Suite Living Maplewood

Memory care communities with a similar price nearby

• from -$213 / mo

  Abiitan Mill City

  4.8 from 39 reviews

  $1,537 to $2,396 / month

  11.2 miles away
• from -$304 / mo

  Oak Meadows

  4.7 from 54 reviews

  $1,446 to $3,500 / month

  6.1 miles away
• About the same

  SummerWood of Plymouth

  4.3 from 17 reviews

  $1,704 to $3,945 / month

  22.0 miles away
• from +$124 / mo

  The Glenn Hopkins

  4.5 from 114 reviews

  $1,874 to $3,449 / month

  20.0 miles away
• from -$55 / mo

  Cardigan Ridge Senior Living

  4.6 from 51 reviews

  $1,695 to $3,250 / month

  4.0 miles away

Pros

• The staff were friendly and welcoming to residents during tours.
• The building was clean and offered a lot of great amenities for residents.
• The grandmother likes staying there.
• The staff are willing to take residents outside for smoke breaks.
• There is a kitchen in the room for residents to use to cook for themselves.
• The facility is nice, especially compared to the nursing home.
• The entrance is clean and secure, with buzz-in access.

Cons

• The meals smell awful.
• The sign-in procedure is concerning because identity checks are not performed, raising fears that someone may steal from the resident.
• The shared room arrangement lacks privacy because the divider does not reach the ceiling, allowing conversations to be overheard.
• Single rooms are not offered unless paid out of pocket, which the family cannot afford.
• The current room arrangement, being large and shared, is disliked and a smaller private room would be preferred.
• The facility is relatively expensive and reluctant to fully accept government aid.
• Requiring 12 months of financial security before moving in may be prohibitive.

Review

Suite Living Maplewood is best suited for seniors who want a clean, secure, and sociable living environment close to home, with enough structure to support daily independence. The community presents well: bright common spaces, ample amenities, and a buzz-in entrance that gives families peace of mind. Residences span studios and one-bedrooms, with pond-facing options that add a pleasant backdrop to daily life. For those who value friendly, accessible staff and a structured social calendar, Maplewood delivers. It is less suitable for residents who insist on private, included-room privacy at baseline or who rely primarily on government funding without the ability to bridge potential cost gaps.

Those weighing alternatives should note that privacy needs are a decisive factor. If a guaranteed private room included in the base price is non-negotiable, or if government aid is the primary funding method, other communities may offer better financial alignment. For residents requiring higher levels of medical oversight or memory-specific care, this location may fall short of the specialized supports found in facilities dedicated to memory care or higher-acuity assisted living. In short, Maplewood shines on warmth and practicality, but it does not fit every budget or care profile.

The strongest positives are tangible. Staff come across as genuinely friendly and welcoming, especially during tours, and the building maintains a high standard of cleanliness. Amenities support an active lifestyle, and the security emphasis, evident in the entrance protocol, helps families feel comfortable. The team’s follow-up after initial contact signals a culture of attentiveness, which can ease the transition. Having multiple unit sizes, including studios and one-bedrooms, gives families practical flexibility to balance privacy and cost, enhancing overall suitability for varied resident needs.

Yet, the cons carry real weight. Shared rooms with only partial dividers can erode privacy and acoustic comfort, a meaningful downside for residents who value quiet and personal space. The base price does not include private rooms, and the resulting out-of-pocket costs can strain budgets, especially for those who hoped to avoid premium-room charges. Security remains solid, but concerns linger about the visitor sign-in process, while the facility is buzzed in, there is a lingering perception of lax checks. Food quality is inconsistent in perception: one reviewer noted odors, even as the resident enjoyed the meals. Financial terms are another friction point: the facility is relatively expensive and requires demonstrating 12 months of financial security before moving in, with limited willingness to fully accommodate government assistance.

On balance, the core strengths, affectionate, energetic staff; a clean, well-equipped, secure environment; and a living footprint that supports social engagement, offset many everyday inconveniences for families who can tolerate shared space and plan finances accordingly. The follow-up culture and responsive attitudes help maintain trust and reduce uncertainty during a transition. However, the price structure and privacy trade-offs are not trivial; they determine whether Maplewood remains a short-list option or moves to the back burner for families prioritizing private living space or tighter budget constraints. This community meets routine care expectations robustly, but it is not the pick for all paths.

For families evaluating Maplewood, the practical move is to confirm room configurations, verify monthly costs versus any add-ons, and establish a clear plan if government aid becomes necessary. Probe the 12-month financial reserve requirement and explore whether any flexibility exists in funding arrangements. If private-room privacy and predictable budgeting are paramount, compare with communities that guarantee included private accommodations and offer more flexible financing. If the priorities align with security, staff engagement, and an active, social environment, Suite Living Maplewood deserves serious consideration, provided a clear plan exists to manage room costs and financing without compromising on privacy.