Evergreen Living Costs & Pricing
Evergreen Living offers competitive pricing for its living spaces compared to both Clark County and the broader state of Nevada. For instance, a studio at Evergreen Living is priced at $2,435 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,407 and the state average of $3,567. Similarly, the one-bedroom apartments are available for $3,001, which remains attractive when set against Clark County's rate of $3,346 and Nevada's average of $3,619. However, the two-bedroom option at Evergreen Living is priced at $4,395, which does exceed the county average of $3,433 and state average of $3,949. Overall, Evergreen Living positions itself as a cost-effective choice for individuals and couples seeking quality accommodations while providing an appealing advantage over regional competitors in several categories.
| Floor plans | Evergreen Living | Clark County | Nevada |
|---|
| Studio | $2,435 | $3,407 | $3,567 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,001 | $3,346 | $3,619 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,395 | $3,433 | $3,949 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$260 / mo
Oakmont of the Lakes
$2,695 to $3,795 / month
10.5 miles away
-
from +$265 / mo
Prestige Assisted Living at Mira Loma
$2,700 to $5,475 / month
19.1 miles away
-
About the same
Desert View Senior Living
$2,375 to $3,895 / month
3.4 miles away
-
from +$261 / mo
Oakmont of Las Vegas
$2,696 to $3,895 / month
16.1 miles away
-
from -$390 / mo
Sterling Ridge
$2,045 to $4,100 / month
13.7 miles away
Overall Review of Evergreen Living
caveat
16 reviews mention this
Staff friendliness and responsiveness vary
Residents describe both very helpful staff and serious communication breakdowns.
Many reviews praise staff as professional, friendly, and attentive, including front desk and case managers who are responsive to questions and concerns. Several other reviews, however, describe delayed or missed communication, difficulty reaching the facility by phone, and poor follow-through on care updates and scheduling. A few reviewers specifically call out problems with case management and discharge coordination. Overall, the experiences residents share are uneven, with strong praise in some stays and major frustrations in others.
common
13 reviews mention this
Care cleanliness and quiet stand out
Residents frequently mention the facility feels clean and orderly.
Multiple reviews highlight cleanliness and an overall well-kept environment, with comments about the facility being clean, orderly, and sometimes quiet. Some families also describe the building as bright and open, and impressed with what they saw during a visit before a loved one arrived. A small number of negative reviews describe neglect-related issues and basic-care gaps, which directly contradict the cleanliness praise. Taken together, residents often focus on cleanliness, but the day-to-day care is not consistently described the same way.
differentiator
10 reviews mention this
Rehab therapy is a major focus
Residents consistently discuss therapy teams and rehabilitation progress.
Reviews repeatedly mention physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy, with several describing noticeable improvement and support in learning activities again. Some reviewers also describe therapy as active and goal-oriented, including multiple sessions and staff who encourage patients to do more for themselves. On the other hand, a few negative reviews argue that rehab attention was insufficient or not aligned with the person’s needs, particularly after strokes and other injuries. The overall pattern is that therapy matters greatly to residents, with outcomes depending on the individual experience.
common
4 reviews mention this
Dining is often praised, with exceptions
Many residents reference the quality of food served.
Some reviews describe meals as good, appetizing, and better than expected, including praise tied to how food looked and was served. A few residents mention dietary concerns or specific issues, such as vegetables being cold or general food dissatisfaction. Overall, dining shows up as a relatively consistent point in feedback, but it is not universally mentioned the same way. The community offers meal preparation and service that aligns with how residents talk about food on-site.
caveat
14 reviews mention this
Basic care and call response get criticized
Several residents report delayed help with basics and call-button response.
A number of reviews describe trouble getting staff to respond, including long waits after pressing call buttons and instances where assistance was not provided when needed. Some also mention missed or delayed hygiene, showers, medication concerns, and periods where patients appeared unattended. Several of the most negative accounts connect these issues to safety and a decline in health or recovery. While other reviews describe attentive nursing and CNAs, the critical feedback around day-to-day responsiveness is a recurring theme.
caveat
7 reviews mention this
Case management can make-or-break experience
Case management support is praised by some but criticized for delays and errors by others.
Some reviewers credit case workers with being responsive and helpful, including support with discharge planning and navigating care after a facility stay. Other reviews describe delayed or absent communication from case managers, missed appointments, and problems coordinating discharge logistics. A few describe family training and care coordination as not happening as expected, with other staff stepping in only after concerns were raised. The reviews suggest that outcomes depend heavily on how case management runs in each situation.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.