Fairwheather Assisted Senior Care

Pros

• It is described as the best place a senior can live, with the lowest rent and cleanest apartments.
• The reviewer notes that the apartment they have is very nice.
• The community offers amenities such as a heated pool, hot tub, shuffleboard, pool table, and a large TV.
• Maintenance is described as timely in addressing issues.
• Rochelle in the office is described as the best - knowledgeable and super friendly.
• Erica, the manager, is described as very friendly and helpful.

Cons

• The building is poorly maintained and neglected.
• Housekeeping is horrible; the property is never clean.
• Parking is a nightmare with disputed spaces and cars blocked.
• The pool area is poorly cleaned, and the spa has green algae.
• Elevators have been out for a week in a four-story senior building.
• Office staff are unresponsive and maintenance requests are not timely addressed.
• The property has roaches in some units, dirty carpets, and a strong odor of urine and feces.
• Trash chutes stink and the grounds are littered with trash and boxes; hallways are unsightly on certain floors.
• The first floor entrance appears designed for optics rather than resident quality.
• Management is perceived as not caring about the property or the elder tenants.
• Rent increases are possible under the low-income housing tax credit status, with little cap.

Review

Over the years, Canyon Country Senior Apartments has been a mixed bag for residents and visitors alike. One frequent observer who visited a family member living there for several days painted a scene of steady decline: a complex once thought to be a simple, affordable home for seniors now showing the wear of long-term neglect. The commenter compared the property's condition unfavorably to other well-known housing projects, suggesting that the current state of Canyon Country - rundown carpeting that carries the odors of pets, roaches in some units, a grounds area littered with trash, and hallways that feel more like a neglected building than a welcoming residence - is a far cry from what one might expect in a senior community. The outer appearance, particularly the first-floor entrance, was described as the most impressionable and, in this view, primarily designed for optics rather than genuine upkeep or livability.

The interior realities mirror the exterior concerns. The reviewer described floors that are perpetually cluttered with trash and boxes in certain hallways and trash chutes that emit an unpleasant stench. The carpets throughout the building were said to be dirty, contributing to a pervasive sense of uncleanliness, while specific units reportedly harbor roaches. Add to that the sense that the grounds are not consistently maintained, and it becomes clear why this observer attributes a large portion of the facility's problems to the quality (or lack) of property management rather than to residents alone. In short, the physical environment - sooften the first and most tangible impression of any senior living community - felt neglected on multiple fronts.

A central theme across many accounts is the management and parking situation. A strong, almost emotional charge comes from the phrase "Poor Property Management," accompanied by a frustration with parking that some residents experience as a daily obstacle. The morning before departure, the visitor found their car blocked by a tenant, leaving them stranded in the cold until the neighbor in unit 322 moved his vehicle. The space in question, number 95, had reportedly been assigned to that tenant for more than five years according to claims, with the broader concern being a lack of clear, enforced parking management. The observer suggested that the property's operator - Greystar Management - might consider buying out units to upgrade the property and create an environment that attracts tenants with higher income, all while reclaiming a sense of pride in the community. This contentious issue of who should live there and how parking is allocated underscores a broader sense that the complex is not being managed to support safety, access, or convenience for all residents.

Critics also zeroed in on the management company's execution in everyday operations. The reviewers who labeled the property as "the worst management company" pointed to a cascade of failures: housekeeping that is "horrible" and rarely up to standard, persistent parking nightmares, amenities that have been stripped or underserviced, and a pool area that is not properly cleaned - complete with a spa that harbors green algae. The property, in their view, was neglected and poorly maintained, with office staff described as transient or unhelpful. The sentiment that the management team does not seem to care about the property or its elder tenants runs through these assessments, creating a picture of a facility where procedures, maintenance, and tenant relations are out of alignment with residents' needs.

Yet the story of Canyon Country isn't uniformly bleak. There are voices that speak to a different reality: moments of satisfaction and genuine appreciation for certain staff and a few conveniences. Some residents insist it can be "the best place a senior can live," citing low rents and relatively clean apartments as advantages within the affordable housing framework. A few residents praised elevators on some floors, heated pools, hot tubs, and social or activity rooms that offer recreation and social opportunities. In particular, individual staff members received high marks: one resident singled out Rochelle in the office and Erica, the manager, praising their friendliness, knowledge, and helpfulness. There are also anecdotes about rents for a one-bedroom around a thousand dollars, plus utilities, and about living on a fourth floor with accessible amenities and responsive maintenance when issues arise.

The application process and its financial dynamics also emerge as a point of contention in some accounts. One prospective resident described a grueling, drawn-out application experience that stretched over more than a year, with repeated requests for income documentation, tax returns, and banking information. Even after supplying all the requested materials and explaining that the applicant was no longer employed in another state, the process continued to feel opaque and frustrating. The experience led to a firm decision not to pursue the unit, with a clear message that the process could turn away otherwise qualified applicants who simply needed a straightforward path to tenancy. Complicating matters for current residents, there are concerns about rent increases tied to the low-income housing tax credit program, which some fear can be exercised with substantial frequency, potentially eroding affordability over time.

Community life, too, can feel uneven. One reviewer described children running in the halls and the pressure of parking stickers and towing policies that add a sense of enforcement rather than community cohesion. The sense that management does not always answer calls or respond to maintenance requests in a timely or reliable fashion was echoed by several accounts, though not universally. Some residents reported a clear distinction between emergency maintenance responsiveness and routine maintenance requests, with the latter often going unanswered unless the matter was urgent. This inconsistency in responsiveness adds another layer to the overall uncertainty residents feel about the reliability and quality of living at Canyon Country.

Taken together, the mosaic of reviews reveals a property with deeply divided experiences: moments of comfort, convenience, and competent staff in some cases, juxtaposed with persistent concerns about cleanliness, safety, and overall management efficacy in others. The most authoritative threads point to aging infrastructure and the heavy burden of coordinating a complex community for residents who deserve stability, respect, and dependable upkeep. For some, improvements are visible and appreciated; for others, issues persist and the sense of pride in their living environment remains elusive. The result is a portrait of Canyon Country Senior Apartments as a place capable of offering meaningful shelter and community, but one that still struggles with core operational challenges that can have real consequences for its neighbors, visitors, and long-time residents alike.

Located in the heart of Canyon County, California, this area offers convenient access to various amenities essential for senior living. With multiple pharmacies such as CVS and Walgreens within close proximity, residents have easy access to their medication needs. Additionally, there are reputable physicians and medical facilities nearby, including The Allergy and Asthma Institute of The Valley and Valencia Center for Women's Health. Various dining options such as Everest Burgers and La Cocina Bar & Grill provide a variety of choices for meals. For recreation, parks like Oak Spring Park and Valencia Glen Park offer opportunities for outdoor activities. Furthermore, places of worship like Real Life Church and Higher Vision Church cater to spiritual needs. Overall, this area combines convenience, healthcare access, dining options, recreational facilities, and spiritual support making it a desirable location for senior living in Canyon County.

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.7 miles)
• Walgreens (0.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.4 miles)
• Walgreens (3.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.2 miles)
• Walgreens (4.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.6 miles)

Physicians

• The Allergy and Asthma Institute of The Valley (0.7 miles)
• Facey Medical Group (1.7 miles)
• Prima Pediatrics (1.8 miles)
• Triangle Medical Group (2.4 miles)
• Santa Clarita Vision Center (3.6 miles)
• Dr Cameron Grade, DC (3.9 miles)
• Valencia Center for Women's Health (4.5 miles)

Restaurants

• Everest Burgers (0.9 miles)
• McDonald's (1.5 miles)
• Jack In The Box (1.7 miles)
• Rattler's Bar B Que (1.7 miles)
• Ay Caramba (1.7 miles)
• La Cocina Bar & Grill (2.1 miles)
• Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (2.2 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (1.4 miles)
• Starbucks (1.7 miles)
• Panera Bread (2.3 miles)
• Honu Coffee (4.5 miles)
• Lazy Dog Cafe (4.8 miles)
• Starbucks (4.9 miles)
• Corner Bakery Cafe (4.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Wespark Non-Profit Cancer Support Center (2.2 miles)
• Henry Mayo Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (4.9 miles)
• Nutricia North America (5.7 miles)
• Olive View Ucla Medical Center (6.9 miles)
• Tebi, Sina Dr - Providence Holy Cross Medical Center Diabetes Education (10 miles)
• Rinaldi Convalescent Hospital (10.1 miles)

Parks

• Oak Spring Park (3.4 miles)
• Valencia Glen Park (4.7 miles)
• O'Melveny Park (8.5 miles)
• Castaic Lake Recreation Area (9.8 miles)
• Holleigh Bernson Memorial Park (10.7 miles)

Places of Worship

• Real Life Church (4.5 miles)
• Higher Vision Church (7.5 miles)