1703 60th Street, Kenosha, WI 53140
To contact a resident: (262) 658-4125
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Kenosha Estates Living & Care Center Costs & Pricing
Kenosha Estates Living & Care Center offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to the broader costs within Kenosha County and the state of Wisconsin. For a semi-private room, the monthly cost is set at $6,392, which exceeds both the county average of $5,073 and the state average of $3,977. Meanwhile, private rooms are priced at $7,036, again higher than the county's average of $4,804 and the state's average of $4,339. While these rates may appear elevated in comparison to local and statewide alternatives, they reflect the quality of care and amenities provided by Kenosha Estates Living & Care Center, making it an important consideration for individuals seeking exceptional senior living options.
| Floor plans | Kenosha Estates Living & Care Center | Kenosha County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $6,392 | $5,073 | $3,977 |
| Private | $7,036 | $4,804 | $4,339 |
Overall Review of Kenosha Estates Living & Care Center
Pros
The staff are very friendly.- Don and Adon are great.
- The therapy ladies are great.
- The people there were very nice.
- The reviewer would recommend the facility in a heartbeat.
- Christine provided exemplary service and assistance.
Cons
The facility should be condemned.- The tile is coming up on the floor.
- The beds are outdated, dating to around 1970.
- The meals are prepared by staff and are typically sandwiches.
- A resident was seen distributing juice from a bottle he had been drinking from.
- Overall, the place is described as hideous.
- The rehab center prioritizes cost over residents.
- The food is terrible, even with a new chef.
- It is the worst nursing home ever.
- Calls go unanswered, and the state should investigate.
Review
Kenosha Estates Living & Care Center in Kenosha, Wisconsin is best suited for families with extremely limited options who prioritize cost over dependable quality of care. The overall impression from the reviews is stark: maintenance and safety concerns, inconsistent hygiene, and mixed-to-poor staffing results create a high-risk environment for seniors who depend on reliable nursing oversight and respectful, timely support. This is not a facility that can be counted on to deliver steady, high-quality care without vigilant, ongoing family involvement and outside oversight.
Those evaluating places for a loved one should explicitly consider alternatives if the priority is consistent medical monitoring, clean living spaces, and staff who respond promptly to needs. For anyone whose loved one requires regular hygiene assistance, predictable meals, or dignified, attentive treatment, other options are strongly advised. The gap between the best intentions and daily reality here is large enough that families should not assume improvement without verifiable, sustained evidence.
There are a few throughlines of potential strength, but they are largely eclipsed by the downsides. A handful of staff receive praise for responsiveness, and therapy teams are frequently described as excellent. Some aides perform competently, and there are occasional mentions of extra effort from a few employees. A new chef has been noted, suggesting attempts to improve meals, yet overall food quality remains a frequent complaint. Even with these narrow positives, they fail to compensate for the more consequential problems that pervade daily operations.
The core concerns are hard to overlook. The facility shows signs of aging and deferred maintenance, with reports of chipped walls, crumbling ceilings, and outdated furnishings. Hygiene issues appear persistent, including accounts of unpleasant odors, soiled linens, and instances where basic cleanliness did not meet expectations. Staff communication and responsiveness are problem areas, with criticisms that call lights go unanswered for long periods and that some personnel can be rude. Most troubling are documented safety lapses and medical errors, including reports of catheter reuse, infections, and multiple hospital visits, as well as allegations of medication errors that resulted in serious harm. These patterns create a fragile risk environment where the worst-case scenarios are depressingly plausible.
To decide wisely, families should insist on full transparency before admission. Seek out the latest state inspection results and any corrective-action plans, request to meet the administrator and the director of nursing, and arrange unannounced tours to observe daily routines. Question staffing levels, turnover, and how often aides and nurses are on the floor with residents. Sample meals, inspect rooms for cleanliness and safety, and speak directly with several residents and family members about their experiences. Require a concrete, written plan for addressing hygiene, medication safety, and call-light responsiveness, along with clear timelines for promised improvements. Only concrete, verifiable progress in these areas should move consideration away from caution toward cautious endorsement.
In sum, Kenosha Estates presents significant, well-documented risks that generally outweigh its limited positives. For most families, alternatives with stronger safety records, better hygiene standards, and more consistently compassionate staffing are the prudent path. If remaining on the table, the decision should hinge on an aggressive oversight plan, rigorous monitoring, and a clear, time-bound commitment to meaningful improvements that address core care quality rather than cosmetic fixes.
Skilled Nursing Facility
Activities on-site
Beautician on-site
Devotional services on-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Private
Incontinence care
Meals provided
8 Essential Assistive Devices for Older Adults
Navigating the Financial Road to Nursing Home Care: In-Depth Guidance and Resources
Supportive Employee Benefits That Help Caregivers Attain Better Work-Life Harmony