Canterbury-on-the-Lake Costs & Pricing
Canterbury-on-the-Lake presents a competitive pricing structure for its various room types when compared to the broader market in Oakland County and the state of Michigan. For instance, the cost of a studio unit at Canterbury is $2,510, significantly lower than the county average of $4,577 and the state's average of $3,824. Similarly, one-bedroom apartments are priced at $3,053, which remains favorable compared to both the county's $3,507 and the state's $3,384. However, when looking at two-bedroom accommodations, Canterbury's rate of $4,058 is higher than both local ($3,881) and state averages ($3,523). Additionally, their semi-private rooms are priced considerably higher at $5,888 versus the county's $3,204 and state's $3,191. This analysis reveals that while Canterbury-on-the-Lake offers more attractive pricing for studios and one-bedrooms compared to its peers, it does maintain a premium for two-bedroom units and semi-private options that might warrant further consideration by potential residents.
| Floor plans | Canterbury-on-the-Lake | Oakland County | Michigan |
|---|
| Studio | $2,510 | $4,577 | $3,824 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,053 | $3,507 | $3,384 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,058 | $3,881 | $3,523 |
| Semi-Private | $5,888 | $3,204 | $3,189 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$490 / mo
Hutcheson Manor
$3,000 to $4,500 / month
15.7 miles away
-
from +$490 / mo
Butternut Hill Senior Living
$3,000 to $4,000 / month
12.0 miles away
-
from +$390 / mo
Metacare Inc
$2,900 to $3,300 / month
19.3 miles away
-
from +$490 / mo
Vicinia Gardens Transition
$3,000 to $4,500 / month
17.7 miles away
-
from -$235 / mo
Pleasant Valley Family Care
$2,275 to $7,000 / month
12.7 miles away
Overall Review of Canterbury-on-the-Lake
caveat
11 reviews mention this
Staff responsiveness is inconsistent
Several families report delayed or missed help after call buttons.
A recurring complaint is that call lights went unanswered for long stretches, leaving residents waiting for basic needs like assistance with eating, bathroom help, or hydration. Some reviewers describe staff not showing up for hours, including reports of residents left in soiled clothing or urine while waiting. There are also accounts of delayed physician response when medical issues arise, and families describing the need to create rotating shifts to cover care.
common
15 reviews mention this
Food quality runs both ways
Food is often praised, but some residents receive it cold.
Many reviewers describe meals as good, sometimes praising specific dietary attention and better-than-other-facilities food. Residents and families also mention restaurant-style dining and room-meal flexibility, aligning with the community’s dining options. At the same time, multiple reviews criticize food served cold, and at least a few families describe needing to argue to ensure the correct diet.
differentiator
4 reviews mention this
Care across multiple levels
Residents and families value having multiple care levels on campus.
Several reviews highlight the ability to transition between different levels of senior living within the same overall community, including independent living, assisted living, and memory care. Families also describe continuity benefits when care needs change, without needing to move to a completely separate place. This matches the community’s listed care types and the on-site care services and support areas.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Cleanliness is a mixed point
Some reviews describe persistent cleanliness and odor issues.
While some residents and visitors say the building is clean and well maintained, other reviews describe filthy carpets, unclean rooms or bathrooms, and lingering urine odors. A few families also tie cleanliness concerns to care timing, including reports of residents left in soiled items for extended periods. These negative experiences stand out because they describe both appearance and sanitation rather than only staff behavior.
common
10 reviews mention this
Activities help residents stay engaged
Residents frequently mention a steady schedule of activities.
Reviews commonly describe residents participating in groups and events, including outings, exercise or stretching, games, live performances, and community gatherings. A number of families say their loved ones became more social or more engaged after moving in. This aligns with the activity programming listed for the community.
differentiator
2 reviews mention this
Pricing is often positioned as lower
Compared with county and state benchmarks, pricing is shown as lower across units.
Pricing is presented as below county and state levels across the listed unit types, which can be a meaningful advantage for families comparing monthly costs. Reviews do include some concern about affordability or that the cost felt higher than expected, so value may depend on which unit and care level a family needs. Overall, the community’s pricing positioning appears more favorable than typical benchmarks, even though a minority of reviewers felt it ran above their expectations.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.