11313 Bold Forbes Rd, Louisville, KY 40272
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Woods of Glen Hill Manor offers competitive pricing for its accommodations compared to broader market rates in Jefferson County and throughout Kentucky. For a two-bedroom unit, residents can expect to pay just $523 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,544 and the state average of $3,702. This represents a substantial cost saving, making it an attractive option for those seeking multi-bedroom living arrangements. When considering private room options, Woods of Glen Hill Manor charges $3,850 monthly. While this is higher than the county's average of $5,115 and close to the state average of $4,260, it reflects a focus on quality and personalized care that may justify the investment for many individuals. Overall, Woods of Glen Hill Manor provides appealing financial choices tailored to meet different living needs while prioritizing comfort and community.
| Floor plans | Woods of Glen Hill Manor | Jefferson County | Kentucky |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Bedrooms | $523 | $3,544 | $3,702 |
| Private | $3,850 | $5,115 | $4,260 |
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
The collection of impressions about this apartment complex presents a striking split in experiences, with one side consistently praising the on-site leadership and another side sounding alarms about health, safety, and reliability. On the positive end, several residents foreground a particularly strong and helpful presence at the property: the Apartment Manager is described as "super awesome," always ready to help, and blessed with a friendly demeanor. Reportedly, she is "so sweet and nice" and runs the operation with noticeable efficiency. To these reviewers, her responsiveness and attitude stand out as a bright spot in the living experience, enough to elevate the overall impression of the place.
Support for the manager's leadership extends beyond her personal warmth. Reviewers frequently call her "the Bomb" and emphasize that she embodies the best of what the complex has to offer. It's not just a matter of courtesy; these residents feel she genuinely keeps things moving and makes an effort to address resident needs. Alongside her, the maintenance team also earns praise. The maintenance person is described as friendly and well-intentioned, someone who really tries to get everything done within a reasonable time frame. In those accounts, the combination of a proactive manager and a conscientious maintenance crew provides a level of service that many residents appreciate and rely on.
The most enthusiastic notes about the property place the manager at the center of a positive experience. Several reviewers mention not only her personal character but also the efficiency with which she handles tasks, which contributes to a smoother day-to-day life for tenants. The sentiment is that, when problems arise, there is someone capable on the ground who can respond, coordinate, and keep things moving. In these accounts, the complex feels well-managed, and residents feel supported by leadership that seems to genuinely care about residents' satisfaction.
But beneath this favorable portrait lies a much more troubling counter-narrative. A separate, strongly negative review paints the opposite reality in very stark terms. This resident describes the complex as the worst they have ever lived in, citing black mold and a constantly leaking air conditioner. They allege a deliberate cover-up, claiming management wants tenants to accept the problems rather than fix them properly. The account goes further to say that even when maintenance is involved, the response can be unsatisfactory or financially punitive, with the suggestion that some maintenance work comes with unexpected charges rather than real fixes.
Health and safety figures prominently in the dire assessment. The reviewer warns others to "stay away if you want to have good health," alleging that not all mold is treated as dangerous, which feeds a sense of risk and distrust. The office's hours and accessibility are also criticized, described as never being open when needed, which compounds the frustration and leaves residents feeling unsupported in urgent situations. The sense of being sidelined by a management team that should be safeguarding residents' well-being is a central theme of this perspective.
The negative narrative doesn't stop at health concerns. It expands into a broader sense of insecurity within the property: claims that people are allowed into apartments while residents are away at work, followed by allegations of theft or property loss that are not acknowledged or taken seriously by management. There is also harsh language about the quality of the labor hired for repairs, with phrases suggesting that workers are recruited from disreputable sources. The overall atmosphere, according to this review, includes frequent police presence, loud neighbors, and drug activity nearby, which together create a sense of ongoing disturbance and danger.
Taken as a whole, the reviews reveal a complex property where a charismatic, responsive manager and a cooperative maintenance team can deliver a positive, efficient living experience for some residents. For others, however, the same complex becomes a place of serious concern: health risks from mold and leaks, a perceived reluctance or inability to fix problems, questions about who is doing repairs and under what standards, and a sense of insecurity from neighborhood disturbances and theft. The juxtaposition is stark, illustrating how a single property can nurture both highly favorable impressions and severe, even alarming, criticisms depending on who you ask and which experiences dominate their days. For anyone considering living there, the takeaway is clear: the on-site leadership may be a strong asset, but health, safety, and reliability concerns raised by other tenants warrant careful consideration and direct, detailed conversations with management to understand how such issues are currently being addressed.
Woods of Glen Hill Manor in Louisville, KY is a peaceful assisted living community nestled in the beautiful neighborhood of Glen Hill Manor. Located close to nature, residents can enjoy the serene surroundings and take leisurely strolls through nearby parks, breathing in the fresh air and connecting with nature.
The community is committed to providing exceptional care and support for its residents' physical and emotional well-being. With four physicians located nearby, residents have easy access to medical professionals who can provide personalized healthcare services. Additionally, there is a hospital nearby for any emergency medical needs.
Residents of Woods of Glen Hill Manor also have several dining options available to them, with three restaurants conveniently located nearby. Whether they prefer a casual meal or a fine dining experience, residents can satisfy their culinary cravings without having to travel far from home.
Spiritual well-being is also taken care of at this assisted living community, as there is a place of worship located nearby where residents can participate in religious services and connect with their faith.
With its ideal location and easy access to parks, physicians, restaurants, places of worship, and hospitals, Woods of Glen Hill Manor offers a convenient and enriching lifestyle for its residents.
Woods of Glen Hill Manor offers competitive pricing for its accommodations compared to broader market rates in Jefferson County and throughout Kentucky. For a two-bedroom unit, residents can expect to pay just $523 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,544 and the state average of $3,702. This represents a substantial cost saving, making it an attractive option for those seeking multi-bedroom living arrangements. When considering private room options, Woods of Glen Hill Manor charges $3,850 monthly. While this is higher than the county's average of $5,115 and close to the state average of $4,260, it reflects a focus on quality and personalized care that may justify the investment for many individuals. Overall, Woods of Glen Hill Manor provides appealing financial choices tailored to meet different living needs while prioritizing comfort and community.
Woods of Glen Hill Manor is located at 11313 Bold Forbes Rd, Louisville, KY 40272 in Jefferson County, Kentucky
Yes, Woods of Glen Hill Manor allows dogs.
8 Essential Assistive Devices for Older Adults
The article highlights eight essential assistive devices that improve the independence and safety of older adults, addressing issues related to mobility, balance, vision, hearing, and dexterity. It emphasizes the importance of proper selection guided by healthcare professionals to enhance seniors' quality of life while allowing them to age in place.
Navigating the Financial Road to Nursing Home Care: In-Depth Guidance and Resources
The article offers detailed guidance on the financial complexities of nursing home care, covering costs, payment methods, and alternative funding strategies while emphasizing the importance of proactive planning and legal considerations for individuals and families making care decisions.
Supportive Employee Benefits That Help Caregivers Attain Better Work-Life Harmony
The article emphasizes the critical role of supportive employee benefits for caregivers, advocating for flexible scheduling, paid leave, and mental health services to ease their challenges while enhancing employee well-being and organizational loyalty. It also highlights the importance of strong leadership in promoting these initiatives to foster a sustainable workplace culture that values caregivers.