Foundation for Senior Living

Pros

• Reviewers describe Allthrive365/FSL as their favorite place to help and volunteer.
• Tamara (Tami) Bohannon is praised as awesome to work with.
• Cherise is warmly regarded and frequently seen with appreciation.
• The organization is described as doing a lot for people in need.
• It is viewed as a great place for people 62 and older, offering information and help.
• The staff are described as very nice and taking care of people right away.
• They are said to do great work in the community.
• They have a wonderful dietitian, Dana Thomson, who is awesome and attentive to patients' needs.
• The organization is described as the best home care/home health out there.

Cons

• The reviewer claims that after exercising free speech, they received a threatening letter from the organization's attorney demanding a retraction, which they describe as intimidation rather than addressing concerns.
• They allege that AllThrive365/FSL chooses legal threats to silence criticism instead of addressing substantive issues.
• The reviewer argues that taxpayer funds are being used to retaliate against critics rather than to serve the community.
• They contend that vulnerable families wait months for essential assistance and are harassed or retaliated against for asking questions about how funds are used.
• They accuse Tamara Bohannon and other leaders of harming vulnerable families and abusing government programs.
• They allege retaliation against those who report abuse, including denial of services and coercive legal action.
• They state that mold-contaminated housing was allowed for months despite knowledge of health hazards by FSL/AllThrive365 and the Arizona Department of Housing.
• They claim ADOH leadership ignored retaliation and abuse, enabling ongoing exploitation of public housing programs.
• They describe home upgrades as mishandled, resulting in structural damage and holes cut in ceilings, walls, and doors with minimal or no cosmetic fixes.
• They criticize upper administration for working from home and not engaging with group homes, implying a lack of on-the-ground oversight.
• They recount an incident where a foundation driver nearly ran them off the road, suggesting unsafe driving practices.

Review

A broad thread runs through a range of voices describing Allthrive365, the organization formerly known as Foundation for Senior Living (FSL). The accounts come from clients, families, volunteers, and critics, and they paint a picture of an agency that is celebrated for some services while simultaneously scrutinized for serious failures. On one hand, there are stories of helpful staff, useful programs, and moments when individuals felt supported during difficult times. On the other hand, there are persistent and troubling claims about mishandled funds, unsafe housing conditions, retaliation against those who raise concerns, and delays that leave people waiting for essential assistance for months at a time. The juxtaposition of praise and alarm underscores a complicated relationship many community members have with the organization and its leadership.

A centerpiece of the concern is the reported clash between exercising civil rights and the organization's responses. One reviewer describes exercising their First Amendment right to question how the organization operates and how taxpayer funds are used, only to receive a threatening letter from the organization's attorney demanding a retraction. Rather than engaging on the merits of the concerns raised, the feedback portrays the response as intimidation through legal pressure. This is presented as a troubling signal to anyone who depends on public services funded through government dollars, raising questions about accountability, transparency, and the protection of residents and families who bravely speak up about problems.

Several reviews focus on leadership and how it has affected service delivery. The account centers on Tamara (Tami) Bohannon, described as the organization's leader, who is accused of steering the agency away from its mission and toward practices that harm vulnerable families and misuse government programs. The writer alleges repeated denials of qualification for needed assistance despite meeting criteria, followed by retaliation such as hiring counsel to coerce compliance. The Healthy Homes Program is singled out as a particular exposure point, where mold and other health and safety hazards persisted even when the Arizona Department of Housing (ADOH) was aware of problems. In this framing, senior ADOH figures like Kathie Blodgett and Joan Serviss are criticized for inaction, with the suggestion that they tolerated or failed to intervene in retaliatory or abusive practices.

A recurring claim in the narratives is that there is systemic abuse of government programs in Arizona, with the implication that FSL/Allthrive365 operates with some degree of protection or impunity within the apparatus of state oversight. The reviewers argue that families are left in unsafe or unsanitary housing, that needed services are withheld, and that intimidation or retaliation accompanies attempts to report problems. The call from these voices is for removal of certain leaders and for genuine oversight and reform so that public resources serve the community rather than become tools for silencing criticism or shielding mismanagement. Taken together, these accounts present a case for deep scrutiny of how decisions are made, how funds are allocated, and how residents' safety and rights are protected when problems arise.

Beyond the leadership and oversight questions, there are vivid, individual stories about day-to-day operations. One critic writes, "I would never put my mother in your facility," recounting a driver who allegedly nearly caused a car accident, and describing group homes where basic needs were unmet: little or no food, dirty conditions, and a lack of showers or cleaning supplies. The reviewer recounts seeing staff monitored via cameras and notes that some residents had toenails so long they hindered their mobility. The narrative tells of licensing visits that prompted temporary improvements, followed by a relapse into neglect. These anecdotes emphasize not only safety concerns but also a sense of ongoing abuse or mismanagement, with the implication that licensing and external checks sometimes bring only momentary fixes rather than lasting change.

