9822 Cody Way, Stockton, CA 95209
To contact a resident: (510) 825-8814
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Lazarus Care Costs & Pricing
Lazarus Care offers competitive pricing for its services in comparison to both San Joaquin County and the broader California market. For a semi-private room, Lazarus Care charges $1,500 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,074 and the state average of $3,333. Similarly, for private rooms, Lazarus Care's monthly fee of $2,500 stands in stark contrast to the county's rate of $3,364 and California's statewide average of $3,939. These cost advantages not only highlight Lazarus Care's commitment to providing affordable options for residents but also reflect their dedication to accessibility in long-term care services.
| Floor plans | Lazarus Care | San Joaquin County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,500 | $3,074 | $3,333 |
| Private | $2,500 | $3,364 | $3,939 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Lazarus Care
Pros
The staff were very friendly and patient with questions.
The staff showed kindness and patience toward guests asking questions.
Cons
The all-male house prevented the reviewer’s mother from visiting.
The all-male environment prevented the reviewer’s mother from going there.
Review
Lazarus Care in Stockton is best suited for senior men who need assisted living and want a straightforward, resident-focused environment where staff are consistently friendly and willing to spend time answering questions. The defining feature is an all-male house, which creates a predictable, single-gender setting that can be reassuring for families seeking a practical, uncomplicated living arrangement for a male loved one. For men who value staff accessibility and clear communication, this community stands out as a solid fit.
That same gender reality means explicit limits for others. Families with a female loved one should look elsewhere or seek out options within Lazarus Care that accommodate women, whether in different houses or through other local providers. The reviews indicate a real mismatch for women, so any decision should weigh the gender structure as a hard constraint rather than a negotiable preference.
On the upside, the notable strength lies in staff behavior. Reviewers repeatedly describe the team as friendly and patient with questions, which translates into less friction during transitions, better trust, and smoother day-to-day interactions. In an assisted-living setting, such communication quality is not a cosmetic perk but a core contributor to ongoing satisfaction, helping families feel heard and residents feel respected. This genuine responsiveness can offset some uncertainties that come with choosing a new home.
Yet the all-male environment cannot be overlooked as a fundamental limitation that the positive staff dynamic cannot fully counterbalance. For female residents or families prioritizing gender-inclusive housing, this is a decisive drawback. For male residents, the warmth and attentiveness of the caregivers are meaningful offsets that improve daily life, but there remains a need to confirm other basics, care level specifics, safety practices, and the quality of routines and activities, since the reviews do not provide detail in these areas.
The data available comes from two reviews, both awarding four stars, which suggests a generally favorable impression but with a very small sample. That modest basis means a cautious approach: visit in person, observe how staff interact with residents, and ask pointed questions about day-to-day life, such as meal quality, activity options, and response times. It’s essential to verify whether the male-only format is a fixed policy or something that can be navigated with alternative floor plans or sister facilities nearby.
Bottom line: Lazarus Care delivers a credible, compassionate environment for male seniors seeking assisted living, with staff engagement and communication standing out as a tangible strength. For families with a female loved one or anyone prioritizing gender diversity in housing, this community should not be the first choice and alternatives should be pursued without hesitation. For those whose priority is a responsive, approachable staff and a straightforward living arrangement for a male resident, a structured tour and candid conversations with leadership will reveal whether the fit is right. If the gender constraint aligns with the resident’s needs, this can be a reliable, steady option; if not, move promptly to alternatives that better match familial priorities and resident comfort.













Urinary Tract Infections in Older Adults: Comprehensive Insights on Symptoms, Treatment, and Prevention
California's Form 602A: An In-Depth Examination of Senior Care Assessment
Comprehensive Look at Senior Blood Pressure Charts: Normal and Elevated Levels by Age