15804 Presswick Lane, Bowie, MD 20716
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Green Haven Assisted Living 2 Costs & Pricing
Green Haven Assisted Living 2 offers competitive pricing for its services, particularly when juxtaposed with the average costs in Prince George's County and across Maryland. For a semi-private room, residents are looking at a monthly fee of $3,700, which is notably higher than the county's average of $3,058 but still aligns closely with the state's average of $3,545. In terms of private accommodations, Green Haven charges $4,200 - a figure that surpasses both the county average ($3,792) and the state average ($4,112). The one-bedroom option stands out at $5,000 per month, significantly above Prince George's County's average of $3,568 and Maryland's state average of $3,904. While these rates may reflect a premium experience or additional services offered by Green Haven Assisted Living 2, potential residents and their families should weigh these costs against the quality of care and amenities available.
| Floor plans | Green Haven Assisted Living 2 | Prince George's County | Maryland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,700 | $3,058 | $3,545 |
| Private | $4,200 | $3,792 | $4,112 |
| 1 Bedroom | $5,000 | $3,568 | $3,904 |
Overall Review of Green Haven Assisted Living 2
Pros
The house was very clean.- They are now thriving in another assisted living facility.
Cons
The reviewer regrets placing their family member in that facility and moved them as quickly as possible.- The costs at GH House II included a non-refundable administrative fee, monthly fees that could increase after 30 days, and charges for supplies.
- The reviewer gave the facility one star because, although it was clean, the manager was terrible to work with.
- The manager increased the care level fee after 30 days and demanded payment or eviction, threatening to lose the non-refundable admin fee.
- The manager kept candy given to the resident and decided how much she could have, despite no restricted diet.
- Visitation rules changed frequently, visits were sometimes delayed, and it seemed the manager discouraged visits.
- There were no activities for residents beyond TV watching, and the manager was described as having a temper with a perceived lack of kindness and respect for therapists, residents, and family.
- The sister wasn’t thriving at the facility and has improved since leaving.
Review
Green Haven Assisted Living 2 in Bowie, MD is best suited for families that prize a clean, orderly environment and are prepared to tolerate a rigid, fee-focused operation. The facility delivers a well-kept, hygienic setting that removes environmental concerns from the decision equation for households prioritizing basic safety and tidiness. Yet cleanliness cannot compensate for a volatile financial picture or a manager-centered culture that tests patience and trust. For families seeking predictable budgeting, transparent terms, and steady, respectful communication, this community offers little beyond surface polish. The question becomes whether the comfort of a spotless space justifies navigating the rest of the package.
Alternatives should be on the radar for anyone who values reliable pricing and constructive resident engagement. The included non-refundable admin fee, a base monthly rate that climbed after 30 days, and ongoing supply costs create a shifting budget that erodes financial confidence. Visitation and social life were described as sporadic or discouraged, and staff interactions occasionally reflected a temperamental tone. If family members anticipate routine, transparent billing, consistent visitation policies, meaningful activities, and compassionate, accessible management, this community should not be the first stop. Several families report rapid improvements after moving to other facilities, signaling that a replacement option can deliver both dignity and financial clarity.
The key positive attribute, the facility’s cleanliness, offers tangible value, especially for households focused on hygiene and a calm living environment. However, that benefit is dwarfed by the principal drawbacks. The non-refundable admin fee, paired with rate increases after a short window, converts a seemingly affordable placement into an unpredictable expense. Additional charges for daily supplies further inflate monthly bills without clear justification, leaving families to chase explanations rather than secure confidence. When confronted with a demand to “pay more or move out” after only a month, the financial and emotional pressure becomes a decisive factor against long-term residency. In this calculus, surface polish does not offset the risk of rising costs or eroding trust in leadership.
Management dynamics and the social climate matter just as much as cleanliness. The narratives describe a manager who can be temperamental, coupled with visitation rules that shift with little apparent rationale. That combination creates an atmosphere in which families feel uncertain and residents may sense instability. Activities and meaningful engagement appear limited, contributing to a sense that residents are not thriving beyond mere containment. Such a culture undermines quality of life, complicating the caregiver-family partnership and complicating the transition for loved ones. In sum, a clean house cannot compensate for a volatile atmosphere or disengaged leadership.
Practical steps are essential for families weighing this option. Demand a current, itemized fee schedule with explicit caps or timelines for increases, and insist on a contract that clearly defines refundable elements and the criteria for any price changes. Seek conversations with current residents and their families about daily routines, activity calendars, and visitation consistency to gauge lived reality beyond marketing language. Review staffing levels, turnover, and state inspection records for safety and responsiveness. Compare with other communities in the area on cost predictability, activity opportunities, and the quality of resident relations. When possible, arrange extended visits to observe day-to-day life before committing.
Overall, Green Haven II presents a fragile value proposition: a clean, orderly environment that cannot compensate for a volatile cost structure and inconsistent, sometimes unfriendly management. The residence is unlikely to meet the needs of households prioritizing predictable pricing, proactive communication, and genuine social engagement. For many families, the prudent path is to explore alternatives first, facilities with transparent billing, steady leadership, and richer, more intentional activity programs. If choosing this community, proceed with caution, insist on contractual protections, and maintain a clear fallback plan that keeps financial surprises from derailing the care journey for a loved one.
5 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Activities on-site
Bath tubs
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ronald Reagan Washington National (17 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Art classes
BBQs or picnics
Birthday parties
Karaoke
Live musical performances
Stretching classes
Trivia games
Are Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease Lethal? A Comprehensive Exploration
Exploring the Power of Reminiscence Therapy for Individuals With Dementia
An In-Depth Look at Reminiscence Therapy in Dementia Care