Logan Personal Care

Pros

• The place is described as a spectacular place to further one's recovery.
• The managers are described as supportive and wanting to see residents do well and learn a new and better way to live.
• Jared and Mike (the house managers) and Cheryl (the owner) are thanked for their help.
• It is called a great place that helps people.
• The place is considered a good place.

Cons

• The place is filthy and dirty, with bed bugs present for over six months.
• Rats are running around the back deck.
• There is no community room for the women who live downstairs.
• There is no cable, wifi is pathetic, and there is no house computer.
• The staff seem to care more about rent than about recovery.
• Women are constantly threatened with eviction for arbitrary reasons.
• The place is closing.
• It is tiny and overpriced, with a harsh 90-meetings-in-90-days requirement.
• Transportation is terrible: buses are unreliable, walking to places is not feasible, and the incline is always being serviced.

Review

People who have passed through this sober-living scene describe a place that sparks strong and mixed reactions. For some, it feels like a lifeline that provides structure and accountability; for others, it feels more like a cramped, demanding environment that tests patience, dignity, and even health. The most persistent threads in the testimonials revolve around a demanding schedule, a rigid sense of rules, and a stark contrast between the ideal of recovery and the reality on the ground. One of the most talked-about features is the requirement to attend a very intensive schedule: 90 meetings in 90 days. The idea behind it is clear - a push toward steady recovery - but the practical weight of that rule is a frequent focal point of the discussions, and it is often cited alongside concerns about accessibility and transportation.

On the negative side, the reviews paint a picture of serious living conditions that some residents could not endure. Filth and pests repeatedly surface as major problems - bed bugs allegedly present for months, and rats are described as roaming around the back deck. The living space itself is described as cramped and uncomfortable, with a sense that amenities one would expect in a comfortable home are missing or subpar. The downstairs women's area is singled out as lacking a community room, which many feel denies residents a safe, private space to support one another or host groups. The critique extends to basic comforts: there is no cable, the wifi is described as pathetic, and there is no house computer, leaving residents without reliable digital resources or entertainment. Overall cleanliness and upkeep are flagged as filthy, which compounds the sense of an environment that is not conducive to healing for some.

Beyond physical conditions, several reviews focus on the culture and management style. A recurring worry is that recovery is treated more as a financial transaction than a holistic service. One reviewer explicitly says the staff "could care less about recovery as long as you have your rent check," implying that stability in rent takes precedence over genuine supportive care. There are also intense interpersonal dynamics described, including threats of eviction toward women by someone named Johnny for arbitrary reasons. Those who mention Johnny convey fear and a sense that security within the home is precarious, which profoundly colors the overall perception of safety and trust in the house. These elements contribute to a climate in which some residents feel unsafe or undervalued, complicating any effort at genuine personal growth.

In the midst of these hard critiques, there is also a note that the place is closing. The implication is that the facility may not be around forever, which adds another layer of uncertainty for current residents and alumni who are trying to map out their recovery journeys. The sense of impermanence underscores the tension described by many: the same institution that offers structure and opportunities for accountability can also feel unstable and transient, leaving people to navigate the consequences without the steady support of a long-term home.

Yet the narrative is not uniformly negative. There is a contrasting voice that offers a completely different experience: the place can be spectacular for recovery when run with genuine care and clear boundaries. In this view, the house is not simply a rigid halfway house with sign-in sheets and strict curfews; instead, it emphasizes meaningful engagement and personal responsibility. The managers named, Jared and Mike, are repeatedly thanked for their supportive approach, and a resident who spent a year there credits the environment with helping them learn a new, sustainable way to live. The owner, Cheryl, is acknowledged as a key figure behind the scenes. The emphasis here is on sober living as a structured program where having a homegroup, a sponsor, regular meeting attendance, and a commitment not to use are essential. For people who buy into this framework, the transition out of the house can be a prepared, hopeful next step rather than an abrupt cut-off from recovery supports.

