7655 Prince Street, Citrus Heights, CA 95610
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Helping Hands Costs & Pricing
Helping Hands presents a competitive pricing structure for its accommodations when compared to Sacramento County and the broader California market. For private rooms, Helping Hands offers rates at $2,500 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,686 and the statewide figure of $3,939. This trend continues with one-bedroom units priced at $3,000, which is again more affordable than the county's average of $3,758 and the state's benchmark of $4,340. These cost-effective options not only make Helping Hands an attractive choice for individuals seeking quality housing but also reflect a commitment to providing accessible living solutions within an increasingly challenging housing landscape.
| Floor plans | Helping Hands | Sacramento County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $2,500 | $3,686 | $3,939 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,000 | $3,758 | $4,340 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Helping Hands
Pros
They provide outstanding care and go the extra mile to help.
They are the most caring staff the reviewer met.
They spent all day setting up the room, showing dedication.
They understand dementia and hospice and are resourceful.
The food is great and there is lots of love.
The staff is friendly and accommodating.
The grandmother liked the food and could order whatever she wanted.
They are great at helping with showers and dressing, and the rooms are clean.
Amy Wall took great care of the reviewer and their mom.
The place is perfect and meets all of the mother’s needs.
The reviewer would recommend Helping Hands Residential Care to friends and family.
Cons
Scheduling and case management are forgetful, leading to delays when no-shows or missed calls occur.
There have been numerous instances of insufficient caregiver coverage, leaving clients in distress.
A supervisor promised to cover shifts but never shows up, which is unprofessional.
The failure of supervisors to follow through raises concerns about whether they truly uphold the company’s values and put clients first.
An unprofessional office staff member can damage the company’s integrity, and the company needs to be more appreciative of caregivers who pull double shifts.
The lack of a night-time buzzer to call for help is a real safety drawback.
The experience has been described as the worst ever and the company is not recommended for any caregivers or nursing staff.
Communication issues due to accents sometimes hinder understanding, though efforts were made to work through them.
Review
Helping Hands Residential Care in Citrus Heights is best suited for families who value intimate, caregiver-led attention over formal amenities. This small-scale setting feels like a home, where staff personally set up rooms, greet residents by name, and lean into dementia- and hospice-informed care. It is especially well-suited for residents who want genuine warmth, predictable daily routines, and the flexibility to customize meals and personal preferences. If the priority is a hands-on, compassionate caregiver team that treats each resident like family, Helping Hands delivers.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families needing highly reliable, fail-safe scheduling and continuous, supervisor-level oversight. A recurring theme in the reviews is coverage gaps and last-minute scrambling when shifts don’t fill, and a supervisor who commits to coverage but does not deliver. Language barriers can also pose challenges for some residents, and a nighttime call system appears absent in practice, raising safety concerns for night needs. For residents who crave wide-ranging activities, outdoor outings, or more freedom of movement, the setting’s constraints may feel limiting.
On the positive side, the strongest pro is outstanding, hands-on care: caregivers who go the extra mile, a staff culture described as loving and responsive, and a proven ability to handle dementia and hospice needs with resourcefulness. Food is praised, and the personal touch, room setup, room cleanliness, and a home-like atmosphere, adds meaning to daily living. These strengths matter for families whose priority is a nurturing environment and specialized dementia/hospice support, particularly when medical complexity exists.
However, these advantages do not fully compensate for core reliability gaps. Scheduling forgetfulness and coverage gaps can leave residents understaffed at critical times, creating distress and safety risks. A supervisor who promises coverage but fails to show erodes trust and raises questions about operational values and accountability. While the culture is warm, a resident may endure episodes without adequate coverage during shifts, which undermines continuity of care and can be distressing for both residents and families. Language barriers, while manageable, may complicate communication for some residents, and a lack of a nighttime buzzer undermines safety for nocturnal needs.
To make a well-informed decision, prospective families should press for specifics: daily caregiver-to-resident ratios, the exact process for filling shifts, and a transparent on-call plan for emergencies. Request a tour that focuses on how staff interact with residents who have memory loss, and ask to meet the supervisor who oversees care coordination to gauge reliability and accountability. Inquire about activities, outdoor access, and whether residents can walk or leave the community for short periods. Confirm if room customization is truly as flexible as promised and whether staff can accommodate individual routines around meals and personal preferences. Finally, seek references from current families about consistency of staffing and responsiveness to concerns.
Overall impressions show a 3.8 rating, with two five-star and two four-star reviews balanced by one critical experience. The favorable accounts highlight exceptional warmth, highly capable dementia/hospice care, and a resident-centric atmosphere, including tasty meals and a room that feels cared for. The critical review centers on staffing unreliability, with missed shifts and a supervisor who did not follow through, describing a pattern more than an isolated incident. That tension between extraordinary caregiver energy and inconsistent scheduling is the dominant theme a family must weigh. The small-home environment can be a double-edged sword: it nurtures close relationships but can also amplify the impact of staffing gaps.
Bottom line: Helping Hands is a strong fit for families prioritizing compassionate, dementia-aware care in a homelike setting, where staff take ownership of daily life, meals, and room arrangements. It may be less suitable for those who require rock-solid staffing reliability, more robust activity options, or unrestricted mobility and safety features like immediate night-time assistance. Prospective clients should conduct a rigorous on-site evaluation, verify staffing stability, and request clear policies on coverage and supervision. With the right resident and family expectations, Helping Hands can deliver meaningful quality of life, just with eyes open to the realities of scheduling and oversight.










An In-Depth Look at Reminiscence Therapy in Dementia Care
Dementia-Related Hallucinations: Causes, Experiences, and Practical Approaches
Illuminating Insights About Alzheimer's Disease: Ten Crucial Realities