Provision Living at Fenton Costs & Pricing
Provision Living at Fenton offers a competitive pricing structure for its various room types compared to the averages in Oakland County and across Michigan. For semi-private accommodations, residents can expect to pay $3,000 per month, which is notably lower than the county average of $3,204 and the state average of $3,191. The cost for two-bedroom units is set at $3,900, slightly above the county's average of $3,881 but significantly lower than Michigan's overall average of $3,523. Private rooms are priced at $3,990, aligning closely with both county and state figures that stand at $3,708 and $3,675 respectively. Studio apartments are available for $4,250, which remains competitive given that the county rate is higher at $4,577 while the state average is more manageable at $3,824. Lastly, one-bedroom units present a stark contrast; priced at $5,750 per month at Provision Living Fenton compared to just $3,507 in Oakland County and $3,384 statewide. Overall, Provision Living provides a range of options that may appeal to residents looking for quality care within a structured budget.
| Floor plans | Provision Living at Fenton | Oakland County | Michigan |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $3,204 | $3,189 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,900 | $3,881 | $3,523 |
| Private | $3,990 | $3,708 | $3,674 |
| Studio | $4,250 | $4,577 | $3,824 |
| 1 Bedroom | $5,750 | $3,507 | $3,384 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$200 / mo
Dragonfly Manor
$2,800 to $3,000 / month
24.1 miles away
-
from -$500 / mo
Sunset Pines AFC
$2,500 to $3,500 / month
19.6 miles away
-
from -$100 / mo
Metacare Inc
$2,900 to $3,300 / month
23.7 miles away
-
from +$500 / mo
Green Valley Place
$3,500 to $4,000 / month
18.1 miles away
-
About the same
Vicinia Gardens Transition
$3,000 to $4,500 / month
1.0 miles away
Overall Review of Provision Living at Fenton
common
32 reviews mention this
Staff kindness is a consistent theme
Residents and families consistently describe a friendly, caring team that follows through.
Many reviewers describe staff as friendly, helpful, knowledgeable, and caring, often emphasizing communication and follow-up. Several people also say the team treats residents like family and works to include residents and families in day-to-day life. A few reviews mention smoother coordination or a quicker transition during moving and care setup, while others criticize overall managementāstill, the dominant pattern is kindness and responsiveness.
common
13 reviews mention this
Clean, welcoming spaces stand out
Multiple reviews highlight the building and common areas as clean and welcoming.
Across visits and stays, reviewers repeatedly describe the facility as clean, inviting, and well maintained, with common areas they found comfortable. Some also point to room and layout quality, including thoughtful space for daily life. Even where care concerns are raised, cleanliness and the overall environment are still mentioned positively by multiple reviewers.
caveat
9 reviews mention this
Care coordination and monitoring vary
Reviews describe strong communication and monitoring in some cases, but gaps in specialized medical support appear in others.
Several reviewers say the community coordinated care well and communicated clearly with families, including help with healthcare questions and updates. Some also describe care monitoring tools and ongoing clinical support such as nursing and therapy coverage. At the same time, multiple reviews raise concerns about limitations in nursing care, difficulty arranging specialty referrals, or medication management issues, and those gaps are part of the reason some people hesitate to recommend based on medical needs.
common
7 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Residents and families describe a calendar of programs that helps keep people busy.
Reviewers mention scheduled activities and social engagement, with some pointing to off-site outings and community-sponsored events. A few describe specific spaces for games, crafts, movies, and other group activities that support daily routines. In one cautionary note, a reviewer says they would want more evening options, suggesting the activity schedule may depend on what someone expects day-to-day.
caveat
4 reviews mention this
Dining gets mixed feedback
Food quality is praised by some residents, while other reviewers report problems with dining service.
Several reviewers describe meals positively, including comments about healthy, creative dishes and that residents enjoy eating together. At least one reviewer, however, says the food service is poor, with limited options and difficulty accessing food information. Overall, dining feedback appears inconsistent, with stronger praise than complaints but enough negative comments to consider carefully.
caveat
5 reviews mention this
Pricing feels expensive for some
Several reviewers say the costs are high compared with other options.
A number of reviewers describe the community as more expensive, and at least one person compares it directly to other assisted living options as a reason not to choose it. Another review mentions charges increasing after move-in, which added uncertainty about how care levels and pricing line up over time. Based on the pricing comparisons provided, the community is priced below county and state levels across unit types, but reviews still focus on overall affordability concerns.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.