623 Brookline Blvd, Pittsburgh, PA 15226
To contact a resident: (412) 571-1428
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Logan Personal Care Costs & Pricing
Logan Personal Care offers remarkably competitive pricing for its services compared to the surrounding region and state averages. For a semi-private room, the cost at Logan is $1,200 per month, significantly lower than the average of $3,166 in Allegheny County and $3,542 across Pennsylvania. Similarly, the private room option at Logan is priced at $1,500 - again well below both Allegheny County's average of $3,905 and Pennsylvania's average of $4,890. These cost-effective rates make Logan Personal Care an attractive choice for families seeking quality care without the hefty financial burden often associated with similar facilities.
| Floor plans | Logan Personal Care | Allegheny County | Pennsylvania |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,200 | $3,166 | $3,542 |
| Private | $1,500 | $3,905 | $4,890 |
Overall Review of Logan Personal Care
Pros
The place is a spectacular place to further one’s recovery.- The managers are supportive and want to see residents do well and learn a new and better way to live.
- Residents appreciate Jared and Mike (the house managers) and Cheryl (the owner) for their guidance.
- The place is great and helps people.
- It is not run like a typical halfway house, offering a more balanced and supportive structure.
Cons
The place is tiny and overpriced.- Residents must attend 90 meetings in 90 days.
- The buses are really bad.
- They can’t walk anywhere.
- The incline is always being serviced.
- This place is a nasty house.
- They have bed bugs for over six months.
- Rats are running around the back deck.
- There is no community room for the women who live downstairs.
- No cable, pathetic wifi, no house computer.
- It is filthy dirty.
- They care little about recovery as long as rent is paid.
- The women are constantly being threatened with eviction by Johnny.
Review
Logan Personal Care in Pittsburgh is best suited for residents who want a tightly regulated, recovery-oriented living environment where accountability and active staff support are central. The strongest fit appears to be individuals who welcome concrete structure: a homegroup, a sponsor, and the expectation to attend meetings regularly while maintaining sobriety. For those who value a clear path and hands-on guidance from managers, this community can feel like a clear, purposeful place to grow. It is not positioned as a luxury or as a loosely supervised living option; rather, it operates with a defined framework that emphasizes recovery progress over comfort.
That said, serious consideration should be given to alternatives for anyone who cannot tolerate risky conditions or a harsher environment. Reports raise significant red flags about cleanliness, safety, and quality of life: bed bugs for months, rats on the back deck, and no meaningful communal space for residents downstairs. Communication channels and amenities also appear limited, with references to unreliable wifi, no cable, and an absence of basic on-site resources. When paired with concerns about eviction pressure and a perceived lack of resident support beyond rent collection, the case for looking elsewhere becomes compelling. Add in transportation drawbacks, tiny, overpriced accommodations with buses that perform poorly and limited walkability, and the fit becomes even more restricted for those needing real accessibility and comfort.
The most persuasive positives center on the staff and the recovery framework. Positive testimonials highlight the house managers, who are described as supportive and genuinely invested in residents’ success, and an owner who is involved in the program. Unlike some halfway houses, this setting is portrayed as structured rather than laissez-faire, with explicit expectations around homegroup participation, sponsorship, and ongoing meetings. For residents who thrive under accountable leadership and a clear, purpose-driven routine, these elements can translate into meaningful momentum toward independence and a new life. The non-curfew stance, paired with visible accountability, is cited by some as a practical balance between freedom and responsibility.
Conversely, the cons present a sustained, real-world challenge to day-to-day quality of life. Pest and sanitation problems undermine health and dignity; the absence of a welcoming communal area and reliable amenities can erode morale and social connection. The financial bar, described as tiny and overpriced, frames the decision as not only about recovery, but also about value and long-term affordability. Structural instability mentioned in at least one review, the facility reportedly being in a closing phase, adds risk that can interrupt progress or force a disruptive move at an unpredictable time. When these factors collide with the recovery-centered benefits, the result is a mixed picture that will ring differently depending on individual priorities.
Ultimately, the key question is whether the recovery discipline and active oversight justify the trade-offs in living standards and cost. For residents who place the highest premium on a firm, supportive recovery track and can endure (or overlook) pest issues and limited amenities, Logan may deliver tangible benefit. For those who prioritize safety, cleanliness, consistent facilities, accessible transportation, and predictable stability, alternatives should be pursued with urgency. The decision should hinge on current conditions and a candid visit: verify cleanliness and pest control status, assess the truth behind the “place is closing” note, confirm transportation options, and review the lease for eviction terms and dispute resolution. In short, Logan Personal Care can be a strong fit for a niche segment of recovery-driven residents, just not for everyone.
Board and Care Home
Private
Pittsburgh International (13 miles away)
Diabetic care
A Closer Look at Private Pay Home Care
Comprehensive Approaches for Arthritis: A Detailed Guide to Symptoms, Causes, and Care
Comprehensive Insights and Practical Strategies to Help Older Adults Avoid Falls