3560 South East 79th, Portland, OR 97206
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of St. Anthony Village
Pros
The staff at St. Anthonyâs Village is amazing, and the food is seriously goodâespecially the homemade soup and bread.
Claudia is super helpful and guides visitors through tours and the moving process, making everything easier.
St. Anthonyâs Village is highly recommended.
Justin, the Med Tech, is amazing and very conscientious in supporting residents.
The ambience and staff are superb, making loved onesâ last years meaningful and enjoyable.
A 100-year-old mom is getting the best care here.
The staff are awesome, and Father Pat is wonderful.
Cons
The reviewer states that residents calling the nursesâ station do not receive timely help, risking their lives, and labels it neglect and even murder.
They describe the staff as lazy and negligent for failing to respond to emergencies.
The reviewer says the neglect will be reported to OSHA.
Review
St. Anthony Village in Portland is best suited for families seeking a continuing care residence where warmth, attentiveness, and daily life with a sense of home define the experience. The community shines for seniors who require on-site caregiving as needs evolve but still want meaningful independence, predictable routines, and a supportive team that feels connected to residentsâ lives. Several families describe a homey atmosphere combined with competent care, where transitions into the residence are smoothed by proactive staff like Claudia during tours and moving process, and where the overall tone leans toward dignity, companionship, and ongoing purpose.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families prioritizing the most immediate, fail-safe nurse- or emergency-response. The most serious red flag in the reviews centers on reported delays in responding to calls from residents in distress, with some accounts depicting frightening moments when help did not arrive promptly. For relatives whose loved ones live with conditions requiring near-perfect, always-on call coverage, or for families who want a facility with a more consistently aggressive emergency-safety culture, itâs prudent to compare other communities. Another consideration is the desire for a more modernized setting or different care model beyond a continuing care framework.
The strongest positives here offset concerns in practical, compelling ways. The caregiving team receives frequent praise for responsiveness, empathy, and careful handling of challenging behaviors, with a standout example being a Med Tech who is described as amazing and highly conscientious in navigating difficult situations. The staff generally earns confidence through personal connections, and the tour and onboarding assistance are cited as exceptionally helpful. Food is a notable bright spot, the daily homemade soup and bread frequently evoke home cooking and emotional reassurance for families. The ambience and overall atmosphere are described as superb, reinforcing a sense that residents can enjoy meaningful days, not merely endure care. In particular, several families highlight how care has restored independence, dignity, and peace of mind during difficult health episodes, including significant recovery or stabilization after surgeries, which speaks to a genuine continuum of care.
Yet the main drawbacks cannot be ignored. While many reviews celebrate supportive, affectionate interactions and high-quality daily life, at least one strongly negative account raises questions about emergency responsiveness and safety. The fear expressed is not merely about inconveniences but about life-or-death moments where help did not arrive promptly. This juxtaposition, exceptional warmth and competence in daily caregiving alongside serious concerns about crisis response, creates a real tension for families weighing this option. It is essential to acknowledge that experiences may vary by shift, unit, and individual staff, but the existence of such reports requires careful due diligence and verifiable commitments from leadership.
From a decision-making standpoint, the pros, the caring, attentive staff; the genuine acts of kindness from team members; the excellent food; the homey ambience; and the ability to provide ongoing care within a single community, offer substantial value for families who can tolerate the possibility of inconsistent emergency response and still feel reassured by a strong, person-centered culture. The key is to verify current staffing patterns, call-response metrics, and the facilityâs process for addressing complaints. Families should request recent response-time data, tour at varied hours, and conversations with multiple residentsâ families to gauge consistency. If fast, reliable medical responsiveness is non-negotiable, it is prudent to compare alternatives with a sharper safety record before committing.
In the end, St. Anthony Village stands as a thoughtfully arranged option for those who prize warmth, dignity, and a continuum of care in a community that feels like home. It is well suited for seniors whose families value a strong caregiving team, flavorful, home-cooked meals, and a living environment that supports independence within a supportive framework. However, for families where every urgent call must be answered within moments, or where a consistently brisk crisis-response culture is non-negotiable, exploring other Continuing Care Residences with demonstrably swifter emergency protocols is a prudent step. The decision should rest on concrete, current assurances about call-response performance and a clear plan for maintaining safety alongside the evident, well-loved strengths of daily life at St. Anthony Village.



















When Dementia Sparks Anger and Aggression: Understanding the Connection and Ways to Cope
Dementia Behaviors: In-Depth Understanding and Effective Coping Strategies
5 Early Indicators of Dementia and What You Can Do