1001 Hemlock Avenue, Millbrae, CA 94030
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Millbrae Assisted Living Center
Pros
The staff were very helpful in assisting his walking recovery through daily physical therapy. - His stay was pleasant and supportive given his serious injury.
- Monica Rani is intelligent, humble, and caring, and goes out of her way to fulfill patients' requests.
- The nursing staff provided patient, thorough care and ensured he had everything he needed.
- The staff cared for her mother at a high level, with warmth and compassion.
- The facility provides individualized care and attention, with friendly and positive staff.
Cons
The facility is one of the worst care facilities in the state, maybe in the world. - It is absolutely disgusting, with sticky floors and a smell like poop.
- The nurses and CNAs don’t care for patients and neglect them.
- CNAs do not pass water to patients, causing dehydration and failing to change briefs due to staff shortages.
- The staff are overworked, lack breaks, and patients are unattended.
- The building is not kept up to date and the facility is overall gross.
- There are persistent signs of neglect and unattended patients, raising safety concerns.
- The place should be shut down immediately.
- The nurses are awful and don’t care about the patients.
- People are advised not to place loved ones there, as the facility is severely neglected.
Review
Millbrae Assisted Living Center is best suited for families seeking short-term rehabilitation where daily physical therapy can drive tangible gains and where an advocate can monitor care closely. The strongest value appears in rehab-focused stays, with the potential for meaningful improvement when therapy teams are engaged and responsive. For residents needing steady, long-term daily care, a consistently clean environment, and predictable supervision, this community is fragile and risky as a long-term home.
Careful consideration is warranted for anyone prioritizing safety and reliability. Across numerous accounts, concerns about understaffing, inconsistent supervision, and neglect emerged as critical risks. Reviewers describe dirty conditions, dehydration episodes, and missed care tasks, with repeated appeals for external oversight. Even where praise exists for individual clinicians, the recurring themes point to systemic gaps that can jeopardize a resident’s basic needs. This is not a place to test tolerance for lapses in care on a long-term basis.
On the upside, concrete care pockets can support meaningful progress. One account highlights daily physical therapy contributing to regained ability to walk after a serious injury, underscoring rehab potential when therapy teams stay engaged. A few CNAs and nurses stand out for genuine attentiveness, and a named nurse, Monica Rani, is repeatedly praised for going beyond routine duties to fulfill patient needs. Hospice-appropriate care in at least one case also demonstrates capacity for compassionate support when circumstances require it.
Yet the cons carry substantial weight that must be balanced against any rehab benefits. Understaffing translates into delayed responses, missed hygiene tasks, and insufficient monitoring. Complaints span unsafe bed setups to dehydration and inconsistent attention during shifts, with some reviews alleging a culture that tolerates neglect. Management receive blame for not prioritizing timely maintenance or adequate staffing, which compounds risk for residents who depend on continuous supervision and reliable routines.
When rehab effectiveness is the strongest pro, it can offset some concerns for a highly involved family, provided that a dedicated care partner remains close to the resident and the facility can guarantee consistent PT access. However, the negative patterns, staff fatigue, uneven care quality, cleanliness issues, and safety lapses, make the overall value proposition fragile for most long-term residents. The experiences are highly polarized: excellent therapy and caring moments can coexist with troubling daily-care gaps, producing expectations that are hard to harmonize.
For families weighing options, disciplined due diligence is essential. Schedule a face-to-face tour, observe a shift, and request candid conversations with rehabilitation staff, nursing leadership, and the administrator. Probe staffing ratios, turnover, and how care orders, especially nutrition and hydration, are followed. Review recent state inspections and any corrective actions, and verify that bed safety features are in place. If assurances on staffing, cleanliness, and consistent daily care cannot be solid, seek alternatives with steadier staffing and higher care standards to avoid unnecessary risk to a loved one.
48 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
San Francisco International (1 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States