Mulberry Gardens of Southington Costs & Pricing
Mulberry Gardens of Southington offers competitive pricing for its residents compared to both New Haven County and the broader state of Connecticut. For a studio apartment, Mulberry Gardens charges $4,200 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $6,890 and the state average of $5,919. The one-bedroom option at Mulberry is priced at $5,500, which remains more affordable than New Haven County's rate of $6,325 and slightly less than the state's rate of $6,383. Even in the semi-private setting, where costs are set at $5,595, Mulberry maintains its value proposition by being below the county's average of $5,988 and slightly above the statewide average of $5,829. These pricing strategies underscore Mulberry Gardens' commitment to providing quality care at accessible rates for families seeking exceptional living options for their loved ones.
| Floor plans | Mulberry Gardens of Southington | New Haven County | Connecticut |
|---|
| Studio | $4,200 | $6,890 | $5,919 |
| 1 Bedroom | $5,500 | $6,325 | $6,383 |
| Semi-Private | $5,595 | $5,988 | $5,829 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$167 / mo
Pomperaug Woods a CCRC
$4,033 to $7,500 / month
17.9 miles away
-
from -$180 / mo
Brandywine Living At Litchfield
$4,020 to $7,440 / month
19.9 miles away
-
from +$650 / mo
KindCare at Bristol
$4,850 to $6,250 / month
7.7 miles away
-
About the same
Chatham Place at Mary Wade
$4,250 to $5,250 / month
17.4 miles away
-
from +$300 / mo
Spring Village Stratford
$4,500 to $8,000 / month
25.0 miles away
Overall Review of Mulberry Gardens of Southington
differentiator
4 reviews mention this
Pricing feels notably more affordable
Pricing is described as more affordable than expected for the care provided.
Multiple reviewers said they chose Mulberry Gardens because it was affordable or offered good value. One reviewer compared it directly to another place they looked at and said it was about half the price. This lines up with the published price ranges showing units priced well below county and state benchmarks. Reviews also suggest families felt they were getting enough day-to-day support for the cost, even when some care and meal details needed improvement.
common
18 reviews mention this
Staff attentiveness and helpfulness
Residents and families repeatedly describe staff as attentive and helpful.
Across reviews, families highlight staff who are polite, caring, and responsive to day-to-day needs. Several note that the staff knows residents by name and works hard to assist with personal care and prompts. Even when a reviewer felt areas of care needed more quantity, they still characterized the staff as caring and willing to help. The emphasis on communication and follow-through also shows up in how people describe staying informed about health needs.
common
10 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Daily programming and outings are a consistent part of life here.
Residents and families describe a steady schedule of activities, including exercise, arts and crafts, games, bingo, and social events like ice cream socials. Several also mention taking residents out for walks, trips, and outings, including religious services and seasonal events. Reviewers further connect the programming to residents becoming more social and participating more readily over time. This matches the communityâs focus on scheduled activities and community-sponsored events.
common
6 reviews mention this
Food is generally praised, with gaps
Food is often praised, but some say meal choices and diet support need work.
Many reviewers say the food is fine to excellent and that residents enjoy meals, including in the memory care setting. At the same time, at least a few people flag gaps: one wants more attention to food offerings for diabetes, and another says there could be better meal choices. Others describe dietary needs and the importance of special dietary restrictions, which helps explain why food quality alone doesnât address everything. Overall, reviews suggest dining is a strength, but dietary support and variety are areas to watch.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Memory care is available, but courtyard access
Memory care support exists, but reviewers raise concerns about access to outdoor space.
Multiple reviewers mention the memory care or Alzheimerâs-specific areas and describe meaningful engagement for residents there. One reviewer described improvements in a loved oneâs social behavior after moving into memory care, while another highlighted a dedicated memory care setting. However, at least one review specifically questions the memory care staffing quantity and also calls out the need for an enclosed outdoor courtyard for those residents. That combination suggests families may want to confirm how outdoor access and staffing are handled for memory care.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Tour experience includes parking issues
Some visitors report problems with parking during scheduled events.
Two reviews describe a negative tour or talk experience tied to parkingâboth say there was no parking available when they arrived. In those accounts, the visitor said the situation wasnât resolved with an obvious backup plan, and they were dissatisfied with how it was handled. While the same community is described elsewhere as welcoming during visits, these reviews suggest parking logistics can affect first impressions on event days. If youâre planning a scheduled visit, it may be worth confirming parking options ahead of time.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.