3137 Cedar Valley Drive, Traverse City, MI 49684
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Cedar Valley Home offers a competitive monthly rate for its private rooms at $3,000, which stands out favorably when compared to both Leelanau County and the broader state of Michigan. In Leelanau County, the average cost for similar accommodations is approximately $3,526, while across the state of Michigan, that figure rises to around $3,675 per month. This pricing positions Cedar Valley Home as an attractive option for those seeking high-quality care without exceeding their budget, emphasizing the facility's commitment to providing accessible yet comprehensive services in a nurturing environment.
| Floor plans | Cedar Valley Home | Leelanau County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $3,000 | $3,526 | $3,674 |
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
There is a strong feeling of disappointment and frustration that runs through these accounts, a sense that promises were made but largely ignored once commitments were needed the most. The first narrator makes a clear upfront judgment: they would never recommend Jim or Jerry as builders. The core complaint isn't just about a single misstep; it's about consistently unfulfilled promises and a process that dragged on far longer than planned. What was described as a project that should have been completed in four months stretched into more than a year, a timeline that carried with it ongoing disappointments and mounting frustrations. The tone suggests that the builders were repeatedly nonresponsive to the needs of the homeowner, and that the homeowner had to shoulder the burden of managing the project in a way that should have been the builders' responsibility.
The delay isn't framed as a minor inconvenience but as a defining characteristic of the experience. The reviewer emphasizes that they had to engage in continual follow-up and persistence just to keep things moving. This isn't portrayed as a temporary hiccup; it's described as a persistent pattern of inaction or slow progress. The sense conveyed is that communication was unreliable and that obtaining timely updates was a constant battle. This persistent need for follow-up likely contributed to a feeling of being undervalued as a client and created continuous uncertainty about whether the project would ever reach completion.
Another vivid issue raised is the impact on the surrounding environment and neighbors. The reviewer mentions having to pick up trash themselves to keep it from blowing into the neighbor's yard, a detail that underscores a broader concern about job site management and responsibility. Such a description goes beyond dissatisfaction with scheduling or budget and points to a worry about basic housekeeping and respect for neighbors' property. The implication is that shoddy site maintenance wasn't just a personal irritation; it posed a direct nuisance to the community and a failure of standard professional conduct expected from a construction project.
The closing sentiment about the builders as a whole is harsh: they are described as a "disgrace to Warsaw homes," a sweeping judgment that frames the entire enterprise in the most negative light. The phrase "a year of frustrations" recurs, underscoring a prolonged and emotionally draining experience rather than a minor misstep. The emphasis here is on the cumulative toll - the time, energy, and emotional strain of dealing with a project that failed to meet reasonable expectations and professional standards. The reviewer's closing stance reflects a deep sense of disappointment and a strong warning to others who might consider engaging these builders.
A second account adds layers of specificity about a different but related experience with Shoreview Builders doing business as Waussau Homes. This reviewer describes the situation as among the worst they have encountered with any contractor. The narrative highlights a relentless need to repeat requests, to chase confirmations, and to push for acknowledgment of concerns. The sense is that the communication loop was broken, forcing the homeowner to expend substantial effort simply to obtain answers or updates. The frustration is described as ongoing, with the homeowner repeatedly having to reiterate issues that should have been addressed without prodding.
The second reviewer also notes an important dynamic: a complaint was taken up to the parent company about unprofessional comments. They say the parent company indicated that they could not intervene effectively because the contractor was a franchisee. This detail points to a structural limitation in how much accountability the corporate entity could enact over a locally owned franchise. It adds a layer of complexity to the dissatisfaction, suggesting that even when concerns were raised at a higher level, the homeowner felt there was insufficient ability to compel meaningful action because of the franchise relationship.
Communication in this case appears to have deteriorated into a stalemate. When concerns were brought to the builder, the responses were dismissive or noncommittal, and after more than thirty days, the builder reportedly stated that he did not know what to say but that he disagreed. That moment is portrayed as emblematic of a broader pattern: a lack of constructive dialogue, avoidance of responsibility, and an unwillingness to admit fault or provide reassurance. The homeowner's experience culminates in a legal step, with the statement that they were left with filing a lawsuit to recover monies owed based on what they describe as inaccuracies in what the builder told them. This outcome reveals a breakdown in trust and a perception that the relationship with the builder had deteriorated to the point where legal action became necessary.
