1139 Dwyer Avenue, San Jose, CA 95120
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Bonhomie I Costs & Pricing
Bonhomie I offers competitive pricing for its residential services, particularly when compared to the broader market in Santa Clara County and across California. For a semi-private room, residents can expect to pay $5,000 per month, which is notably higher than the county average of $3,943 and the state average of $3,333. In terms of private accommodations, Bonhomie I's monthly rate stands at $6,000, also exceeding both the county's average of $4,096 and California's statewide average of $3,939. These costs reflect Bonhomie I's commitment to providing high-quality care and amenities that may justify the premium over regional averages.
| Floor plans | Bonhomie I | Santa Clara County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $5,000 | $3,943 | $3,333 |
| Private | $6,000 | $4,096 | $3,939 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$150 / mo
Alexandria Victoria
$4,850 / month18.1 miles away -
from -$355 / mo
Loma Clara Senior Living
$4,645 to $6,895 / month14.4 miles away -
from +$395 / mo
Merrill Gardens At Campbell
$5,395 to $9,295 / month6.2 miles away -
from -$530 / mo
Aegis of Fremont
$4,470 to $6,420 / month23.2 miles away -
from -$500 / mo
Kingdom Hearts Care Home
$4,500 to $5,000 / month6.7 miles away
Overall Review of Bonhomie I
Pros
They are clean.- The staff is very friendly and they try very hard.
- The landscaping is very nice, with a nice front yard and backyard.
- They have a senior center across the street, which is a major plus.
- The food seems good and it always smells good.
Cons
Their walls could use a coat of paint, maybe something less earthy.- Communication can be difficult because a lot of them have a heavy accent.
- They thought there were some things included, that aren't, like diapers.
- Her biggest complaint is that she is tired of watching t.v.; maybe more outdoor time would be nice.
Review
Bonhomie I in San Jose is best suited for families seeking a clean, approachable senior living option that offers real social spark and practical accessibility to activities beyond the walls. This community fits well for residents who appreciate a friendly, trying-hard staff and a campus that looks well kept, with attractive landscaping and a welcoming front and back area. The strongest appeal is the immediate social ecosystem: a senior center across the street that staff are willing to use as a conduit for outings and group events. For seniors who want a place with warmth, a manageable footprint, and a straightforward way to stay engaged through nearby resources, Bonhomie I checks those boxes.
Key advantages are the basics done well: cleanliness and maintenance are solid; the grounds are pleasant, with a front yard and backyard that feel welcoming. The staff is described as friendly and clearly trying hard, which translates into a respectful daily experience for residents who benefit from consistent, approachable caregivers. The proximity to the senior center across the street is not just handy; it enables scheduled trips and social activities that would otherwise require planning. The aroma of the meals signals that the kitchen is turning out something tasty, supporting appetite and enjoyment at mealtimes. These positives create a lived-in sense of home that can be hard to find in other smaller options.
Several practical drawbacks temper the appeal. First, the interior aesthetics show wear: walls could use a fresh coat of paint and a lighter, brighter palette than the earthy tones currently used. While maintenance is functional, the appearance matters for comfort and pride of place. Communication presents a real hurdle for some residents: a number of staff members speak with heavy accents, which can impede clear exchanges about care and daily routines. Another budgetary caveat is the gap between expectations and reality where certain items, such as diapers, are not included in the territory of services; families must verify what is covered and what requires extra payment. Finally, a resident’s comment about being tired of watching television highlights a deeper issue: the desire for more outdoor time and stimulating activities to balance screen use and sedentary days.
These positives offset the drawbacks in several practical ways. The friendliness of staff helps smooth out communication gaps, watchers can still rely on consistent, patient support even when language nuance complicates dialogue. The senior-center access is a meaningful hedge against boredom, providing structured opportunities for engagement without carving out a burdensome plan. The pleased sense of smell from meals hints at quality kitchen practices that can translate into regular, satisfying dining experiences. The overall package, then, rewards families who can align expectations with a realistic activity calendar and an offered social pipeline, while also pushing for a concrete outdoor activity plan to satisfy the resident craving for outdoor time.
Families who prioritize picture-perfect interior design or a multilingual front-line staff may want to explore alternatives. If clear communication without translation friction is essential, or if cost predictability matters because missing inclusions can strain budgets, another community could be a better fit. Also, residents who crave more vigorous outdoor programming or who dislike the earthy interiors should compare calendars, visit during peak activity hours, and assess whether the environment aligns with daily preferences and energy levels. This is not a discount option; it is a pragmatic choice for those who want reliable care with a warm, local touch, balanced by the need to verify all inclusions and activity levels.
Bottom line: Bonhomie I offers a solid, home-like option for seniors who want a friendly, tidy setting, tangible social options via a nearby senior center, and a kitchen that smells promising. The key decision hinges on valuing easy access to local programming and a welcoming staff while being prepared to navigate a few maintenance quirks, potential language barriers, and some missing inclusions. Pros outweigh cons for a resident who prizes warmth and social proximity over pristine interiors or guaranteed all-inclusive pricing. Prospective families should schedule a tour focused on staff communication, ask for detailed breakdowns of included services, and request a sample activity schedule to confirm the pace and variety of outdoor and social opportunities.
6 resident community capacity
1-bedroom apartments
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Activities off-site
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services on-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
San Jose International (10 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide