Collinwood Nursing & Rehab in Plano, TX

Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby

• from +$288 / mo

  The Tradition - Prestonwood

  4.9 from 17 reviews

  $3,795 to $5,995 / month

  8.0 miles away
• from +$593 / mo

  The Monarch at Richardson

  4.8 from 92 reviews

  $4,100 to $6,995 / month

  4.4 miles away
• from -$412 / mo

  Atria Carrollton

  4.7 from 171 reviews

  $3,095 to $6,795 / month

  12.4 miles away
• from -$512 / mo

  Parsons House Preston Hollow

  4.7 from 69 reviews

  $2,995 to $4,295 / month

  14.1 miles away
• from -$157 / mo

  Bethesda Gardens Frisco

  4.6 from 135 reviews

  $3,350 to $4,950 / month

  14.6 miles away

Pros

• The staff are friendly and helpful when they are around.
• The staff were very friendly.
• The facility staff were extremely friendly during the tour.
• The food is decent.
• The rooms are not too bad.

Cons

• The facility is changing for the worst and deteriorating.
• Staff members in key positions are often rude.
• When calling, residents are passed around to several staff without getting questions answered or a resolution.
• The administrator and social worker do not respond to calls and merely relay what staff tell them.
• Decisions are often made without the consent of the family or the responsible party.
• There is a revolving door of new staff members.
• Physician orders from outside the facility are often not followed as specified by the doctor.
• The facility claims to be memory care but provides little daily care for residents with advanced memory needs.
• The building is run-down and smells.

Review

Collinwood Nursing & Rehab in Plano is best suited for families that must stretch a budget and are willing to take on active oversight to compensate for variable care coordination. The reviews consistently point to systemic gaps in responsiveness and in following physician orders, which means reliable, hands-on family involvement becomes a prerequisite rather than a bonus. This is a facility where cost savings may come with trade-offs in consistency, communication, and formal care planning. Alternatives should be considered for residents whose needs include dependable medical coordination, stable administrator accessibility, or robust memory-care programming; this community often falls short on those fronts.

On the surface, there are a few practical positives that families may notice. Several reviewers report friendly frontline staff when present, and the food is described as decent with rooms that are passable for an older building. Tours also highlighted approachable staff, suggesting a welcoming demeanor at times. However, these strengths are unevenly distributed and do not compensate for the larger, recurring failures that color the overall experience. The presence of moments of courtesy and reasonable amenities cannot erase the deeper disconnect between what is promised and what is reliably delivered day-to-day.

The most pervasive drawbacks stem from poor communication and inconsistent leadership. Reviews repeatedly describe rude behavior among key staff, with callers bounced among multiple people and questions left unresolved. Administrators and social workers are cited as unresponsive, and decisions are often framed as final without family consent. More troubling are accounts of staff providing conflicting information, especially around doctor visits and external physician orders, and a persistent sense that promises about care or services are not fulfilled. This pattern erodes trust and makes lawful coordination of medical care difficult for families.

Even when positives appear, they fail to offset the central problems. The revolving-door staffing and the lack of timely, accurate information undermine safety and daily functioning. Billing concerns, repeated charges for the same services, compound the frustration and raise questions about transparency. For memory-care needs, the facility claims to offer specialized programming, yet multiple reviews suggest meaningful daily attention to cognitive care is lacking. In short, the gaps in follow-through, documentation, and resident supervision far exceed any minor comfort provided by a pleasant conversation or a decent meal.

For families evaluating options, a disciplined, proactive strategy is essential. Demand direct contact with a facility administrator and set up a formal, written care plan with explicit physician-order follow-through. Request weekly updates on care decisions and hold the staff to a clear timeline for addressing call lights and personal-care needs. Review all billing statements line-by-line, and verify which services are billed versus those actually delivered. If memory care is a priority, insist on demonstrable daily programming and measurable outcomes. Without strenuous oversight, the risks exposed by inconsistent care and communication will persist.

Ultimately, this community is not a strong fit for residents requiring reliable medical coordination and consistently responsive caregiving. It may serve budget-conscious families who can commit to vigilant oversight, frequent visits, and meticulous monitoring of care plans and billing. Otherwise, strongly consider alternatives with steadier staffing, clearer administrator access, and proven adherence to physician orders and memory-care programming. The prudent path is to prioritize facilities where consistency, transparency, and proactive resident-centered care are clearly demonstrated, even if it means paying a bit more.