6500 Old Sandy Spring Road, Laurel, MD 20707
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Shanti Home II Costs & Pricing
Shanti Home II offers competitive pricing for its residents, with monthly costs that align closely with the broader market in Prince George's County and the state of Maryland. For semi-private accommodations, Shanti Home II charges $3,300, which is slightly higher than the county average of $3,058 but remains below the state average of $3,545. Residents opting for private rooms will find a rate of $3,700 at Shanti Home II; this price is marginally lower than the county's average of $3,792 and noticeably more economical when compared to Maryland's overall average of $4,112. These rates reflect Shanti Home II's commitment to providing quality care at accessible prices while maintaining an inviting atmosphere for residents.
| Floor plans | Shanti Home II | Prince George's County | Maryland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,300 | $3,058 | $3,545 |
| Private | $3,700 | $3,792 | $4,112 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Shanti Home II
Pros
Shanti Homes provides excellent care and compassion with individualized care when needed.
Shanti is a wonderful person who becomes a friend to families.
The care at Shanti Homes is far better than what one would receive at a larger facility.
Shanti Homes is very nice and clean, and the staff keeps it well maintained.
Residents stay at Shanti Home for years, indicating satisfaction with the care.
Shanti coordinates with social workers to keep residents in familiar and comfortable settings when hospital discharges occur.
Review
Shanti Home II in Laurel, Maryland is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like assisted living option that delivers exceptionally personalized, compassionate care and strong dementia support within a familiar, intimate setting. This community shines when the priority is one-on-one attention, continuity of relationships, and a staff who can respond rapidly to individual needs while keeping a loved one in a comfortable, non-clinical environment.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families looking for a large, campus-style facility with broad programming, robust on-site medical oversight, or extensive rehab and therapy services. If a personâs expectations include extensive social calendars, formalized activity schedules, or a wide array of on-site specialists, the smaller scale of Shanti Home II may feel limiting. For residents requiring high-intensity medical management or a broad array of daily therapeutic services, a larger community could be a better fit.
The strongest positives center on individualized care and practical, compassionate leadership. Reviews highlight how care is tailored to the resident, with Shanti personally ensuring that needs are met and even coordinating discharge planning to keep a loved one at home when appropriate. The staffâs attentiveness translates into a trust-building dynamic with families, a quality that matters deeply when medical or daily living tasks demand careful attention. Cleanliness and a home-like atmosphere reinforce comfort and reduce the stress associated with transitions to care settings. The ability to address dementia care within this intimate setting is a clear advantage for families prioritizing familiarity and consistent mood for a memory-impaired loved one.
Those advantages help offset the absence of a large facility with extensive amenities. In a smaller setting, the person-in-charge model can mean fewer moving parts, reduced confusion, and quicker, more flexible responses to evolving needs, benefits that often outweigh the perceived drawbacks of a more modest footprint. The real-world impact is evident in anecdotes about keeping residents in place during hospital discharges and in the sense that long-term residents stay because they are well supported. The trade-off is that some families will miss the diversified programming and formal supports typical of bigger communities; Shanti Home II may require ongoing verification of what specific services (therapy, nurse availability, activity variety) are guaranteed on a daily basis.
Prospective residents should nevertheless approach with clear expectations about what is not documented in the available feedback. Staffing ratios, the extent of round-the-clock medical oversight, and the range of on-site therapies are not spelled out in the two reviews, and the small sample leaves questions about daily rhythms and unexpected care needs. The lack of multiple independent perspectives means families should seek direct confirmation on concrete details: how care plans are developed and updated, who oversees dementia care, the range of activities, meal options, and how transitions (rehab, hospital readmissions) would be managed without relocating the resident. A due-diligence tour paired with candid discussions will reveal whether the intimate model aligns with the anticipated level of clinical support.
In the end, the decision should hinge on priorities. If the goal is rigorous personalization, deep caregiver relationships, and a dementia-friendly, homelike environment, Shanti Home II warrants serious consideration and a careful, in-person evaluation. If the criterion centers on breadth of programming, expansive medical services, or a large community feel, it makes sense to compare with other options and possibly expand the search. The practical path is to request a detailed tour, review a sample weekly schedule, confirm staffing patterns and care plans, and clarify pricing inclusions and potential extra charges. With those steps, families can determine whether Shanti Home II will deliver the steadiness, dignity, and hands-on care that the loved one requires, or whether an alternative setting better aligns with the envisioned quality of daily life.












Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained