 miles)
• UPMC South Hills (3.9 miles)
• Magee-Women's Hospital of UPMC (4.3 miles)
• Allegheny General Hospital (4.4 miles)
• Sleep Laboratory at UPMC Montefiore (4.4 miles)
• University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (4.6 miles)

Transportation

• Port Authority Allegheny Station (3.6 miles)
• North Side Station (3.7 miles)
• Bus Station (3.7 miles)
• Amtrak - Pittsburgh Station (3.7 miles)
• South Hills Village Trolley Stop (4.1 miles)