18110 Cashell Road, Rockville, MD 20853
To contact a resident: (301) 460-6997
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Alfred House V Costs & Pricing
Alfred House V offers a range of living accommodations with prices that reflect the premium services and amenities provided. For semi-private rooms, residents can expect to pay between $5,000 and $6,000 monthly, which is notably higher than the Montgomery County average of $4,337 and the state average of $3,545. Those opting for a studio will find a fixed monthly cost of $6,500, surpassing both county ($5,542) and state ($4,656) averages as well. Private room rates are set at $7,000, significantly exceeding the local rate of $5,009 and the Maryland average of $4,112. These costs highlight Alfred House V's positioning in the market as a higher-end facility catering to those seeking exceptional care and community engagement.
| Floor plans | Alfred House V | Montgomery County | Maryland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $5,000 to $6,000 | $4,337 | $3,545 |
| Studio | $6,500 | $5,542 | $4,656 |
| Private | $7,000 | $5,009 | $4,112 |
Overall Review of Alfred House V
Pros
AlfredHouse is a first-rate facility with professional, caring staff.- AlfredHouse recreates a home-like environment in residents' rooms, making them comfortable and happy.
- The experience at AlfredHouse exceeds expectations.
- The staff look after residents closely, ensuring meals, medications, and daily care.
- The caregivers truly love the residents and give them individual attention.
- The facility is clean, safe, and well-maintained, with spacious, well-furnished rooms.
- Families feel fortunate to have found AlfredHouse and would highly recommend it.
Cons
Disgraceful—that sums up the AlfredHouse experience.- The care their loved one received was subpar, with dietary restrictions not followed, no activities or stimulation provided, and cheap-quality food.
- Management is rude and has no understanding of dementia or state regulations.
- The memory care tour offered limited choices, and the available room was in a separate building, which the reviewers did not like.
- AlfredHouse V lacks an exercise facility at present, though they mentioned plans to build one.
Review
AlfredHouse V in Rockville, MD, is best suited for families seeking a true home-like environment where care feels personal and continuously attentive. The house-style setting, spacious rooms, and intimate staffing model suit seniors who thrive on predictable daily routines and direct, compassionate supervision. For residents with multiple chronic conditions, including memory challenges, the care team is accustomed to tailoring plans and staying flexible as needs shift. Those who value privacy paired with strong 24/7 support will find a comfortable balance here, with options for private or shared baths, and dining that resembles a family kitchen. It is not the right fit for someone chasing a large-campus feel, aggressive rehab programming, or a facility saturated with formal, institutional amenities.
Alternatives become worth considering for families prioritizing a built-in gym or a single, integrated memory-care environment. Some reviewers noted memory-care spaces are sometimes in a separate building or have limited availability, which can hinder seamless transitioning or ongoing specialized programming. In such cases, exploring options with a unified memory-care wing or a larger campus may be prudent. For those who insist on a robust on-site fitness facility or a more centralized dementia program, a different community may offer a cleaner alignment of expectations and services.
The strongest positives at AlfredHouse V are the consistently professional, compassionate staff, and the clear commitment to individualized care. Families repeatedly describe aides and caregivers as loving, attentive, and genuinely engaged with residents’ daily needs, help with meals, hygiene, medications, and personal routines is delivered with steadiness and warmth. The environment is clean, updated, and well-maintained, with roomy, well-furnished living areas and well-appointed bathrooms. Food quality and dining ambience receive high marks, and the presence of a shared activities director, along with structured daily programming, helps maintain a sense of purpose and social connection for many residents.
On the downside, the most salient drawbacks center on cadence and structure in memory care and the gym expectation. The absence of an on-site gym is a practical gap for families who prioritize regular, facility-supported exercise. Memory-care availability appears inconsistent in some instances, and a few families report limited room choices or the sense of a separate, less integrated memory-care setting. There is also at least one strongly negative review that cites subpar care in certain domains, with complaints about dietary restrictions not being followed, a lack of activities, low-quality meals, and management that is described as rude. While this voice is not representative of the majority, it serves as a caution that expectations must be clearly surfaced and closely monitored.
Those benefits, home-like warmth, deeply attentive staff, clean and comfortable spaces, and reliable daily routines, help offset the most significant limitations. When care teams are allowed the flexibility to adapt to evolving needs, residents often thrive in this intimate setting more than in larger facilities where personalized attention can wane. The strong emphasis on family-like interaction, 24/7 support, and proactive daily engagement creates a tangible sense of safety and dignity for residents with memory issues or complex health needs. Yet the outlier experiences underscore the reality that good outcomes hinge on consistent leadership, reliable programming, and responsive dietary and activity planning.
For families evaluating AlfredHouse V, the practical next steps are clear. Schedule in-depth tours with a focus on memory care access and daily programming, and request to observe activities at different times of day. Verify current staffing ratios, speak candidly with caregivers about how care plans are coordinated, and review sample menus to ensure dietary restrictions are respected. Ask for a detailed breakdown of room types, especially for memory-care residents, and confirm the timeline for any planned gym or fitness enhancements. Compare with nearby AlfredHouse locations (Needwood, Symphony) and other regional options to ensure the chosen path aligns with priorities: intimate, hands-on care in a home-like setting, versus a broader campus with more built-in facilities. This approach will reveal whether AlfredHouse V’s strengths align with the family’s care priorities and budget, while acknowledging and mitigating the potential gaps.
16 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Activities on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ronald Reagan Washington National (21 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Hospice waiver
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
