403 East Flournoy Lucas, Shreveport, LA 71115
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Village Health Care At The Glen
Pros
The facility seemed very nice.- Most of the staff were friendly and helpful.
- The room was very spacious.
- The facility looked well-maintained.
- The staff were personable and caring.
- The security guards were personable, knowledgeable, and caring.
Cons
They neglected the uncle and went days without giving him a bath.- The administrative staff were stiff and uncaring.
- They withdrew funds automatically after the uncle’s death and refused to credit it back until the next billing cycle.
- They sent a check to the estate of the uncle instead of to the person who had paid.
- They claimed there was a law preventing the proper credit from being issued.
- They are dirty.
Review
Village Health Care At The Glen in Shreveport is best suited for seniors who prize a warm, community-oriented atmosphere where staff interactions feel personal and attentive, and where the physical environment is comfortable and well-kept. Families that value visible security and a sense of steadiness in daily routines will find the setting aligns with those priorities. The price point is high relative to many peers, so the community makes sense for those who can justify premium care in exchange for perceived attentiveness and a pleasant living space. Reviewers who felt well cared for describe a livable, inviting home with rooms offering space and desirable amenities, contributing to a sense of everyday quality.
Those considering alternatives include families working with tighter budgets or those who insist on consistently rigorous clinical oversight. One strongly negative account underscores the risk of neglect and disputes over billing, which cannot be ignored. Even among favorable remarks, there are hints of variability in staff engagement, with some aides seen as better than others and administrative staff described as stiff or uncaring by a disappointed family member. For families needing highly reliable, transparent financial and care governance, it would be prudent to compare other options in the area and probe for guarantees, predictable schedules, and early warning signs of trouble.
On the upside, multiple reviews praise a friendly, personable staff and helpful security personnel, with residents describing the environment as welcoming and well-maintained. Rooms are noted as spacious, and the facility appears to deliver on promised amenities, translating into a better daily experience for residents who value comfort and independence. The existence of a three-facility system within Glen Retirement enhances the sense that the brand brings resources and continuity, even if each location operates independently. For a senior who wants light-filled common areas, community interaction, and dependable aides, these elements carry real weight.
The most serious concerns arise from the critical review: alleged neglect, delayed care, and a troubling billing episode after a relative’s death. Such accounts highlight potential gaps in oversight, consistency, and financial handling that can erode trust and create administrative headaches for families. While that account is singular, it signals a risk factor that should not be dismissed, particularly for residents with higher care needs or families counting on automatic payment arrangements. The cost factor compounds the stakes, because premium facilities must demonstrate accountability in both clinical performance and financial stewardship to justify the spend.
Practical due diligence is essential. Prospective families should request current staffing ratios, caregiver qualifications, and a clear care plan outlining bath and hygiene routines, mobility assistance, and responsiveness to call bells. Ask for a precise, written billing policy, including how withdrawals are authorized, how refunds are handled, and how estate issues are resolved. Visit at different times to observe response times, talk with multiple staff members, and speak with current residents about consistency. Review recent inspection and accreditation records if available, and request references from families with experiences similar to the intended resident. A robust agreement and a trial period can help align expectations and avoid later surprises.
Bottom line: Village Health Care At The Glen can be a solid fit for families seeking a warm, well-kept, service-driven environment with friendly staff and comfortable living spaces, provided care and financial governance are transparent and consistently managed. If those assurances cannot be secured or if there is significant concern about neglect risk or billing reliability, it is prudent to explore other options in Shreveport that demonstrate stronger, more consistent oversight and fewer red flags. The decision should rest on a clear view of what quality care will entail day-to-day, the reliability of billing practices, and the facility’s ability to deliver urgent care when needed.
126 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Independent Living
Memory Care
Skilled Nursing Facility
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Shreveport Regional (7 miles away)
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies
Comprehensive Guide to VA Nursing Homes: A Crucial Long-Term Care Resource for Veterans