Taken together, these narratives present a portrait of a construction experience marked by broken promises, protracted timelines, and burdens borne by the homeowner rather than the builder. The repeated need for follow-up, the neglect of site cleanliness, the sense of being undervalued as a client, and the ultimate resort to legal action all contribute to an overwhelmingly negative view of the builders involved. The emphasis on franchise dynamics adds a further dimension: even when concerns were escalated, there was a sense that centralized or corporate intervention was limited, leaving the homeowner feeling both unheard and unsupported. In sum, these experiences illustrate a troubling pattern of communication gaps, delayed progress, and disputed representations that culminated in significant personal and financial strain for those involved.
Cedar Valley Home in Traverse City, MI is a fully furnished assisted living community that offers a comfortable and convenient lifestyle for seniors. The community provides numerous amenities to enhance the residents' experience, including a dining room where delicious meals are served, beautiful gardens where residents can enjoy the outdoors, and housekeeping services to ensure a clean and tidy living environment.
At Cedar Valley Home, residents can also take advantage of move-in coordination services to make their transition smooth and hassle-free. The community offers telephone and Wi-Fi/high-speed internet access for staying connected with loved ones and the outside world.
Care services provided at Cedar Valley Home focus on meeting the needs of each resident. Trained staff members are available to assist with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. They also coordinate with health care providers to ensure comprehensive care. Medication management is offered to help residents keep track of their medications, while special dietary restrictions like diabetes diet are accommodated during meal preparation and service.
Transportation arrangement for medical appointments is one of the convenient services offered at Cedar Valley Home. Residents can rely on the community for transportation to doctor's appointments when needed. In terms of nearby amenities, there are two cafes, three parks, eleven pharmacies, forty-three physicians' offices, thirty-three restaurants, two places of worship, one theater, and five hospitals in close proximity to the community.
Cedar Valley Home strives to create an engaging atmosphere for its residents by offering scheduled daily activities. Whether it's participating in social events or pursuing personal hobbies and interests, residents have plenty of opportunities to stay active and fulfilled.
Overall, Cedar Valley Home in Traverse City provides a supportive environment where seniors can receive personalized care while enjoying a vibrant lifestyle surrounded by both essential amenities and enriching nearby attractions.
Cedar Valley Home offers a competitive monthly rate for its private rooms at $3,000, which stands out favorably when compared to both Leelanau County and the broader state of Michigan. In Leelanau County, the average cost for similar accommodations is approximately $3,526, while across the state of Michigan, that figure rises to around $3,675 per month. This pricing positions Cedar Valley Home as an attractive option for those seeking high-quality care without exceeding their budget, emphasizing the facility's commitment to providing accessible yet comprehensive services in a nurturing environment.
Cedar Valley Home is located at 3137 Cedar Valley Drive, Traverse City, MI 49684 in Leelanau County, Michigan
The Villa At Traverse Point
Traverse City, MI
Extensive on-site amenities and comprehensive care services (24-hour supervision, medication management, dining, transportation, wellness programs, and activities).
The Villa At Traverse Point reviews
The Villa At Traverse Point images
Holiday Glen Eagle
Traverse City, MI
Pet-friendly, accommodating staff, and a well-maintained, activity-rich community.
Holiday Glen Eagle costs
Holiday Glen Eagle reviews
Holiday Glen Eagle images
Bay Ridge Assisted Living Center
Traverse City, MI
Well-maintained, clean environment with friendly, caring staff.
Bay Ridge Assisted Living Center costs
Bay Ridge Assisted Living Center reviews
The Village at Bay Ridge
Traverse City, MI
Quality of care and cleanliness with broad on-site amenities and a pet-friendly policy.
The Village at Bay Ridge costs
The Village at Bay Ridge reviews
The Village at Bay Ridge images
Cordia at Grand Traverse Commons
Traverse City, MI
Beautiful facility with attentive staff, engaging activities, and gourmet dining.
Cordia at Grand Traverse Commons costs
Cordia at Grand Traverse Commons reviews
Cordia at Grand Traverse Commons images
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
Medicaid coverage for assisted living varies by state and is primarily available to low-income individuals, with eligibility dependent on strict income and asset limits. Some states offer HCBS waivers for specific services in assisted living, but families must generally cover room and board costs, and should verify facility acceptance of Medicaid while considering potential waiting lists.
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Medicaid waivers for assisted living services provide vital support for seniors and individuals with disabilities in need of long-term care, with varying state-specific eligibility criteria and benefits. These waivers cover personal care and case management but often do not fully cover room and board, leading to waiting lists for many applicants.
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
The article examines the complexities of assisted living for individuals with disabilities, emphasizing the need for tailored care solutions that enhance quality of life and social inclusion, while addressing financial challenges and advocating for community integration. It discusses various housing options, the importance of financial assistance through public benefits, and highlights trends towards integrated and technology-driven solutions in disability-focused housing.