Mallard Pointe Costs & Pricing
Mallard Pointe offers competitively priced accommodations that stand out significantly against the average costs in Ada County and across Idaho. For instance, a studio apartment at Mallard Pointe is available for just $515 per month, a striking contrast to the county's average of $3,387 and the state average of $3,213. Similarly, one-bedroom units are priced at $545 compared to the averages of $3,691 in Ada County and $3,774 statewide. Even for two-bedroom apartments, Mallard Pointe remains an attractive option at $675, well below the county's average of $3,628 and only slightly higher than Idaho's state average of $3,599. This pricing highlights Mallard Pointe as a financially appealing choice for individuals and families seeking quality housing without straining their budgets.
| Floor plans | Mallard Pointe | Ada County | Idaho |
|---|
| Studio | $515 | $3,387 | $3,213 |
| 1 Bedroom | $545 | $3,691 | $3,774 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $675 | $3,628 | $3,599 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$60 / mo
Olive Grove Apartments
$575 to $675 / month
3.5 miles away
-
from +$79 / mo
Vineyard Suites at Indian Creek
$594 / month
19.6 miles away
-
from +$92 / mo
Sagewood Senior Apartments
$607 to $4,560 / month
18.9 miles away
-
from +$45 / mo
Settlers Creek Apartments
$560 to $4,464 / month
1.4 miles away
-
from +$80 / mo
Siggy
$595 / month
3.6 miles away
Overall Review of Mallard Pointe
differentiator
7 reviews mention this
Greenbelt and river views
The Greenbelt and Boise River location is the most consistent positive in residents’ comments.
Multiple residents highlight the setting—walking out near the Greenbelt and having the Boise River close enough to feel like it is part of daily life. Several also mention apartments with views of the Greenbelt and river. Even residents who are unhappy overall still call the area beautiful, even if they feel maintenance falls short.
common
4 reviews mention this
Helpful maintenance crew
Residents frequently praise the maintenance team for being responsive and courteous.
Several reviews specifically call out the maintenance crew as helpful—getting work orders handled quickly and showing up when needed. Residents also describe maintenance as courteous, and one person thanks staff for addressing issues promptly. A common thread is that day-to-day requests tend to get real effort, even when other parts of the experience are mixed.
caveat
5 reviews mention this
Repairs and upkeep concerns
Residents also describe ongoing repairs and upkeep that don’t always keep up.
Some residents report ceilings needing repairs that seem to linger, along with a general sense that maintenance inside the units is inconsistent. Others describe periods with ongoing problems, dirty carpets, and the feeling that repairs are not completed in a timely way. There are also reviews pointing to building wear and disruption, which adds to the negative experience for those reviewers.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Deposit and management responsiveness
Some residents say property management doesn’t respond quickly to deposit and move-out issues.
At least a couple of reviews focus on move-out follow-through, especially delays with deposit timelines and difficulty getting answers. One resident describes waiting for a refund and getting pushed to another phone contact without a callback. Another reports a situation where the deposit was not returned and expresses frustration with how the process was handled.
common
6 reviews mention this
Friendly staff, when it works
Many residents describe staff as positive, friendly, and willing to help.
Several reviews mention an upbeat attitude from office staff and the feeling that people are helpful when questions or needs come up. Residents thank staff directly and describe management as good, with helpful follow-through that makes day-to-day life easier. That said, there are also unhappy reviews about management behavior and professionalism, showing the experience is not uniform across residents.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Senior living expectations don’t match
Some residents say the community doesn’t feel like senior-focused housing and lacks care supports.
Two reviews describe a mismatch with what they expected from senior living, including comments that the building includes younger disabled tenants. Those reviewers also say they did not see care services or regular activities beyond occasional events. Even for residents who enjoy the setting, these comments reflect disappointment in the level of structured support they expected to find.
common
2 reviews mention this
Affordability versus value
Residents discuss affordability, though value assessments vary by person.
Some reviews describe the community as low-income housing and note it as relatively affordable for the Boise area. Others agree it is a HUD property but still feel the rent was high for the quality they experienced. Taken together with the maintenance comments, it suggests affordability is part of the appeal, but not everyone feels the upkeep matches what they paid.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.
Active Adult Communities (55+)
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Boise Air Terminal (6 miles away)
Friendly staff in a close-knit, activity-rich small community.
Compassionate Conversations: How to Comfort Someone Who Is Grieving
Home Health Care Aides: Understanding Their Role and Supporting Your Family
Urinary Tract Infections in Older Adults: Comprehensive Insights on Symptoms, Treatment, and Prevention