2820 Hunters Loop, Blackfoot, ID 83221
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Gables Of Blackfoot Assisted Living II Costs & Pricing
Gables of Blackfoot Assisted Living II offers a competitive monthly rate for its studio accommodations, priced at $3,000. When compared to the average costs within Bingham County and the broader state of Idaho, which stand at $2,753 and $3,213 respectively, Gables positions itself slightly above the county average but aligns closely with the state figure. This pricing reflects the community's commitment to providing quality care and enriching living environments for its residents, while still remaining relatively affordable in comparison to other assisted living options available in the area.
| Floor plans | Gables Of Blackfoot Assisted Living II | Bingham County | Idaho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $3,000 | $2,753 | $3,213 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Gables Of Blackfoot Assisted Living II
Pros
The staff at Blackfoot Gables are kind and helpful.
The food is very good and the rooms are spacious and homey.
The Gables has a home-like atmosphere and delivers excellent, personalized care.
The administrator Heidi Olsen is an LPN, which elevates the quality of care.
The Gables in Blackfoot is a beautiful, clean facility with a welcoming environment.
The staff are consistently friendly and provide excellent care to residents.
The Gables takes residents on field trips and provides laundry service.
The smaller size of the facility helps ensure residents receive attentive, readily available care.
Cons
The price is hard for people to afford.
It was not cost efficient for their loved ones' needs.
They were a little bit too nonchalant and almost indifferent to her needs.
She didnāt care for the food.
She was never included.
Review
The Gables of Blackfoot Assisted Living II is best suited for families seeking a small, intimate, hands-on care environment in Blackfoot where staff accessibility and a home-like atmosphere matter most. This community shines for seniors who prioritize personal attention, friendly interactions with caregivers, and a setting that feels less institutional than larger campuses. It works well for residents who enjoy light social programming, routine outings, and practical services (like laundry) delivered with a personal touch. The newer building and clean, welcoming ambiance reinforce a sense of comfort that many families want when choosing care for a loved one. Those who envision highly specialized medical routines or intense, hospital-level needs may find the fit less ideal.
Certain families should consider alternatives. If price is a primary constraint, the affordability question looms large here, even when care feels superior day-to-day. Respite stays highlighted a cautionary note: a respite experience can feel insufficiently attentive, with meals and individualized attention not always meeting expectations. For those seeking a more robust, highly structured activity calendar or stronger inclusion in daily programs, this setting may feel predictable rather than expansive. Additionally, for residents needing more advanced medical oversight or specialized dementia care, itās prudent to compare options that promise deeper clinical support or a larger care team.
The strongest advantages lie in the staff and the atmosphere. Reviews consistently praise kindness, helpfulness, and genuine care from the team, with the administratorās LPN background cited as a meaningful asset that elevates daily care. A home-like atmosphere, small size, and high cleanliness contribute to a sense of comfort and safety, with staff accessibility described as a standout benefit. Residentsā rooms are noted as spacious and the community as clean and welcoming. Residents benefit from regular outings, field trips, and practical amenities like laundering services, all of which reinforce a practical, unobtrusive quality of life that families often seek in assisted living. These positives create a tangible offset to the expense for families prioritizing personal connection and consistent attention.
Yet, the cons cannot be dismissed. Cost remains the most consistently cited hurdle, with several reviewers signaling that the price can outpace perceived value for certain needs. Some residents found the furnished spaces adequate but not particularly premium, and one respite stay described care as less attentive than hoped. Meal quality and dining experiences varied, with at least one resident expressing dissatisfaction with food, underscoring that dietary preferences and taste play a real role in overall satisfaction. While the building supports activities on a schedule, a few reviews note limited inclusion in programs, suggesting that engagement may depend on individual staff interactions rather than a uniformly proactive activities team. The small size, while advantageous in some respects, may also constrain program breadth and specialized services.
Pros significantly offset cons when core priorities align with what the Gables delivers. For families who value highly visible caregiver engagement, a warm, home-like environment, and practical daily services, the care model here offers meaningful daily benefits that can justify a higher price. The presence of a capable administrator with clinical background provides reassurance about ongoing medical attention, and the intimate setting often means residents receive quicker, more personalized responses. The combination of cleanliness, pleasant atmosphere, and reliable routines creates a quiet confidence: this is a place where staff know residents well, and small issues are often addressed promptly. In short, for the right fit, prioritizing human connection, routine, and a comfortable home feel, the pros substantially outweigh the cons.
For families evaluating this community, approach the decision with clear criteria: confirm current pricing and what is included in monthly rates; probe the dining program to ensure it accommodates dietary preferences and taste; ask how activities are scheduled and whether residents are included in planning or at least have consistent opportunities to participate; review how respite care is staffed and how attentiveness is ensured during shorter stays; and verify the level of medical oversight, especially for residents with evolving needs. If price sensitivity is high, or if a broader activity slate, stronger dietary customization, or higher-level medical support is non-negotiable, it is prudent to compare with other local options. The Gables of Blackfoot Assisted Living II should be on the short list for families who prioritize warmth, attentiveness, and a genuine home ambiance, while those seeking sharper cost efficiency or more expansive programming may want to cast a wider net.
































Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes







