3703 North 55th Street, Tampa, FL 33619
To contact a resident: (813) 381-9726
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Veldorsey's AFCH Costs & Pricing
Veldorsey's Assisted Facility for Care and Housing (AFCH) offers competitive pricing compared to both Hillsborough County and the broader state of Florida. For a semi-private room, Veldorsey's monthly fee is $800, significantly lower than the county average of $3,096 and the state average of $3,009. Similarly, their private rooms are priced at $1,600, which presents a substantial savings when juxtaposed against Hillsborough County's average of $3,384 and Florida's state average of $3,699. These cost advantages highlight Veldorsey's commitment to providing quality care at an accessible price point, making it an appealing option for families seeking affordable assisted living solutions.
| Floor plans | Veldorsey's AFCH | Hillsborough County | Florida |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $800 | $3,096 | $3,009 |
| Private | $1,600 | $3,384 | $3,699 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Veldorsey's AFCH
Pros
They provided excellent customer service.
They were friendly, quick, and concise on the phone.
They were very nice people.
They answered the phone.
They clearly explained what was needed to retrieve the car.
They helped get the car onto the trailer.
Cons
The business is described as extremely shady and in need of shutdown.
It is accused of overcharging with excessive daily storage and tow fees.
Employees are said to curse at customers and behave unprofessionally.
The company allegedly holds vehicles and personal property for extended periods and refuses access to retrieve them.
It is claimed to use questionable tactics, including selling cars, placing liens, and demanding cash payments only.
The overall impression from reviews is that the operation is dirty, sketchy, and resembles a con artist enterprise.
Review
This community is clearly not aimed at families seeking reliable, professional senior care with transparent operations. The most appropriate readers for this option are those who can tolerate irregular business practices, inconsistent communication, and a willingness to navigate frequent questions about pricing and policy enforcement. In practical terms, it is a fit only for households that are prepared to accept ambiguity around charges, access, and staff conduct as a baseline condition of care.
Alternatives should be strongly considered by any family prioritizing ethical billing, dependable staffing, and proactive problem resolution. The clear signal from the available feedback is that transparency, courtesy, and timely service are not consistently present here. If a plan emphasizes predictable monthly costs, straightforward access to belongings, respectful treatment from front-desk staff, and reliable, documented policies, then other communities in the Tampa area deserve serious attention. This option raises enough red flags, especially around overcharging and obstructive practices, that it warrants a default stance toward shopping elsewhere for respite or long-term placement.
On balance, the few positive mentions do not counterbalance the dominant concerns. A handful of reviewers describe courteous cadence on a call or decent quickness in isolated moments, but these instances are sporadic and do little to counter a pattern of alleged malfeasance and poor interpersonal dynamics. The recurring themes across reviews highlight excessive daily charges, opaque fee structures, and resistance when attempting to retrieve personal property or request basic information. When cost integrity and straightforward access collide with these experiences, the pro side falls dramatically short of what families rely on in a trusted care partner.
The main pros, politeness in isolated interactions or occasional fast responses, are overwhelmed by persistent cons: allegations of overpricing, aggressive or evasive staff behavior, and practices that undermine a familyâs ability to manage care and finances with confidence. In a settings U-turned toward caregiving, the absence of consistent professionalism is not a minor nuisance but a core risk. This gap elevates the importance of choosing a partner where billing is transparent, disputes are resolveable, and documentation is easy to obtain. Unfortunately, the reviews suggest this community struggles to meet those basics on a regular basis.
From a decision-making standpoint, several concrete steps separate prudent choices from regrettable ones. First, demand written, itemized cost sheets with no ambiguous language and a clear dispute resolution process. Second, verify licensing status, inspection histories, and any pending enforcement actions with state authorities. Third, require access to a sample care plan, dietary and activity schedules, and a clearly stated caregiver-to-resident ratio, plus a policy that guarantees timely release of belongings and records. Fourth, tour multiple times at different times of day, asking current residents and families about consistency of service and responsiveness. Finally, compare overall value, not just sticker price, with other Tampa-area communities that boast higher ratings and more robust governance.
In the end, families that need dependable, ethical, and transparent senior care should look elsewhere. This option, based on the weight of reported experiences, presents too many systemic concerns to be considered a low-risk choice. The prudent path is to narrow to communities with verifiable pricing transparency, consistent staffing, and a track record of respectful, prompt service. When evaluating candidates, prioritize those that offer clear contracts, proactive communication, and a demonstrated commitment to residentsâ dignity and safety.










Urinary Tract Infections in Older Adults: Comprehensive Insights on Symptoms, Treatment, and Prevention
California's Form 602A: An In-Depth Examination of Senior Care Assessment
Comprehensive Look at Senior Blood Pressure Charts: Normal and Elevated Levels by Age