Meriden Care Home

Pros

• The staff are professional, caring, and loving.
• The reviewer thanks the staff for their services.

Cons

• The reviewer alleges elder abuse and neglect by the facility, including not feeding or caring for the elderly resident.
• They say the resident was bedridden and left alone in a room, effectively left to rot.
• They claim the facility charged $400 for care that was not provided.
• They assert hospice removed the resident after the abuse was discovered, indicating severe mistreatment.
• They state the staff showed disregard for a human being and should be in jail.
• They warn others not to send their loved ones there.

Review

There is a wide gulf between experiences at this eldercare facility, as reflected by two very different voices from people who have interacted with it. One caller attempted to inquire about opportunities and was told that there were no openings because the facility had just hired someone and wasn't looking for anyone else right now. What followed, however, was a much more troubling set of claims about how a loved one had been treated once admitted and then moved through the facility's hands-off, under-resourced routines. The contrast between this brief exchange about hiring and the deeper, harsher accusations that later emerged paints a picture of a place that can feel very different depending on who is involved and when.

The primary negative review is a searing indictment of neglect and possible abuse. The author warns other families explicitly not to send their loved ones there, one of the strongest cautions you can hear in a care setting. The reviewer says their brother was brought to the facility from the hospital and remained there for four days before hospice intervened and removed him, citing elderly abuse as the reason. According to the account, the brother was not fed and did not receive adequate care while there and was bedridden as a result. A chilling anecdote is shared about a granddaughter bringing a sandwich to the brother, only to find that the sandwich had not moved from where it had been left the day before, suggesting neglect or failure to attend to basic needs. The emotional weight of the situation is underscored by the claim that the brother now fears being left alone by anyone and that he was effectively left to rot in a room. The reviewer doesn't stop at neglect; they also accuse the facility of financial exploitation, stating that they were charged $400 for care that did not take place. The overall sentiment is one of outrage at what they perceive as a systemic disregard for a vulnerable person, culminating in a blunt assertion that the people involved should face jail. The reviewer even notes they rated the place with only one star because zero was not an option, signaling a level of dissatisfaction that goes beyond a bad day and into a strong moral condemnation of care practices.

In stark contrast to that harrowing account, another review presents a completely different experience, one that condenses into praise for the staff and operations. Describing the facility as "Awesome Assisted Living For The Elderly," this reviewer emphasizes positive interactions with the people who work there, characterizing them as professional, caring, and loving. The language used is warm and affirming, thanking the staff for the services provided and asserting that the care delivered met or exceeded expectations. This perspective highlights the possibility that, within the same facility, residents and families can experience genuine kindness, attentiveness, and a high standard of personal interaction that leaves a lasting, favorable impression.

The juxtaposition of these two views raises important questions about what determines quality in elder care. If one person's experience is defined by neglect or abuse, and another's by compassion and reliability, the difference could hinge on a variety of factors. Staffing levels, turnover, shifts, individual caregiver behavior, and how the facility handles transitions between hospital, hospice, and residential care can all influence day-to-day outcomes. Communication with families, the responsiveness of the administration, and the consistency of care plans are also likely drivers of the divergent experiences described. It is impossible to draw a single conclusion from these two reviews alone, but it is clear that perceptions of care can swing dramatically based on how care is administered in practice, not just on policy or promises.

What emerges from these accounts is a reminder that choosing an eldercare facility requires careful, multi-faceted due diligence. Prospective families should seek a transparent understanding of staffing ratios, protocols for feeding and medical assistance, and the facility's process for addressing concerns or allegations of neglect. Visiting in person, observing how staff interact with residents, reviewing recent inspection or accreditation records, and speaking directly with residents and other family members can help paint a fuller picture than a single review can provide. The strong emotions on display - both fear and gratitude - underscore the high stakes involved in elder care and the responsibility facilities bear to maintain consistent, compassionate, and accountable operations.

Ultimately, these stories reflect the reality that there is no uniform experience in any care setting. Some residents may encounter professional, loving, and attentive staff who make a real difference every day, while others may encounter situations that feel unsafe or uncaring. Families navigating this landscape should go beyond online notes and ratings; they should seek direct evidence of how care is delivered on the floor, how meals are supervised, how medical needs are met, and how concerns are resolved. Only by gathering a broad and concrete set of observations can families gauge whether a facility can truly be trusted with the most important responsibility of all: the safety, comfort, and dignity of a loved one.

This part of Las Vegas, Nevada offers a convenient location with a variety of amenities nearby for seniors looking to retire in the area. With multiple pharmacies, restaurants, cafes, physicians, hospitals, and places of worship within a few miles radius, residents can easily access essential services and enjoy dining options. The proximity to MountainView Hospital and several medical facilities provides peace of mind for any healthcare needs. Additionally, the presence of popular chain restaurants like Wendy's and Chick-Fil-A offer convenient dining choices. The availability of public transportation options such as the Las Vegas Monorail stations makes it easy for seniors to explore the city or access entertainment venues like The LINQ Hotel & Casino. Overall, this neighborhood offers convenience and accessibility for those looking to enjoy their retirement years in Las Vegas.

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.8 miles)
• Smith's Food & Drug (2.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.7 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (2.9 miles)
• Albertsons Pharmacy (3 miles)
• Smith's Food & Drug (3 miles)

Restaurants

• Wendy's (1.7 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (2.4 miles)
• Fremont Street Experience (3.7 miles)
• The Phoenix Bar & Lounge (3.7 miles)
• The Marketplace (4.6 miles)
• McDonald's (4.8 miles)
• Peppermill Inn (4.9 miles)

Physicians

• Nevada Spine Clinic (2.7 miles)
• MountainView Hospital (3 miles)
• Southwest Medical Rancho Urgent Care (3 miles)
• Center For Sight (3.1 miles)
• Las Vegas Radiology (3.2 miles)
• Longford Medical Building (3.4 miles)
• Nevada Orthopedic & Spine Center (3.4 miles)

Hospitals

• Mountain View Hospital-Labor and Delivery (3 miles)
• Cheyenne Care Center (5.3 miles)

Cafes

• Dutch Bros Coffee (3.8 miles)
• Starbucks (4.7 miles)
• Starbucks (5.4 miles)
• The LINQ Hotel & Casino (5.8 miles)

Transportation

• Las Vegas Monorail - Sahara Station (4.6 miles)
• Las Vegas Monorail - Harrah's/Quad Station (5.8 miles)
• ARIA Express Bellagio Station (6.2 miles)

Places of Worship

• Iglesia Ni Cristo (5.5 miles)