A few passages echo this more hopeful frame in briefer but still meaningful ways. Phrases like "Great place!! And they help people!!!" and "Good place" appear as quick endorsements, suggesting that for some individuals, the combination of accountability, community, and supportive staff creates a genuinely positive impact. Taken with the more critical reports, these positive snippets paint a picture of a program with real strengths - clear expectations, a network of relationships built on meetings and sponsorship, and staff who are credited with offering encouragement and guidance.

Putting the pieces together, the overall portrait is one of high complexity. The facility is described as a place that can offer strong structure, accountability, and meaningful recovery-oriented practices when it is functioning with purpose and care. At the same time, it is also depicted as a site where physical conditions, pest problems, limited resources, and a culture that some residents perceive as rent-driven or punitive can undermine the healing process for others. The divergence in experiences suggests that outcomes may hinge on individual needs, personal circumstances, and the particular moment in which a person enters the program. For someone considering this house, the decision seems to rest on weighing the value of intense structure, community accountability, and steady staff support against concerns about living conditions, safety, and the possibility of disruption by changes in management or program status.

This part of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania offers a convenient and accessible location for senior living. With a variety of pharmacies, restaurants, cafes, places of worship, parks, physicians, hospitals, and transportation options nearby, residents have easy access to essential services and amenities. The area features well-known chain pharmacies like CVS and Rite Aid for medication needs, as well as popular dining options such as McDonald's and Panera Bread for meals. Places of worship are also close by for spiritual fulfillment. In addition, there are several parks for outdoor recreation and relaxation. For healthcare needs, reputable medical facilities such as St. Clair Hospital and UPMC Mercy are located within a few miles. Transportation is efficient with multiple bus stops and the Amtrak station nearby for easy travel around the city. Overall, this neighborhood provides convenience and accessibility for seniors looking to live in a bustling yet comfortable area of Pittsburgh.

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.9 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.7 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.8 miles)
• Shop 'n Save (1.8 miles)
• Rite Aid (2.5 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.4 miles)
• Scoops On Beverly (1.6 miles)
• Hitchhiker Brewing (1.6 miles)
• McDonald's (1.9 miles)
• McDonald's (2 miles)
• Wendy's (2.1 miles)
• Taco Bell (2.2 miles)

Cafes

• Mediterra Cafe (1.5 miles)
• Panera Bread (2.4 miles)
• Bistro Marketplace (2.5 miles)
• Panera Bread (3.1 miles)
• Creative Coffee and Supply (3.2 miles)
• Carnegie Coffee Company (3.5 miles)
• Big Dog Coffee (3.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• Kingdom Hall Of Jehovahs Witnesses (2.1 miles)
• St Simon & Jude Church (2.2 miles)
• St Margaret of Scotland Roman Catholic Church (2.3 miles)
• St Elizabeth Ann Seton Church (3.7 miles)
• St Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish (3.7 miles)
• St Philip Church (3.8 miles)

Parks

• Mt. Lebanon Park (2.2 miles)
• Mt Washington Observation Deck (2.7 miles)
• The Duquesne Incline (3.1 miles)
• Point State Park Fountain (3.3 miles)
• Point State Park (3.4 miles)
• Village Green Park (3.5 miles)

Physicians

• Chang Eye Group (2.5 miles)
• St. Clair Hospital (2.7 miles)
• Vujevich Dermatology Associates (2.8 miles)
• Upmc (3.3 miles)
• Allergy & Asthma Associates (3.4 miles)
• Allegheny Cancer Center (4.4 miles)
• Kaufmann Medical Building (4.5 miles)

Hospitals

• UPMC Mercy (3.4 miles)
• UPMC South Hills (3.9 miles)
• Magee-Women's Hospital of UPMC (4.3 miles)
• Allegheny General Hospital (4.4 miles)
• Sleep Laboratory at UPMC Montefiore (4.4 miles)
• University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (4.6 miles)

Transportation

• Port Authority Allegheny Station (3.6 miles)
• North Side Station (3.7 miles)
• Bus Station (3.7 miles)
• Amtrak - Pittsburgh Station (3.7 miles)
• South Hills Village Trolley Stop (4.1 miles)