8622 Line Ave, Shreveport, LA 71106
To contact a resident: (318) 861-2366
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
The Gables at Spring Lake Assisted Living NOT AN ACTIVE ACCOUNT Costs & Pricing
At The Gables at Spring Lake Assisted Living, the monthly cost for a one-bedroom unit is $2,100, which is notably more affordable compared to the average costs in both Caddo Parish and the wider state of Louisiana. In Caddo Parish, similar accommodations typically run about $2,145 per month, while the statewide average escalates significantly to $3,413. This competitive pricing makes The Gables an appealing option for those seeking quality assisted living care in a vibrant community setting.
| Floor plans | The Gables at Spring Lake Assisted Living NOT AN ACTIVE ACCOUNT | Caddo Parish | Louisiana |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $2,100 | $2,145 | $3,413 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of The Gables at Spring Lake Assisted Living NOT AN ACTIVE ACCOUNT
Pros
Shana Graham and Jadaia Richardson provided excellent customer service.
They made first-time visitors feel comfortable and cared for.
They showed kindness and compassion while helping a friend's mother.
Shana and Jadaia went above and beyond and truly made a difference.
The staff were friendly and residents were kind.
The nurses were caring.
Cons
The administrator is ridiculous; nothing gets done when problems are reported.
The housekeeping staff donât clean up anything.
People should remove their loved ones from here.
Review
The Gables at Spring Lake Assisted Living is best suited for families prioritizing warm, hands-on, person-centered care delivered by front-line caregivers who truly engage with residents. This community earns its strength from staff who demonstrate genuine kindness, patience, and a readiness to go above and beyond for individual needs. Prospective residents who value friendly interactions, meaningful daily contact with nurses and aides, and a social, welcoming atmosphere will find the most payoff here. This is a setting where relationships with caregivers often feel personal, and where families can feel reassured by visible care in day-to-day moments.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are safety-minded families who cannot tolerate uneven administrative responsiveness or inconsistent housekeeping. A handful of reviewers flag concerns about management accountability and upkeep, and those issues can become meaningful friction when a loved one relies on timely problem resolution and a consistently clean environment. If reliable administrative communication, rapid issue escalation, and meticulous housekeeping are nonnegotiables, it makes sense to compare other options or to press for concrete assurances from leadership before moving forward.
On the plus side, the standout pros are compelling. The staff, particularly the hands-on caregivers, nurses, and the named representatives, Shana Graham and Jadaia Richardson, are repeatedly praised for their courtesy, competence, and willingness to make families feel seen and supported. Reviews describe an environment where staff kindness permeates the resident experience, contributing to a sense of comfort and belonging for both residents and visiting family members. The facility spirit comes across as friendly and welcoming, with residents who appear engaged and connected to the community, which often translates into fewer days marked by isolation or disengagement.
The principal drawbacks center on management and housekeeping, as highlighted by a solitary, negative account. Critics of administrative responsiveness report that requests and problems may not be addressed promptly, which can erode confidence for families entrusting someone with essential daily needs. In addition, housekeeping concerns, whether about cleaning thoroughness or consistency, raise questions about daily and long-term upkeep. While this single negative review sits against a backdrop of broad praise, it is a meaningful signal that practical operations deserve direct confirmation during a visit. The risk is that unresolved issues could dampen the very strengths that make the community appealing.
How the positives weigh against the negatives depends on what families prioritize. The warmth of frontline caregivers and the visible dedication of nursing staff can offset occasional administrative friction for many residents, delivering daily reassurance and a sense of safety. However, for families where timely problem resolution and spotless housekeeping are nonnegotiable, these cons warrant careful vetting before committing. The key is to test the system: observe how quickly staff respond to routine questions, request a meet-and-greet with the administrator, and inspect housekeeping routines in real time. Seek specifics on escalation paths, response times, and any recent improvements to demonstrate that the leadership is actively addressing gaps.
For practical due diligence, schedule a comprehensive tour with questions tailored to care needs. Ask to meet multiple caregivers and the director, and request to speak with current families about their experiences with issue resolution. Check how activity planning is run, meal quality, and safety protocols from a residentâs daily perspective. Inquire about staffing ratios during peak hours and night shifts, and request a clear outline of housekeeping schedules and quality checks. If the goal is a community where compassion is palpable and staff advocacy is visible, The Gables at Spring Lake delivers on that front. If administrative clarity and meticulous housekeeping are nonnegotiables, use the tour as a litmus test and prepare to compare with alternatives before deciding.

























Is Assisted Living Deductible on Your Taxes? Understanding the Complexities of Assisted Living Expenses and Deductions
Assisted Living Support for Veterans: A Complete and Detailed Overview
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing


