856 Claude Scott Road, Warsaw, NC 28398
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Parish Family Care Home
Pros
The administrator was a huge help; he was very responsive and attentive.- It is a good place to work.
- The facility has sweet, caring nurses who love their patients.
- It is a nice place.
- The administrator's help reassures families that their loved ones are in a well-handled facility.
Cons
The reviewer notes it was impossible to communicate with loved ones.- The reviewer alleges the facility is the worst ever and that Eddie refuses proper rehab to push for payment.
- The staff are rude, inconsiderate, and nasty from the admin to the business manager.
- The place is filthy and smells of urine and feces throughout.
- The director never called to express sympathy after a loved one died, and staff are unprofessional.
- The public restrooms are gross, the facility is old and needs updating, and the medicine cart was left unattended in the hallway.
- The review gives 0 stars and suggests avoiding the place.
- The facility is described as a joke.
Review
Parish Family Care Home in Warsaw, NC is best suited for families operating on a tight budget who value a small, home-like setting and are prepared to take an active, hands-on role in overseeing care. The community may work for relatively independent seniors who need basic daily assistance and some light rehabilitation, provided a family member can regularly check in, coordinate with staff, and advocate when concerns arise. It is not aimed at those seeking a polished, hospital-grade environment or highly structured clinical rehab programs; in short, affordability and a homier atmosphere are the strongest draws for this option.
At the same time, this facility demands caution for families with higher expectations around rehabilitation rigor, transparent communication, and stable leadership. A number of reviews underscore Medicaid-driven constraints and turnover in administration, which translate into inconsistent accountability and variable responsiveness. For residents who require predictable rehab protocols, consistent family-style communication, or a consistently present senior leadership team, alternatives should be seriously considered rather than assuming reliability will improve with time.
On the positive side, there are glimpses of strength that can matter in day-to-day care. Several reviewers note caring nurses and moments when the administrator or certain staff were helpful and responsive. A few callouts describe the facility as well-handled or the administrator as attentive in specific interactions. These snapshots suggest that when the right staff are working and communication aligns, residents can receive genuine, personable attention. However, these strengths are uneven and do not cancel out the broader pattern described elsewhere in the feedback.
The most troubling themes center on basic operations and trust. Families commonly report difficulty communicating with the facility, with references to unanswered calls and a sense that concerns are not promptly addressed. More alarming are accusations that rehab services are not delivered as promised and that staff behavior can veer toward rude or inconsistent, especially given frequent changes in administrative leadership. The environment itself is described as aging, with cleanliness problems that include odors and neglected public spaces. Such factors compound worries about ongoing medical oversight and the reliability of care plans.
The day-to-day realities of this community, older infrastructure, intermittent upkeep, and frequent personnel shifts, directly affect continuity of care. A revolving door at the top and variable staff attitudes undermine confidence in a stable care team, which is critical for seniors relying on consistent rehab guidance and timely response to needs. For families who cannot be physically present daily, these gaps become amplified, raising legitimate concerns about safety, dignity, and the ability to monitor a loved one’s progress.
The bottom line is practical and actionable. Parish Family Care Home can be a viable option for budget-conscious families who are comfortable with a do-it-yourself oversight model and do not require a highly reliable rehab program or flawless facility conditions. For others, especially those prioritizing dependable rehab, steady leadership, open family communication, and a consistently clean environment, carefully weighing alternatives is essential. Pros that exist are real but not reliably dependable, trapped between helpful staff moments and systemic weaknesses. Before deciding, families should demand a clear rehab plan, request direct contact with the current administrator for a candid discussion, and assess the facility’s cleanliness, maintenance schedule, and staffing stability during a live visit. If those assurances cannot be secured, exploring other local options with stronger governance and consistently high standards is the prudent course.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit
Senior Transition Services: Understanding Their Role, Cost, and Importance
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living