Yet the collection of experiences is not uniformly negative. Other reviewers highlight positive engagements and programs that helped people move forward. Several acknowledge supportive staff members who were kind and responsive, and they recount moments when assistance arrived promptly. Volunteers speak of joy and purpose, delivering Christmas gifts to seniors and expressing a commitment to continue. There are mentions of specific individuals - such as a person named Tatum who was praised for their work, and Cherise, who was appreciated by volunteers - suggesting that some staff and volunteers genuinely connect with the community and make meaningful contributions. Some residents report finding apartments or getting guidance that helped them navigate housing or health-related services, underscoring that effective help did exist within the organization at times.

The tapestry of feedback also includes practical, day-to-day operational notes. Several respondents describe difficulties in reaching staff by phone and delays in returning calls or processing applications. Others recount that the organization provided information about services for seniors, housing vouchers, and other resources, or that they offered access to a dietitian or other health support. There are also cautionary words about contractors connected with the organization - with one reviewer warning about a home improvement contractor whose work resulted in damage and who showed little concern for repairing the consequences. While these comments touch on related services and partnerships, they contribute to a broader sense of inconsistency: some experiences are marked by prompt, compassionate care and useful referrals, while others reveal gaps in communication, reliability, or follow-through.

Taken as a whole, the collection of experiences presents a complex portrait of Allthrive365/FSL. The organization is described by some as a valuable community resource that improves lives, provides health and housing assistance, and mobilizes volunteers to support seniors and families in need. At the same time, a substantial and serious thread of testimony questions whether the same institution, under its leadership, is fulfilling its public obligations, protecting vulnerable people, and using taxpayer dollars appropriately. The call across these observations is for heightened oversight, greater transparency in how funds are used, and stronger safeguards to ensure that services reach those most in need without fear of retaliation for speaking up. In a system designed to serve the community, reviewers insist, accountability and safety must come first, with clear steps to address concerns, remedy harm, and restore trust among residents, families, and volunteers who rely on these programs.

This particular area of Scottsdale, Arizona, offers a convenient and diverse range of amenities suitable for seniors looking to settle down in a vibrant community. With several hospitals and medical centers within close proximity, residents can easily access quality healthcare services. Additionally, there are numerous pharmacies nearby for medication needs. The neighborhood also boasts a variety of restaurants, cafes, and theaters for entertainment and dining options. Places of worship cater to spiritual needs, while parks provide opportunities for outdoor activities and relaxation. Transportation facilities are easily accessible for those who require travel convenience. Overall, this area provides a balanced blend of essential services and recreational opportunities that may appeal to seniors seeking a comfortable and enriching living environment.

Hospitals

• Greenbaum Surgery Center (0.4 miles)
• Maricopa Medical Center (6.3 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (0.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.1 miles)
• Walgreens (2.2 miles)
• Walgreens (2.2 miles)
• Walgreens (2.5 miles)
• Walgreens (3.5 miles)

Restaurants

• Culinary Dropout (0.5 miles)
• Boondocks Patio & Grill (0.5 miles)
• Shake Shack (0.6 miles)
• Francine (0.7 miles)
• Toca Madera Scottsdale (0.7 miles)
• McDonald's (1 miles)
• Defalco's Italian Grocery (1.4 miles)

Physicians

• One Medical (0.5 miles)
• Scottsdale Cardiovascular Center (0.8 miles)
• Azam Medical Clinic (2.1 miles)
• Null (3.5 miles)
• Valley Sleep Center - Scottsdale Center (6 miles)
• Momdoc-Women for Women (6.2 miles)
• Advanced Fertility Care (6.3 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (1.2 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (1.8 miles)
• Bikini Beans Espresso (3.5 miles)
• Starbucks (4.2 miles)
• Provision Coffee Bar (5 miles)
• Starbucks (5.1 miles)
• Cartel Coffee Lab (5.2 miles)

Theaters

• Harkins Tempe Marketplace 16 (4.5 miles)

Places of Worship

• Salt River Assembly of God (4.5 miles)
• Christ Church of the Ascension (4.6 miles)
• Islamic Community Center of Tempe (4.9 miles)

Parks

• Tempe Beach Park (4.6 miles)
• Blue Sky Airport Parking (6 miles)

Transportation

• METRO University Dr /Rural (5.1 miles)
• The Centurion Lounge (5.6 miles)
• Terminal 4, Concourse B (5.7 miles)
• Concourse C (5.7 miles)
• Terminal 4 (5.8 miles)
• Admirals Club (5.8 miles)
• Admirals Club (5.9 miles)