15911 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20905
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Wellness Touch Care Costs & Pricing
Wellness Touch Care offers competitive pricing for its services, especially when compared to both Montgomery County and the wider state of Maryland. For semi-private rooms, Wellness Touch Care charges $3,200, which is significantly lower than the county average of $4,337 and just slightly below the state average of $3,545. Similarly, for private rooms, their rate of $3,500 stands favorably against Montgomery County's average of $5,009 and Maryland's state rate of $4,112. This pricing structure positions Wellness Touch Care as an affordable option without compromising quality, making it an appealing choice for those seeking care in this region.
| Floor plans | Wellness Touch Care | Montgomery County | Maryland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,200 | $4,337 | $3,545 |
| Private | $3,500 | $5,009 | $4,112 |
Overall Review of Wellness Touch Care
Pros
The place is lovely.- It is bright, well kept, and very clean.
- The inside is immaculate.
- The owner is very nice.
Cons
The price is a little high in comparison to the others.- It is too expensive.
- It is not an MW participant.
Review
Wellness Touch Care in Silver Spring, MD is best suited for families seeking a small, well-kept, home-like setting where cleanliness and personal attention define daily life. This community fits seniors who want peers at a similar level of independence, not a high-acuity or cookie-cutter campus. The bright, immaculate interiors signal a calm, respectful environment, and the hands-on owner suggests responsive, direct communication. For families prioritizing dignity, daily neatness, and a personal touch over size or hustle, Wellness Touch Care offers a compelling match. It is particularly appealing to those who value a finely maintained space and close-knit, neighborly dynamics.
Those watching budgets or relying on public funding will want to explore other options. The pricing is flagged as high, and one review notes the community is not MW participant, signaling limited access to Medicaid/waiver-like support. For families needing more robust medical oversight, memory-care programming, or a larger campus with more structured activities and housing tiers, alternatives with broader funding or care levels may deliver greater value. In short, affordability and funding flexibility should drive the search beyond this single community.
Pros are tangible: the facility is immaculate, and common areas read as orderly and inviting. The owner’s demeanor is described as pleasant, which often translates into smoother communications and quicker responsiveness to family questions or changes in a resident’s plan. Residents appearing at the same level as the prospective resident suggests a compatible social milieu, reducing concerns about isolation or mismatch. These factors, cleanliness, leadership accessibility, and peer fit, address foundational comfort and day-to-day well-being, making it easier for families to imagine a smooth transition and ongoing satisfaction.
Cons revolve primarily around cost and funding flexibility. The rate is characterized as expensive relative to competitors, which matters for long-term budgeting and family decisions. The lack of MW participation raises questions about eligibility for public assistance programs, potentially limiting options for lower-income residents or those drawing on waivers. While the setting and leadership quality are attractive, the price-to-value equation becomes less compelling for households that must balance quality with affordability or for those whose funding sources require subsidized care.
Where the positives offset the drawbacks is in quality-of-life signals that families often cannot measure by price alone, cleanliness, calm environments, and direct access to a caring owner can translate into less stress, fewer maintenance worries, and a sense of safety. For residents who thrive in a small, orderly community and can justify the premium, those benefits may validate the higher cost. Yet the offset remains partial: without subsidy pathways, the premium price will strain budgets, and some families will prefer alternatives that combine similar ambiance with better funding flexibility and care level variety.
Bottom line: Wellness Touch Care serves a market segment that values pristine spaces, a hands-on owner, and a home-like, intimate community, and can absorb premium pricing for those benefits. It is less suitable for budget-conscious families or those needing Medicaid/waiver support or more extensive clinical care. Prospective residents should request a detailed pricing breakdown, confirm included services, care levels, and staffing norms, and arrange a visit focused on whether the resident’s daily rhythm aligns with the quiet, orderly life described. For careful, cost-aware planning, compare a few nearby options that offer similar cleanliness and personal oversight but with broader funding or care options before deciding.
5 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Activities off-site
Bath tubs
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Baltimore-Washington International (18 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
