Farmington Square Beaverton Costs & Pricing
Farmington Square Beaverton offers competitive pricing for its various room types when compared to the overall costs in Washington County and the state of Oregon. For a studio, residents can expect to pay $3,850 per month, slightly below the county's average of $3,909 and just above the state average of $3,815. In the one-bedroom category, however, Farmington Square is positioned at $4,420, which is higher than both county and state averages of $4,082 and $3,904 respectively. The semi-private option is listed at $4,760; here again, it exceeds both local and statewide costs - $4,848 in Washington County and $4,457 across Oregon. Overall, while some options are competitively priced or above average, they reflect the quality of care and services provided at Farmington Square Beaverton.
| Floor plans | Farmington Square Beaverton | Washington County | Oregon |
|---|
| Studio | $3,850 | $3,909 | $3,815 |
| 1 Bedroom | $4,420 | $4,082 | $3,904 |
| Semi-Private | $4,760 | $4,848 | $4,457 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$350 / mo
American Living Adult Family Home LLC
$3,500 / month
19.9 miles away
-
from -$350 / mo
Northwest Home Health
$3,500 to $3,700 / month
10.7 miles away
-
from +$150 / mo
The Finest Care AFH, LLC
$4,000 to $5,500 / month
18.4 miles away
-
from -$350 / mo
Grace Care Adult Foster Home
$3,500 / month
20.4 miles away
-
from -$350 / mo
Blue Sky Adult Care Home
$3,500 / month
3.9 miles away
Overall Review of Farmington Square Beaverton
common
86 reviews mention this
Caring, responsive staff stand out
Residents and families consistently describe staff who are kind, patient, and attentive.
Across many reviews, people emphasize day-to-day kindness and responsivenessâchecking in, helping with concerns, and keeping residents comfortable. Several describe communication and follow-through as a strength, including keeping family informed when something changed and coordinating care needs. In memory care specifically, reviewers also mention staff supporting patients with patience and redirection rather than frustration.
common
18 reviews mention this
Cleanliness and facility upkeep
Multiple reviewers mention the community feels clean, tidy, and well maintained.
Many reviews explicitly call out cleanlinessâclean rooms, a clean facility overall, and attention to keeping things sanitary. A few reviewers also contrast the place with other facilities by describing fewer lingering odor or cleanliness concerns. There are also a small number of mixed reviews that mention the building felt dated or not as well-kept, so cleanliness satisfaction isnât universal.
common
22 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Reviews repeatedly highlight activities that keep residents busy throughout the day.
Residents and families describe plenty to do, including bingo, chair exercises, music, and other scheduled activities. Several also mention outings and musicians or concerts, and a few describe how engagement helped with boredom or daily routine. Some reviews note reduced activity during COVID or specific preferences, but overall the activity calendar comes through strongly in the feedback.
common
14 reviews mention this
Food is often a bright spot
Dining quality comes up often, with many reviewers saying the food is enjoyable.
A number of reviews mention residents liking the meals, with specific comments about snacks and variety. Others describe the kitchen staff and day-to-day meal service as positive, including accommodating dietary preferences like vegetarian needs. A few reviews are less enthusiasticâsome say the food could be betterâso dining satisfaction varies, but the overall signal is favorable.
differentiator
17 reviews mention this
Care coordination for memory needs
Memory care transitions and dementia support are repeatedly described as thoughtful and steady.
Several reviews specifically discuss dementia care, including moving from transitional memory care to full memory care and how the change was handled. Families mention ongoing support as conditions progressed, including patience during challenging behaviors and communication about health or behavior changes. A few reviews mention hospice coordination as well, describing care teamwork when residents were under hospice support.
caveat
8 reviews mention this
Communication and billing concerns
Some reviews describe problems with communication, follow-through, or billing after move-in.
Alongside many positive experiences, a smaller set of reviews raises issues such as difficulty getting responses, delays or gaps in follow-through, and billing mistakes that were difficult to resolve. There are also mentions of concerns during medication and call-button responsiveness, plus complaints about management returning calls. These negative experiences are specific and recurring enough that they stand out as a caveat for prospective families.
caveat
5 reviews mention this
Pricing feels mixed versus expectations
Reviewers give mixed signals on value and pricing expectations.
A few reviews mention the cost as being high or not aligning with what was expected, including comments about needing more for the price. Others say it felt reasonable compared with alternatives or that pricing was in line with other local providers. The communityâs pricing ranges can also be viewed alongside the stated price positioning versus county and state averages.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.