Paul's Run Costs & Pricing
At Paul's Run, the monthly costs for various room types present a competitive option when compared to both Philadelphia County and the broader state of Pennsylvania. For instance, the price for a studio at Paul's Run is $2,601, notably lower than the county average of $2,752 and significantly less than the statewide average of $3,737. Similarly, while a one-bedroom unit at Paul's Run costs $3,162, it remains within reach compared to Philadelphia County's $2,848 but still falls short of Pennsylvania's higher average of $4,006. The two-bedroom arrangement at Paul's Run priced at $4,115 is also attractive in this context; although it exceeds the county rate of $3,874 slightly, it is more affordable than the state average of $4,242. However, the semi-private option stands out as an exception with its cost of $5,340 being steeper than both local and state benchmarks - $3,662 and $3,542 respectively. Overall, Paul's Run emerges as a compelling choice for those seeking quality accommodations without straying too far above average regional pricing.
| Floor plans | Paul's Run | Philadelphia County | Pennsylvania |
|---|
| Studio | $2,601 | $2,752 | $3,737 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,162 | $2,848 | $4,006 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,115 | $3,874 | $4,242 |
| Semi-Private | $5,340 | $3,662 | $3,542 |
Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$369 / mo
Brandywine Living At Haverford Estates
$2,970 to $7,020 / month
15.7 miles away
-
from +$499 / mo
Cardinal Village
$3,100 to $4,925 / month
24.9 miles away
-
from +$201 / mo
Masonic Village at Burlington
$2,802 to $9,450 / month
11.1 miles away
-
from +$499 / mo
The Pines At Philadelphia Rehab And Healthcare Center
$3,100 / month
2.3 miles away
-
from +$499 / mo
The Terrace at Chestnut Hill
$3,100 to $3,364 / month
8.8 miles away
Overall Review of Paul's Run
common
18 reviews mention this
Clean, well-kept facility stands out
Residents and families repeatedly mention the facility is very clean and well maintained.
Multiple reviews describe the building as clean, spotless, and well-kept, with families noting no unpleasant odors and attentive upkeep. A few reviews also mention specific areas feeling maintained and pleasant. One review does raise a contrary point about a bad odor, but itâs an exception compared with the broader feedback.
common
20 reviews mention this
Friendly, responsive staff support residents
Staff are commonly described as friendly, helpful, and responsive to questions or concerns.
Residents and families frequently say the staff is accommodating, professional, and kind, including during meals and day-to-day interactions. Several reviewers highlight responsivenessâgoing out of the way to help, returning calls, or guiding families through steps. There are also a small number of negative staff experiences, including communication breakdowns and rudeness, but the dominant theme is that staff engagement matters to families.
common
16 reviews mention this
Activities and programs keep people involved
Activities and scheduled programming are a consistent part of the day people value.
Many reviews mention a steady rhythm of activities such as bingo, mah-jongg, exercise classes, movies, and organized events. Families also describe day trips and faith-based offerings as part of what helps residents meet others and stay engaged. A few reviews criticize limited activities or boredom for a specific resident, but overall programming appears to be a frequent reason people recommend the community.
common
13 reviews mention this
Dining experience is usually a plus
Meals are often described as enjoyable and accommodating to different needs.
Several residents and families speak positively about the food, describing it as excellent or enjoyable and noting that choices can be accommodated. Others mention a restaurant-style dining setup and the convenience of meals provided. While one reviewer says their loved one dislikes the food, multiple accounts suggest dining is an area the community puts effort into.
differentiator
10 reviews mention this
Care continuity is a strong fit
Residents and families often value the communityâs ability to move between care levels.
Many reviews describe using multiple stages of careâsuch as rehab transitioning toward assisted living or skilled nursingâwhile staying within the same overall community. Families also mention nursing check-ins and coordinated follow-through, including scheduling medical appointments after concerns were raised. Still, there are complaints tied to transitions and unmet expectations, so the fit seems to depend on individual circumstances and care needs.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Rehab and transitions can disappoint
A recurring concern involves rehab performance and communication during transitions.
Some reviews criticize rehab outcomes and attentionâdescribing inconsistent therapy follow-through, delays, or residents feeling ignored. A few families also describe transitions changing unexpectedly after initial indications, leaving them to manage care elsewhere. While other reviews report excellent rehab and coordination, the negative experiences are significant enough to stand out.
caveat
7 reviews mention this
Cost is a frequent tradeoff
Price is a common concern, even among people who otherwise recommend the community.
Several reviews explicitly frame the community as expensive and compare it to what families can afford. One review also mentions affordability pressure alongside the move to different care levels. Pricing is generally presented as higher than external benchmarks across unit types, which helps explain why cost comes up even in positive feedback.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.